Taehee Choi

Dr. Taehee Choi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 May 2011 in Journal of Business Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCTaehee Choi
Taehee Choi
JPJinhan Pae
Jinhan Pae

24 July 2007 in Journal of Business Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCTaehee Choi
Taehee Choi
JJJinchul Jung
Jinchul Jung

24 November 2010 in Journal of Business Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJinhan Pae
Jinhan Pae
TCTaehee Choi
Taehee Choi

24 May 2012 in Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TCTaehee Choi
Taehee Choi
ELEunchul Lee
Eunchul Lee
JPJinhan Pae
Jinhan Pae
This study examines the cost of equity capital (COC) and the factors that influence the COC of listed Korean companies, and compares the COC of Korean companies with that of companies from 31 selected countries. The major research question is whether companies that are listed in an emerging market have a disadvantage as they are underpriced through a higher COC (as compared with companies that are traded in developed markets). Consistent with the “Korea Discount,” we find that the COC is significantly higher for Korean companies than for companies in other countries after controlling for other relevant factors. However, the “Korea Discount” has significantly eased in recent years.

16 February 2018 in Human Systems Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCTaehee Choi
Taehee Choi
CNChiaki Nakano
Chiaki Nakano
Using questionnaire surveys, this study investigates ethics-related attitudes and practices in Japan and South Korea, pertaining to their business enterprises. To enable assessing ethics-perceptions changes over time, said surveys replicate similar studies, conducted in both countries 10 years prior to the current one. Namely, this article investigates (1) ethical conflicts, (2) unethical practices, (3) managers’ responses to hypothetical situations, (4) ethics standards, and (5) the institutionalization of ethics in Japan and South Korea, pertaining to business enterprises. Overall, our 2014 and 2015 survey results are reasonably similar to those of previous studies. Also observed are, however, an increase in ethics awareness among Japanese and South Korean business respondents, and an overall improvement in ethics standards in both countries. The empirical findings suggest that, through time, ethical perceptions of Japanese and South Korean business respondents seem to be converging, and coinciding with those of previous studies’ business respondents in US. Yet most persistent are some characteristics peculiar to Japan and South Korea, such as, for example situational ethics in Japan, company-interest-first in South Korea, and ethical relativism in both countries.