Rachel McQuade

Dr. Rachel McQuade


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 June 2017 in Current Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRachel McQuade
Rachel McQuade
VSVanesa Stojanovska
Vanesa Stojanovska
JBJoel Bornstein
Joel Bornstein
KNKulmira Nurgali
Kulmira Nurgali
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one the greatest contributors to cancer related mortality. Although 5 year survival rate for patients at the early stage of CRC (stages I and II) is above 60%, more than 50% of patients are diagnosed at or beyond stage III when distant metastasis has already occurred, in which case 5 year survival rate drops to 10%. Chemotherapeutic intervention coupled with surgery is the backbone of metastatic CRC treatment and the only means of enhanced survival. For decades following its discovery, an antimetabolite 5- fluorouracil (5-FU) was the only chemotherapeutic agent available to successfully improve 12 month survival in CRC patients. Treatment of metastatic CRC has been considered palliative for many years; aiming to increase the duration and quality of the patient's remaining life, with little hope of cure, highlighting the need for novel DNA and RNA targeted therapies in the treatment of CRC. Over the last several decades, combinations of several chemotherapeutic agents have been incorporated into routine clinical practice. Combination regimes incorporating irinotecan, a semisynthetic inhibitor of topoisomerase, oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum compound that causes mitotic arrest via the formation of DNA adducts, and capecitabine, a 5-FU prodrug, are now all established options for use as first-line, second-line and sequential treatment of CRC. This review provides a brief overview of the evolution of CRC chemotherapy as well as new and emerging treatment options.

3 November 2016 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRachel McQuade
Rachel McQuade
VSVanesa Stojanovska
Vanesa Stojanovska
Raquel AbaloRaquel Abalo
Raquel Abalo
JBJoel Bornstein
Joel Bornstein
KNKulmira Nurgali
Kulmira Nurgali
Gastrointestinal (GI) side-effects of chemotherapy are a debilitating and often overlooked clinical hurdle in cancer management. Chemotherapy-induced constipation (CIC) and diarrhoea (CID) present a constant challenge in the efficient and tolerable treatment of cancer and are amongst the primary contributors to dose reductions, delays and cessation of treatment. Although prevalence of CIC is hard to estimate, it is believed to affect approximately 16% of cancer patients, whilst incidence of CID has been estimated to be as high as 80%. Despite this, the underlying mechanisms of both CID and CIC remain unclear, but are believed to result from a combination of intersecting mechanisms including inflammation, secretory dysfunctions, GI dysmotility and alterations in GI innervation. Current treatments for CIC and CID aim to reduce the severity of symptoms rather than combating the pathophysiological mechanisms of dysfunction, and often result in worsening of already chronic GI symptoms or trigger the onset of a plethora of other side-effects including respiratory depression, uneven heartbeat, seizures and neurotoxicity. Emerging treatments including those targeting the enteric nervous system present promising avenues to alleviate CID and CIC. Identification of potential targets for novel therapies to alleviate chemotherapy-induced toxicity is essential to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life amongst cancer sufferers.

7 October 2016 in British Journal of Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRachel McQuade
Rachel McQuade
SCSimona E Carbone
Simona E Carbone
VSVanesa Stojanovska
Vanesa Stojanovska
ARAhmed Ayedur Rahman
Ahmed Ayedur Rahman
RGRachel M Gwynne
Rachel M Gwynne
KNKulmira Nurgali
Kulmira Nurgali
Background and Purpose: Oxaliplatin is a platinum‐based chemotherapeutic drug used as a first‐line therapy for colorectal cancer. However, its use is associated with severe gastrointestinal side‐effects resulting in dose limitations and/or cessation of treatment. In this study, we tested whether oxidative stress, caused by chronic oxaliplatin treatment, induces enteric neuronal damage and colonic dysmotility.Experimental Approach: Oxaliplatin (3 mg·kg−1 per day) was administered in vivo to Balb/c mice intraperitoneally three times a week. The distal colon was collected at day 14 of treatment. Immunohistochemistry was performed in wholemount preparations of submucosal and myenteric ganglia. Neuromuscular transmission was studied by intracellular electrophysiology. Circular muscle tone was studied by force transducers. Colon propulsive activity studied in organ bath experiments and faeces were collected to measure water content.Key Results: Chronic in vivo oxaliplatin treatment resulted in increased formation of reactive oxygen species (O2ˉ), nitration of proteins, mitochondrial membrane depolarisation resulting in the release of cytochrome c, loss of neurons, increased inducible NOS expression and apoptosis in both the submucosal and myenteric plexuses of the colon. Oxaliplatin treatment enhanced NO‐mediated inhibitory junction potentials and altered the response of circular muscles to the NO donor, sodium nitroprusside. It also reduced the frequency of colonic migrating motor complexes and decreased circular muscle tone, effects reversed by the NO synthase inhibitor, Nω‐Nitro‐L‐arginine.Conclusion and Implications: Our study is the first to provide evidence that oxidative stress is a key player in enteric neuropathy and colonic dysmotility leading to symptoms of chronic constipation observed in oxaliplatin‐treated mice.

