Marina Milic

Dr. Marina Milic

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2019 in European Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHarpreet Hyare
Harpreet Hyare
LRLouise Rice
Louise Rice
STStefanie Thust
Stefanie Thust
PNParashkev Nachev
Parashkev Nachev
AJAshwani Jha
Ashwani Jha
JRJeremy Rees
Jeremy Rees

1 March 2022 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CAConstantine Alifrangis
Constantine Alifrangis
ASAnand Sharma
Anand Sharma
SCShafi Chowdhury
Shafi Chowdhury
SDSarah Duncan
Sarah Duncan
Marina MilicMarina Milic
Marina Milic
SSShamash Shamash
Shamash Shamash

9 September 2016 in Practical Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Marina MilicMarina Milic
Marina Milic
JRJeremy H Rees
Jeremy H Rees
Radiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment after surgery for high-grade gliomas and is usually well tolerated. Radiation toxicity in the brain is usually classified according to the timing of side effects in relation to treatment, as either acute (during radiotherapy), early delayed (within 12 weeks of radiotherapy) or late delayed (months to years after radiotherapy). We report two cases of young women who developed severe acute demyelination within 4 months of radiotherapy for glioma, one of whom had a previous history of transverse myelitis. Both improved with corticosteroids and remain in tumour remission. These cases emphasise the importance of careful discussion with patients before starting radiotherapy if there is a previous history of central nervous system demyelination or multiple white matter lesions on MRI.

1 March 2016 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Marina MilicMarina Milic
Marina Milic
AFAnna Foster
Anna Foster
KRKarim Rihawi
Karim Rihawi
AAAlan Anthoney
Alan Anthoney
CTChris Twelves
Chris Twelves

13 September 2019 in Anticancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnand Sharma
Anand Sharma
CAConstantine Alifrangis
Constantine Alifrangis
Marina MilicMarina Milic
Marina Milic
Marcia HallMarcia Hall
Marcia Hall
NVNikhil Vasdev
Nikhil Vasdev
JSJonathan Shamash
Jonathan Shamash
Background/Aim: The occurrence of somatic transformation in germ cell tumour (GCT) is rare, with increased incidence in teratomatous tumours. The aim of this study was to understand the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic GCT with somatic transformation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in two tertiary cancer centres in London. Between 1998 and 2016, 30 cases of somatic transformation in GCT treated at the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and St. Bartholomew's Hospital were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 34 years (range=18-56 years). The histological diagnosis at transformation was rhabdomyosarcoma, sarcomatoid yolk sac, sarcoma (non-specified), clear cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and primitive neuro ectodermal tumour (PNET). Results: The 5-year survival rate of all patients was 47%, and that of patients with testicular primary (n=26 patients) was 37%. Conclusion: Somatic transformation component in testicular GCTs is generally considered to be an adverse prognostic factor, however, a reasonable 5-year overall survival rate (87.5%) was observed in patients who present with this at first diagnosis.

26 December 2018 in In Vivo
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Marina MilicMarina Milic
Marina Milic
Marcia HallMarcia Hall
Marcia Hall
AHAnnette Hawkins
Annette Hawkins
AGAndrew Gogbashian
Andrew Gogbashian
GRGordon Rustin
Gordon Rustin
ASAnand Sharma
Anand Sharma
Background: Single-agent carboplatin at area under the curve 10 (AUC10) is an effective treatment for metastatic seminoma. As far as we are aware of, there have been no studies reporting its effects on short-term quality of life. The objective was to study the efficacy, safety and tolerability, using health-related quality of life, of carboplatin AUC10 chemotherapy in patients with metastatic seminoma. Patients and Methods: Forty-four patients with metastatic seminoma treated at Mount Vernon Cancer Centre with carboplatin AUC10 were included in this study. Response to treatment was determined by radiological imaging (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v 1.1) and serum tumour markers. Toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Quality of life treatment-related toxicities were assessed during treatment at pre-chemotherapy assessments. After treatment, toxicity was assessed using a defined telephone questionnaire consisting of four questions relating to hair loss, hearing impairment, days absent from work, and neuropathy. Results: At a median follow-up of 27.5 (range=4-84) months, no patient had experienced relapse. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 15 (35%) patients, nine (21%) required prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, 13 (30%) patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Commonest non-haematological toxicities were fatigue in 28 (65%) and nausea 14 (33%) patients. They were grade 1 in 82% and 92% of cases, respectively. Six out of 44 (14%) had residual tinnitus. One patient had residual grade 1 peripheral neuropathy. Ten patients continued to work throughout treatment and two patients were retired. Of the remaining patients, 16 (37%), took fewer than 5 days off work. Conclusion: Carboplatin AUC10 is a safe and effective treatment for stage II/III seminoma with better health-related quality of life than experienced with combination cisplatin-based chemotherapy.