Michael Monaghan

Dr. Michael Monaghan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2009 in Systematic Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMichael Monaghan
Michael Monaghan
RWRuth Wild
Ruth Wild
MEMiranda Elliot
Miranda Elliot
TFTomochika Fujisawa
Tomochika Fujisawa
MBMichael Balke
Michael Balke
AVAlfried P. Vogler
Alfried P. Vogler
High-throughput DNA sequencing has the potential to accelerate species discovery if it is able to recognize evolutionary entities from sequence data that are comparable to species. The general mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) model estimates the species boundary from DNA surveys by identifying independently evolving lineages as a transition from coalescent to speciation branching patterns on a phylogenetic tree. Applied here to 12 families from 4 orders of insects in Madagascar, we used the model to delineate 370 putative species from mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among 1614 individuals. These were compared with data from the nuclear genome and morphological identification and found to be highly congruent (98% and 94%). We developed a modified GMYC that allows for a variable transition from coalescent to speciation among lineages. This revised model increased the congruence with morphology (97%), suggesting that a variable threshold better reflects the clustering of sequence data into biological species. Local endemism was pronounced in all 5 insect groups. Most species (60–91%) and haplotypes (88–99%) were found at only 1 of the 5 study sites (40–1000 km apart). This pronounced endemism resulted in a 37% increase in species numbers using diagnostic nucleotides in a population aggregation analysis. Sample sizes between 7 and 10 individuals represented a threshold above which there was minimal increase in genetic diversity, broadly agreeing with coalescent theory and other empirical studies. Our results from > 1.4 Mb of empirical data suggest that the GMYC model captures species boundaries comparable to those from traditional methods without the need for prior hypotheses of population coherence. This provides a method of species discovery and biodiversity assessment using single-locus data from mixed or environmental samples while building a globally available taxonomic database for future identifications.

17 May 2011 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Laurent VuatazLaurent Vuataz
Laurent Vuataz
MSMichel Sartori
Michel Sartori
AWAndré Wagner
André Wagner
MMMichael Monaghan
Michael Monaghan
Aquatic larvae of many Rhithrogena mayflies (Ephemeroptera) inhabit sensitive Alpine environments. A number of species are on the IUCN Red List and many recognized species have restricted distributions and are of conservation interest. Despite their ecological and conservation importance, ambiguous morphological differences among closely related species suggest that the current taxonomy may not accurately reflect the evolutionary diversity of the group. Here we examined the species status of nearly 50% of European Rhithrogena diversity using a widespread sampling scheme of Alpine species that included 22 type localities, general mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) model analysis of one standard mtDNA marker and one newly developed nDNA marker, and morphological identification where possible. Using sequences from 533 individuals from 144 sampling localities, we observed significant clustering of the mitochondrial (cox1) marker into 31 GMYC species. Twenty-one of these could be identified based on the presence of topotypes (expertly identified specimens from the species' type locality) or unambiguous morphology. These results strongly suggest the presence of both cryptic diversity and taxonomic oversplitting in Rhithrogena. Significant clustering was not detected with protein-coding nuclear PEPCK, although nine GMYC species were congruent with well supported terminal clusters of nDNA. Lack of greater congruence in the two data sets may be the result of incomplete sorting of ancestral polymorphism. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of both gene regions recovered four of the six recognized Rhithrogena species groups in our samples as monophyletic. Future development of more nuclear markers would facilitate multi-locus analysis of unresolved, closely related species pairs. The DNA taxonomy developed here lays the groundwork for a future revision of the important but cryptic Rhithrogena genus in Europe.

7 March 2012 in Systematic Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJohannes Bergsten
Johannes Bergsten
DBDavid Bilton
David Bilton
TFTomochika Fujisawa
Tomochika Fujisawa
MEMiranda Elliott
Miranda Elliott
MMMichael Monaghan
Michael Monaghan
AVAlfried P. Vogler
Alfried P. Vogler
Eight years after DNA barcoding was formally proposed on a large scale, CO1 sequences are rapidly accumulating from around the world. While studies to date have mostly targeted local or regional species assemblages, the recent launch of the global iBOL project (International Barcode of Life), highlights the need to understand the effects of geographical scale on Barcoding's goals. Sampling has been central in the debate on DNA Barcoding, but the effect of the geographical scale of sampling has not yet been thoroughly and explicitly tested with empirical data. Here, we present a CO1 data set of aquatic predaceous diving beetles of the tribe Agabini, sampled throughout Europe, and use it to investigate how the geographic scale of sampling affects 1) the estimated intraspecific variation of species, 2) the genetic distance to the most closely related heterospecific, 3) the ratio of intraspecific and interspecific variation, 4) the frequency of taxonomically recognized species found to be monophyletic, and 5) query identification performance based on 6 different species assignment methods. Intraspecific variation was significantly correlated with the geographical scale of sampling (R-square = 0.7), and more than half of the species with 10 or more sampled individuals (N = 29) showed higher intraspecific variation than 1% sequence divergence. In contrast, the distance to the closest heterospecific showed a significant decrease with increasing geographical scale of sampling. The average genetic distance dropped from > 7% for samples within 1 km, to < 3.5% for samples up to > 6000 km apart. Over a third of the species were not monophyletic, and the proportion increased through locally, nationally, regionally, and continentally restricted subsets of the data. The success of identifying queries decreased with increasing spatial scale of sampling; liberal methods declined from 100% to around 90%, whereas strict methods dropped to below 50% at continental scales. The proportion of query identifications considered uncertain (more than one species < 1% distance from query) escalated from zero at local, to 50% at continental scale. Finally, by resampling the most widely sampled species we show that even if samples are collected to maximize the geographical coverage, up to 70 individuals are required to sample 95% of intraspecific variation. The results show that the geographical scale of sampling has a critical impact on the global application of DNA barcoding. Scale-effects result from the relative importance of different processes determining the composition of regional species assemblages (dispersal and ecological assembly) and global clades (demography, speciation, and extinction). The incorporation of geographical information, where available, will be required to obtain identification rates at global scales equivalent to those in regional barcoding studies. Our result hence provides an impetus for both smarter barcoding tools and sprouting national barcoding initiatives—smaller geographical scales deliver higher accuracy.

29 May 2014 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ETEmmanuel F. A. Toussaint
Emmanuel F. A. Toussaint
RHRobert Hall
Robert Hall
MMMichael Monaghan
Michael Monaghan
KSKatayo Sagata
Katayo Sagata
SISentiko Ibalim
Sentiko Ibalim
MBMichael Balke
Michael Balke

1 April 2014 in Molecular Ecology Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGM. F. Geiger
M. F. Geiger
FHF. Herder
F. Herder
MMMichael Monaghan
Michael Monaghan
VAV. Almada
V. Almada
RBR. Barbieri
R. Barbieri
JFJ. Freyhof
J. Freyhof

16 February 2004 in Oikos
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PGPaul.S. Giller
Paul.S. Giller
HHHelmut Hillebrand
Helmut Hillebrand
UBUlrike‐G. Berninger
Ulrike‐G. Berninger
MGMark O. Gessner
Mark O. Gessner
SHStephen Hawkins
Stephen Hawkins
GOGregory O'Mullan
Gregory O'Mullan