Alan Baker

Prof. Alan Baker

The University of Melbourne, Australia
+4

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2004 in Restoration Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWS. N. Whiting
S. N. Whiting
RRR. D. Reeves
R. D. Reeves
DRD. Richards
D. Richards
MJM. S. Johnson
M. S. Johnson
JCJ. A. Cooke
J. A. Cooke
ABAlan Baker
Alan Baker
Plants that have evolved to survive on metal‐rich soils—metallophytes—have key values that must drive research of their unique properties and ultimately their conservation. The ability of metallophytes to tolerate extreme metal concentrations commends them for revegetation of mines and metal‐contaminated sites. Metallophytes can also be exploited in environmental technologies, for example, phytostabilization, phytoremediation, and phytomining. Actions towards conserving metallophyte species are imperative, as metallophytes are increasingly under threat of extinction from mining activity. Although many hundreds of papers describe both the biology and applications of metallophytes, few have investigated the urgent need to conserve these unique species. This paper identifies the current state of metallophyte research, and advocates future research needs for the conservation of metallophyte biodiversity and the sustainable uses of metallophyte species in restoration, rehabilitation, contaminated site remediation, and other nascent phytotechnologies. Six fundamental questions are addressed: (1) Is enough known about the global status of metallophytes to ensure their conservation? (2) Are metallophytes threatened by the activities of the minerals industry, and can their potential for the restoration or rehabilitation of mined and disturbed land be realized? (3) What problems exist in gaining prior informed consent to access metallophyte genetic resources and how can the benefits arising from their uses be equitably shared? (4) What potential do metallophytes offer as a resource base for phytotechnologies? (5) Can genetic modification be used to “design” metallophytes to use in the remediation of contaminated land? (6) Does the prospect of using metallophytes in site remediation and restoration raise ethical issues?

3 December 2005 in JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DCDamien Callahan
Damien Callahan
ABAlan Baker
Alan Baker
Spas Dimitrov KolevSpas Dimitrov Kolev
Spas Dimitrov Kolev
AWAnthony G. Wedd
Anthony G. Wedd

18 June 2002 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAlan Baker
Alan Baker
SWSteven N. Whiting
Steven N. Whiting
Click on the article title to read more.

14 March 2005 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNaveen P. Bhatia
Naveen P. Bhatia
Kerry Brian WalshKerry Brian Walsh
Kerry Brian Walsh
ABAlan Baker
Alan Baker
Field-collected, young plants of Ni hyperaccumulator Stackhousia tryonii, grown in a glasshouse for 20 weeks, were exposed to low- (available Ni concentration in the native serpentine soil, i.e. 60 μg g−1 dry soil) and high- (external application of 1000 ppm) Ni concentrations in the substrate. Nickel concentration in the freeze-dried leaf tissues increased from 3700 μg g−1 to 13 700 μg g−1 with soil Ni supplementation, of which >60% was extracted with dilute acid (0.025 M HCl). Nickel supplementation also elicited a 575%, 211%, and 37% increase in the final concentrations of oxalic, citric, and malic acids, respectively, in leaf tissues. Malic acid was the dominant organic acid, followed by citric and oxalic acids. The molar ratio of Ni to malic acid was 1.0, consistent with a role for malate as a ligand for Ni in hyperaccumulating plants, supporting detoxification/transport and storage of this heavy metal in S. tryonii. The total amino acid concentrations in the xylem sap did not change with Ni supplementation (21.7±3.7 mM and 17.9±5 mM, respectively, for low- and high-nickel-treated plants). Glutamine was the major amino acid in both the low- and high-Ni-treated plants. The concentration of glutamine decreased by >60%, with a corresponding increase in alanine, aspartic acid, and glutamic acid, on exposure to high Ni. A role of amino acids in Ni complexation and transport in S. tryonii is not immediately apparent.

14 March 2003 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWS. N. Whiting
S. N. Whiting
PNP. M. Neumann
P. M. Neumann
ABAlan Baker
Alan Baker

5 July 2006 in Planta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TATahmaseb Asemaneh
Tahmaseb Asemaneh
SGS. M. Ghaderian
S. M. Ghaderian
SCS. A. Crawford
S. A. Crawford
AMA. T. Marshall
A. T. Marshall
ABAlan Baker
Alan Baker