Sevoflurane or propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthetic regimens represent modern techniques for neurosurgical anaesthesia. Nevertheless, there are potential differences related to their activity on the cerebrovascular system. The magnitude of such difference is not completely known. In total 40 patients, treated for spinal or maxillo-facial disorders, were randomly allocated to either i.v. propofol-remifentanil or inhalational sevoflurane anaesthesia. Transcranial Doppler was used to assess changes in cerebral blood flow velocity, carbon dioxide reactivity, cerebral autoregulation and the bispectral index to assess the depth of anaesthesia. Time-averaged mean flow velocity (MFV) was significantly reduced after induction of anaesthesia in both sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil groups (P<0.001). At deeper levels of anaesthesia, MFV increased in the sevoflurane group, suggesting an uncoupling flow/metabolism, whereas it was further reduced in the propofol-remifentanil group (P<0.001). Indices of cerebral autoregulation were reduced in patients with high-dose sevoflurane whereas autoregulation was preserved in patients anaesthetized with propofol-remifentanil (P<0.001). Higher CO(2) concentrations impaired cerebral autoregulation in the sevoflurane group but not in patients anaesthetized with propofol-remifentanil. Propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia induced a dose-dependent low-flow state with preserved cerebral autoregulation, whereas sevoflurane at high doses provided a certain degree of luxury perfusion.

Spinal tumor (ST) surgery carries the risk of new neurological deficits in the postoperative period. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and mapping (IONM) represents an effective method of identifying and monitoring in real time the functional integrity of both the spinal cord (SC) and the nerve roots (NRs). Despite consensus favoring the use of IONM in ST surgery, in this era of evidence-based medicine, there is still a need to demonstrate the effective role of IONM in ST surgery in achieving an oncological cure, optimizing patient safety, and considering medicolegal aspects. Thus, neurosurgeons are asked to establish which techniques are considered indispensable. In the present study, the authors focused on the rationale for and the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) of IONM in ST surgery in light of more recent evidence in the literature, with specific emphasis on the role of IONM in reducing the incidence of postoperative neurological deficits. This review confirms the role of IONM as a useful tool in the workup for ST surgery. Individual monitoring and mapping techniques are clearly not sufficient to account for the complex function of the SC and NRs. Conversely, multimodal IONM is highly sensitive and specific for anticipating neurological injury during ST surgery and represents an important tool for preserving neuronal structures and achieving an optimal postoperative functional outcome.