Yuhe Xia

Ms. Yuhe Xia

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBinita Shah
Binita Shah
MPMichael H. Pillinger
Michael H. Pillinger
HZHua Zhong
Hua Zhong
BCBruce Cronstein
Bruce Cronstein
YXYuhe Xia
Yuhe Xia
SKStuart D. Katz
Stuart D. Katz
Background: Vascular injury and inflammation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with increased risk of post-PCI adverse outcomes. Colchicine decreases neutrophil recruitment to sites of vascular injury. The anti-inflammatory effects of acute colchicine administration before PCI on subsequent myocardial injury are unknown. Methods: In a prospective, single-site trial, subjects referred for possible PCI (n=714) were randomized to acute preprocedural oral administration of colchicine 1.8 mg or placebo. Results: Among the 400 subjects who underwent PCI, the primary outcome of PCI-related myocardial injury did not differ between colchicine (n=206) and placebo (n=194) groups (57.3% versus 64.2%, P =0.19). The composite outcome of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 30 days (11.7% versus 12.9%, P =0.82), and the outcome of PCI-related myocardial infarction defined by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (2.9% versus 4.7%, P =0.49) did not differ between colchicine and placebo groups. Among 280 PCI subjects in a nested inflammatory biomarker substudy, the primary biomarker end point, change in interleukin-6 concentrations did not differ between groups 1-hour post-PCI but increased less 24 hours post-PCI in the colchicine (n=141) versus placebo group (n=139; 76% [−6 to 898] versus 338% [27 to 1264], P =0.02). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration also increased less after 24 hours in the colchicine versus placebo groups (11% [−14 to 80] versus 66% [1 to 172], P =0.001). Conclusions: Acute preprocedural administration of colchicine attenuated the increase in interleukin-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations after PCI when compared with placebo but did not lower the risk of PCI-related myocardial injury. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifiers: NCT02594111, NCT01709981.

10 September 2021 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TBTessa Barrett
Tessa Barrett
MCMacIntosh Cornwell
MacIntosh Cornwell
KMKhrystyna Myndzar
Khrystyna Myndzar
CRChristina C. Rolling
Christina C. Rolling
YXYuhe Xia
Yuhe Xia
JBJeffrey S. Berger
Jeffrey S. Berger
Platelet-derived MRP8/14 amplifies endotheliopathy in COVID-19.

10 November 2019 in Vascular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EYEugene Yuriditsky
Eugene Yuriditsky
OMOscar Jl Mitchell
Oscar Jl Mitchell
RSRachel A Sibley
Rachel A Sibley
YXYuhe Xia
Yuhe Xia
ASAkhilesh K Sista
Akhilesh K Sista
JHJames M Horowitz
James M Horowitz
The left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI) is an easily measured echocardiographic stroke volume index analog. Low values predict adverse outcomes in left ventricular failure. We postulate the left ventricular VTI may be a signal of right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism, and therefore a predictor of poor outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed echocardiograms on all Pulmonary Embolism Response Team activations at our institution at the time of pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Low LVOT VTI was defined as ⩽ 15 cm. We examined two composite outcomes: (1) in-hospital death or cardiac arrest; and (2) shock or need for primary reperfusion therapies. Sixty-one of 188 patients (32%) had a LVOT VTI of ⩽ 15 cm. Low VTI was associated with in-hospital death or cardiac arrest (odds ratio (OR) 6, 95% CI 2, 17.9; p = 0.0014) and shock or need for reperfusion (OR 23.3, 95% CI 6.6, 82.1; p < 0.0001). In a multivariable model, LVOT VTI ⩽ 15 remained significant for death or cardiac arrest (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.02, 11.9; p = 0.047) and for shock or need for reperfusion (OR 8.12, 95% CI 1.62, 40.66; p = 0.011). Among intermediate–high-risk patients, low VTI was the only variable associated with the composite outcome of death, cardiac arrest, shock, or need for reperfusion (OR 14, 95% CI 1.7, 118.4; p = 0.015). LVOT VTI is associated with adverse short-term outcomes in acute pulmonary embolism. The VTI may help risk stratify patients with intermediate–high-risk pulmonary embolism.

1 January 2020 in Atherosclerosis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSean P. Heffron
Sean P. Heffron
ADAeshita Dwivedi
Aeshita Dwivedi
CRCaron B. Rockman
Caron B. Rockman
YXYuhe Xia
Yuhe Xia
YGYu Guo
Yu Guo
JBJeffrey S. Berger
Jeffrey S. Berger

1 August 2019 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TWTanya Wilcox
Tanya Wilcox
NSNathaniel R. Smilowitz
Nathaniel R. Smilowitz
YXYuhe Xia
Yuhe Xia
JBJeffrey S. Berger
Jeffrey S. Berger
Background and Purpose—: Perioperative stroke is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Conventional cardiovascular risk scores have not been compared to predict acute stroke after noncardiac surgery. Methods—: Patients undergoing noncardiac surgery between 2009 and 2010 were identified from the US National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (n=540 717). Patients were prospectively followed for 30 days postoperatively for the primary outcome of stroke. Established cardiovascular and perioperative risk scores (CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, Revised Cardiac Risk Index, Mashour et al risk score, Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score, and National Quality Improvement Project American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator) were assessed to predict perioperative stroke. Results—: Stroke occurred in the perioperative period of 1474 noncardiac surgeries (0.27%). Patients with perioperative stroke were older, more frequently male, had lower body mass index, and were more likely to have undergone vascular surgery or neurosurgery than patients without stroke ( P <0.001 for each comparison). All risk prediction models were associated with increased risk of perioperative stroke (C statistic [AUC] range, 0.743–0.836). The Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score (AUC, 0.833) and American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator (AUC, 0.836) had the most favorable test characteristics and a greater ability to discriminate perioperative stroke when compared with Revised Cardiac Risk Index, CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, and Mashour risk scores ( P for comparison, <0.001; Delong). Risk scores did not provide consistent discriminative ability across surgery types and were least predictive in vascular surgery (AUC range, 0.588–0.672). Conclusions—: The Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score and American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator surgical risk scores provide excellent risk discrimination for perioperative stroke in most patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Stroke prediction was less optimal in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

1 June 2020 in The American Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMark V. Sherrid
Mark V. Sherrid
KRKatherine Riedy
Katherine Riedy
BRBarry Rosenzweig
Barry Rosenzweig
DMDaniele Massera
Daniele Massera
MSMuhamed Saric
Muhamed Saric
HRHarmony R. Reynolds
Harmony R. Reynolds