Stefanie Hessel-Pras

Dr. Stefanie Hessel-Pras

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 February 2016 in Archives of Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLClaudia Luckert
Claudia Luckert
CSChristina Schulz
Christina Schulz
NLNadja Lehmann
Nadja Lehmann
MTMaria Thomas
Maria Thomas
UHUte Hofmann
Ute Hofmann
SHStefanie Hessel-Pras
Stefanie Hessel-Pras

1 October 2013 in Toxicology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLClaudia Luckert
Claudia Luckert
AEAnke Ehlers
Anke Ehlers
TBThorsten Buhrke
Thorsten Buhrke
ASAlbrecht Seidel
Albrecht Seidel
ALAlfonso Lampen
Alfonso Lampen
SHStefanie Hessel-Pras
Stefanie Hessel-Pras

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLisa Gödtke
Lisa Gödtke
HSHeike Sprenger
Heike Sprenger
UHUte Hofmann
Ute Hofmann
FSFelix F. Schmidt
Felix F. Schmidt
HHHelen S. Hammer
Helen S. Hammer
SHStefanie Hessel-Pras
Stefanie Hessel-Pras
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are environmental pollutants produced by incomplete combustion of organic matter. They induce their own metabolism by upregulating xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes such as cytochrome P450 monooxygenase 1A1 (CYP1A1) by activating the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). However, previous studies showed that individual PAHs may also interact with the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). Here, we studied ten PAHs, different in carcinogenicity classification, for their potential to activate AHR- and CAR-dependent luciferase reporter genes in human liver cells. The majority of investigated PAHs activated AHR, while non-carcinogenic PAHs tended to activate CAR. We further characterized gene expression, protein abundancies and activities of the AHR targets CYP1A1 and 1A2, and the CAR target CYP2B6 in human HepaRG hepatoma cells. Enzyme induction patterns strongly resembled the profiles obtained at the receptor level, with AHR-activating PAHs inducing CYP1A1/1A2 and CAR-activating PAHs inducing CYP2B6. In summary, this study provides evidence that beside well-known activation of AHR, some PAHs also activate CAR, followed by subsequent expression of respective target genes. Furthermore, we found that an increased PAH ring number is associated with AHR activation as well as the induction of DNA double-strand breaks, whereas smaller PAHs activated CAR but showed no DNA-damaging potential.

25 March 2014 in Drug Metabolism Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
UGUrsula Gundert-Remy
Ursula Gundert-Remy
UBUlrike Bernauer
Ulrike Bernauer
BBBrunhilde Blömeke
Brunhilde Blömeke
BDBarbara Döring
Barbara Döring
EFEric Fabian
Eric Fabian
PRPeter H. Roos
Peter H. Roos
In general, xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes (XMEs) are expressed in lower levels in the extrahepatic tissues than in the liver, making the former less relevant for the clearance of xenobiotics. Local metabolism, however, may lead to tissue-specific adverse responses, e.g. organ toxicities, allergies or cancer. This review summarizes the knowledge on the expression of phase I and phase II XMEs and transporters in extrahepatic tissues at the body's internal–external interfaces. In the lung, CYPs of families 1, 2, 3 and 4 and epoxide hydrolases are important phase I enzymes, while conjugation is less relevant. In skin, phase I-related enzymatic reactions are considered less relevant. Predominant skin XMEs are phase II enzymes, whereby glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) 1, glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and N-acetyltransferase (NAT) 1 are important for detoxification. The intestinal epithelium expresses many transporters and phase I XME with high levels of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 and phase II metabolism is mainly related to UGT, NAT and Sulfotransferases (SULT). In the kidney, conjugation reactions and transporters play a major role for excretion processes. In the bladder, CYPs are relevant and among the phase II enzymes, NAT1 is involved in the activation of bladder carcinogens. Expression of XMEs is regulated by several mechanisms (nuclear receptors, epigenetic mechanisms, microRNAs). However, the understanding why XMEs are differently expressed in the various tissues is fragmentary. In contrast to the liver – where for most XMEs lower expression is demonstrated in early life – the XME ontogeny in the extrahepatic tissues remains to be investigated.

14 December 2018 in Mycotoxin Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHStefanie Hessel-Pras
Stefanie Hessel-Pras
JKJanine Kieshauer
Janine Kieshauer
GRGiana Roenn
Giana Roenn
CLClaudia Luckert
Claudia Luckert
ABAlbert Braeuning
Albert Braeuning
ALAlfonso Lampen
Alfonso Lampen

12 October 2019 in Archives of Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHStefanie Hessel-Pras
Stefanie Hessel-Pras
ABAlbert Braeuning
Albert Braeuning
GGGeorgia Guenther
Georgia Guenther
AAAlshaimaa Adawy
Alshaimaa Adawy
AEAnne-Margarethe Enge
Anne-Margarethe Enge
RRRaymond Reif
Raymond Reif