Carolina Eva Realini

Dr. Carolina Eva Realini

Senior Food Scientist. Consumer Food Systems. Innovation Centre of Excellence-Consumer Interface, AgResearch Limited, Palmerston North, New Zealand
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2014 in Meat Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CRCarolina Eva Realini
Carolina Eva Realini
BMBegonya Marcos Muntal
Begonya Marcos Muntal
Active and intelligent packaging systems are continuously evolving in response to growing challenges from a modern society. This article reviews: (1) the different categories of active and intelligent packaging concepts and currently available commercial applications, (2) latest packaging research trends and innovations, and (3) the growth perspectives of the active and intelligent packaging market. Active packaging aiming at extending shelf life or improving safety while maintaining quality is progressing towards the incorporation of natural active agents into more sustainable packaging materials. Intelligent packaging systems which monitor the condition of the packed food or its environment are progressing towards more cost-effective, convenient and integrated systems to provide innovative packaging solutions. Market growth is expected for active packaging with leading shares for moisture absorbers, oxygen scavengers, microwave susceptors and antimicrobial packaging. The market for intelligent packaging is also promising with strong gains for time-temperature indicator labels and advancements in the integration of intelligent concepts into packaging materials.

1 March 2004 in Meat Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRCarolina Eva Realini
Carolina Eva Realini
SDS.K. Duckett
S.K. Duckett
GBG.W. Brito
G.W. Brito
MRM. Dalla Rizza
M. Dalla Rizza
DMD. De Mattos
D. De Mattos

1 November 2003 in Meat Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYongliang Liu
Yongliang Liu
BLBrenda G Lyon
Brenda G Lyon
WWWilliam R Windham
William R Windham
CRCarolina Eva Realini
Carolina Eva Realini
TPT.DEan D Pringle
T.DEan D Pringle
SDSusan Duckett
Susan Duckett

1 July 2011 in Food Quality and Preference
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFMaria Font i Furnols
Maria Font i Furnols
CRCarolina Eva Realini
Carolina Eva Realini
FMF. Montossi
F. Montossi
CSC. Sañudo
C. Sañudo
María Del Mar CampoMaría Del Mar Campo
María Del Mar Campo
LGLuis Guerrero
Luis Guerrero

1 January 2014 in Meat Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVM. Vitale
M. Vitale
MPM. Pérez-Juan
M. Pérez-Juan
ELE. Lloret
E. Lloret
JAJ. Arnau
J. Arnau
CRCarolina Eva Realini
Carolina Eva Realini

1 December 2003 in Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJ. R. Sackmann
J. R. Sackmann
SDS. K. Duckett
S. K. Duckett
MGM. H. Gillis
M. H. Gillis
CRCarolina Eva Realini
Carolina Eva Realini
APA. H. Parks
A. H. Parks
RER. B. Eggelston
R. B. Eggelston
Six Hereford steers (295 kg) cannulated in the proximal duodenum were used to evaluate the effects of forage and sunflower oil level on ruminal biohydrogenation (BH) and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) outflow. Steers were fed one of six treatment diets in a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (grass hay level: 12, 24, or 36% of DM; and sunflower oil level: 2 or 4% of DM) in a 6 × 6 Latin square design. The remainder of the diet was made up of steam rolled corn and protein/mineral supplement. Duodenal samples were collected for 4 d following 10-d diet adaptation periods. Data were analyzed with animal, period, forage level, sunflower oil level, and two-way interaction between forage and sunflower oil level in the model. Dry matter intake showed a quadratic response (P < 0.04), with an increase in DMI as forage level increased from 12 to 24% followed by a decrease in DMI when 36% forage was fed. Flow of fatty acids at the duodenum was higher (P < 0.03) for 4 vs. 2% sunflower oil diets, and similar among forage levels. Apparent ruminal digestibility of NDF increased in a linear manner (P < 0.04) as dietary forage level increased. Ruminal BH of dietary unsaturated 18-C fatty acids, oleic acid, and linoleic acid increased linearly (P < 0.05) as dietary forage level increased. Linoleic acid BH tended (P < 0.07) to be greater for 4 than 2% sunflower oil level. Duodenal flow of pentadecyclic, stearic, linolenic, and arachidic acids increased linearly (P < 0.05) as dietary forage level increased from 12 to 36%. Duodenal flow of linoleic acid decreased in a linear manner (P < 0.03) with increasing dietary forage level. Flow of trans-10 octadecenoate decreased linearly (P < 0.03) as dietary forage level increased, whereas trans-11 vaccenic acid flow to the duodenum increased (P < 0.01) linearly with increased dietary forage. Dietary forage or sunflower oil levels did not alter the outflow of cis-9, trans-11 CLA. Flows of cis-11, trans-13, and cis-9, cis-11 CLA increased linearly (P < 0.05) with increased dietary forage. Flows of cis-11, cis-13, and trans-11, trans-13 CLA decreased linearly (P < 0.05) with increased dietary forage. Increasing dietary forage levels from 12 to 36% in beef cattle finishing diets increased BH of unsaturated 18-C fatty acid and outflow of trans-11 vaccenic acid to duodenum without altering cis-9, trans-11 CLA outflow.