1 November 2017 in Maturitas
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJonathan Escalante
Jonathan Escalante
RMRachel McQuade
Rachel McQuade
VSVanesa Stojanovska
Vanesa Stojanovska
KNKulmira Nurgali
Kulmira Nurgali

28 June 2016 in Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRachel McQuade
Rachel McQuade
VSV. Stojanovska
V. Stojanovska
EDE. Donald
E. Donald
Raquel AbaloRaquel Abalo
Raquel Abalo
JBJoel Bornstein
Joel Bornstein
KNK. Nurgali
K. Nurgali
Background: The use of the anticancer chemotherapeutic agent 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) is often limited by nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea; these side‐effects persist long after treatment. The effects of 5‐FU on enteric neurons have not been studied and may provide insight into the mechanisms underlying 5‐FU‐induced gastrointestinal dysfunction.Methods: Balb/c mice received intraperitoneal injections of 5‐FU (23 mg/kg) 3 times/week for 14 days. Gastrointestinal transit was analysed in vivo prior to and following 3, 7, and 14 days of 5‐FU treatment via serial x‐ray imaging. Following 14 days of 5‐FU administration, colons were collected for assessment of ex vivo colonic motility, gross morphological structure, and immunohistochemical analysis of myenteric neurons. Fecal lipocalin‐2 and CD45+ leukocytes in the colon were analysed as markers of intestinal inflammation.Key Results: Short‐term administration of 5‐FU (3 days) increased gastrointestinal transit, induced acute intestinal inflammation and reduced the proportion of neuronal nitric oxide synthase‐immunoreactive neurons. Long‐term treatment (7, 14 days) resulted in delayed gastrointestinal transit, inhibition of colonic migrating motor complexes, increased short and fragmented contractions, myenteric neuronal loss and a reduction in the number of ChAT‐immunoreactive neurons after the inflammation was resolved. Gross morphological damage to the colon was observed following both short‐ and long‐term 5‐FU treatment.Conclusions & Inferences: Our results indicate that 5‐FU induces accelerated gastrointestinal transit associated with acute intestinal inflammation at day 3 after the start of treatment, which may have led to persistent changes in the ENS observed after days 7 and 14 of treatment contributing to delayed gastrointestinal transit and colonic dysmotility.

6 December 2024 in GeroScience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJonathan Escalante
Jonathan Escalante
OAOlivia Artaiz
Olivia Artaiz
SDShanti Diwakarla
Shanti Diwakarla
RMRachel McQuade
Rachel McQuade
Global average life expectancy has steadily increased over the last several decades and is projected to reach ~ 77 years by 2050. As it stands, the number of people > 60 years currently outnumbers children younger than 5 years, and by 2050, it is anticipated that the global population of people aged > 60 years will double, surpassing 2.1 billion. This demographic shift in our population is expected to have substantial consequences on health services globally due to the disease burden associated with aging. Osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cognitive decline associated with dementia are among the most common age-related diseases and contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality in the aged population. Many of these age-related diseases have been linked to chronic low-grade systemic inflammation which often accompanies aging. Gastrointestinal barrier dysfunction, also known as “leaky gut,” has been shown to contribute to systemic inflammation in several diseases including inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome, but its role in the development and/or progression of chronic low-grade systemic inflammation during aging is unclear. This review outlines current literature on the leaky gut in aging, how leaky gut might contribute to systemic inflammation, and the links between gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases and common age-related diseases to provide insight into a potential relationship between the intestinal barrier and inflammation.