Boris Hinz

Dr. Boris Hinz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2002 in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JTJames J. Tomasek
James J. Tomasek
GGGiulio Gabbiani
Giulio Gabbiani
BHBoris Hinz
Boris Hinz
CCChristine Chaponnier
Christine Chaponnier
RBRobert A. Brown
Robert A. Brown

1 June 2007 in The American Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBoris Hinz
Boris Hinz
SPSem H. Phan
Sem H. Phan
VTVictor J. Thannickal
Victor J. Thannickal
AGAndrea Galli
Andrea Galli
MBMarie-Luce Bochaton-Piallat
Marie-Luce Bochaton-Piallat
GGGiulio Gabbiani
Giulio Gabbiani

1 March 2007 in Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBoris Hinz
Boris Hinz
It is generally accepted that fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation represents a key event during wound healing and tissue repair. The high contractile force generated by myofibroblasts is beneficial for physiological tissue remodeling but detrimental for tissue function when it becomes excessive such as in hypertrophic scars, in virtually all fibrotic diseases and during stroma reaction to tumors. Specific molecular features as well as factors that control myofibroblast differentiation are potential targets to counteract its development, function, and survival. Such targets include α-smooth muscle actin and more recently discovered markers of the myofibroblast cytoskeleton, membrane surface proteins, and the extracellular matrix. Moreover, intervening with myofibroblast stress perception and transmission offers novel strategies to reduce tissue contracture; stress release leads to the instant loss of contraction and promotes apoptosis.

17 December 2007 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PWPierre-Jean Wipff
Pierre-Jean Wipff
DRDaniel B. Rifkin
Daniel B. Rifkin
JMJean-Jacques Meister
Jean-Jacques Meister
BHBoris Hinz
Boris Hinz
The conjunctive presence of mechanical stress and active transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) is essential to convert fibroblasts into contractile myofibroblasts, which cause tissue contractures in fibrotic diseases. Using cultured myofibroblasts and conditions that permit tension modulation on the extracellular matrix (ECM), we establish that myofibroblast contraction functions as a mechanism to directly activate TGF-β1 from self-generated stores in the ECM. Contraction of myofibroblasts and myofibroblast cytoskeletons prepared with Triton X-100 releases active TGF-β1 from the ECM. This process is inhibited either by antagonizing integrins or reducing ECM compliance and is independent from protease activity. Stretching myofibroblast-derived ECM in the presence of mechanically apposing stress fibers immediately activates latent TGF-β1. In myofibroblast-populated wounds, activation of the downstream targets of TGF-β1 signaling Smad2/3 is higher in stressed compared to relaxed tissues despite similar levels of total TGF-β1 and its receptor. We propose activation of TGF-β1 via integrin-mediated myofibroblast contraction as a potential checkpoint in the progression of fibrosis, restricting autocrine generation of myofibroblasts to a stiffened ECM.

1 September 2001 in Molecular Biology of the Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBoris Hinz
Boris Hinz
GCGiuseppe Celetta
Giuseppe Celetta
JTJames J. Tomasek
James J. Tomasek
GGGiulio Gabbiani
Giulio Gabbiani
CCChristine Chaponnier
Christine Chaponnier
To evaluate whether α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) plays a role in fibroblast contractility, we first compared the contractile activity of rat subcutaneous fibroblasts (SCFs), expressing low levels of α-SMA, with that of lung fibroblasts (LFs), expressing high levels of α-SMA, with the use of silicone substrates of different stiffness degrees. On medium stiffness substrates the percentage of cells producing wrinkles was similar to that of α-SMA–positive cells in each fibroblast population. On high stiffness substrates, wrinkle production was limited to a subpopulation of LFs very positive for α-SMA. In a second approach, we measured the isotonic contraction of SCF- and LF-populated attached collagen lattices. SCFs exhibited 41% diameter reduction compared with 63% by LFs. TGFβ1 increased α-SMA expression and lattice contraction by SCFs to the levels of LFs; TGFβ-antagonizing agents reduced α-SMA expression and lattice contraction by LFs to the level of SCFs. Finally, 3T3 fibroblasts transiently or permanently transfected with α-SMA cDNA exhibited a significantly higher lattice contraction compared with wild-type 3T3 fibroblasts or to fibroblasts transfected with α-cardiac and β- or γ-cytoplasmic actin. This took place in the absence of any change in smooth muscle or nonmuscle myosin heavy-chain expression. Our results indicate that an increased α-SMA expression is sufficient to enhance fibroblast contractile activity.

1 April 2012 in The American Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BHBoris Hinz
Boris Hinz
SPSem H. Phan
Sem H. Phan
VTVictor J. Thannickal
Victor J. Thannickal
MPMarco Prunotto
Marco Prunotto
ADAlexis Desmoulière
Alexis Desmoulière
GGGiulio Gabbiani
Giulio Gabbiani
The discovery of the myofibroblast has opened new perspectives for the comprehension of the biological mechanisms involved in wound healing and fibrotic diseases. In recent years, many advances have been made in understanding important aspects of myofibroblast basic biological characteristics. This review summarizes such advances in several fields, such as the following: i) force production by the myofibroblast and mechanisms of connective tissue remodeling; ii) factors controlling the expression of α-smooth muscle actin, the most used marker of myofibroblastic phenotype and, more important, involved in force generation by the myofibroblast; and iii) factors affecting genesis of the myofibroblast and its differentiation from precursor cells, in particular epigenetic factors, such as DNA methylation, microRNAs, and histone modification. We also review the origin and the specific features of the myofibroblast in diverse fibrotic lesions, such as systemic sclerosis; kidney, liver, and lung fibrosis; and the stromal reaction to certain epithelial tumors. Finally, we summarize the emerging strategies for influencing myofibroblast behavior in vitro and in vivo, with the ultimate goal of an effective therapeutic approach for myofibroblast-dependent diseases.