Paul Williamson

Dr. Paul Williamson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in Psychological Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IOIvana Osenk
Ivana Osenk
PWPaul Williamson
Paul Williamson
TWTracey Wade
Tracey Wade
Confusion exists about the construct of perfectionism, considered to consist of perfectionistic strivings (PS) and perfectionistic concerns (PC). Recent theory suggests that pursuit of excellence is related to PS but differentiated by having a more positive impact. To test this hypothesis, we used a meta-analytic analysis to examine the associations between different measures of perfectionism and academic achievement. Correlations between academic measures (performance, academic burnout and stress, test anxiety, procrastination, self-efficacy, engagement, satisfaction, adjustment, hardiness, learning strategies) and subscales of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, Hewitt Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, Almost Perfect Scale-Revised, and Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale were investigated in students (Mage = 19.31, SD = 4.26). A systematic literature search yielded 67 studies (378 effect sizes). Subscales relating to standards (High Standards, Personal Standards, Self-Oriented Perfectionism) were positively related to academic performance and helpful academic outcomes. Only High Standards, which has a focus on striving for excellence, had negative associations with unhelpful academic outcomes. Two of the four subscales that measured PC (Discrepancy, Doubts about Actions) were negatively related to academic performance, and Discrepancy shared a negative association with helpful academic outcomes. All PC subscales were positively associated with unhelpful academic outcomes. As such, PC are maladaptive for successful learning and a distinction between PS and healthy pursuit of excellence is worth further exploration. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

18 May 2011 in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAlyssa C. P. Sawyer
Alyssa C. P. Sawyer
PWPaul Williamson
Paul Williamson
RYRobyn L. Young
Robyn L. Young

14 May 2015 in Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCaitlin Hitchcock
Caitlin Hitchcock
AEAlicia A. Ellis
Alicia A. Ellis
PWPaul Williamson
Paul Williamson
RNReginald D. V. Nixon
Reginald D. V. Nixon
Although both social support and cognitive appraisals are strong predictors of children’s posttraumatic adjustment, understanding of the interplay between these factors is limited. We assessed whether cognitive appraisals mediated the relationship between social support and symptom development, as predicted by cognitive models of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Ninety seven children (Mean age = 12.08 years) were assessed at one month and six months following a single incident trauma. We administered self-report measures of cognitive appraisals, social support, and a diagnostic interview for PTSD. Results indicated that cognitive appraisals at one month post-trauma mediated the relationship between social support at one month post-trauma, and PTSD severity at follow-up. Differences in this relationship were observed between child-reported social support and parent-rated ability to provide support. Firm evidence was provided for the application of cognitive models of PTSD to children.

1 August 2018 in Behaviour Research and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJShevaugn Johnson
Shevaugn Johnson
PWPaul Williamson
Paul Williamson
TWTracey Wade
Tracey Wade

24 November 2013 in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAlyssa C. P. Sawyer
Alyssa C. P. Sawyer
PWPaul Williamson
Paul Williamson
RYRobyn Young
Robyn Young

1 July 2024 in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GMGeorgina A. Maddox
Georgina A. Maddox
GBGlen E. Bodner
Glen E. Bodner
MCMatthew W. Christian
Matthew W. Christian
PWPaul Williamson
Paul Williamson
Arts therapy is a popular intervention used to work through the effects of traumatic experience. We evaluate previous reviews and report a meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of arts therapy following trauma for reducing symptoms of PTSD, enhancing positive outcomes (e.g., quality of life) and decreasing negative outcomes (e.g., depression). Database searches identified 21 (N = 868) randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes were categorised as PTSD specific, positive non‐PTSD specific and negative non‐PTSD specific. Several moderators were tested: age, diagnosis type, trauma type, intervention instruction, control type, therapy mode and therapy duration. Overall, random‐effects analysis indicated that arts therapy was favoured relative to control for positive non‐PTSD‐specific outcomes (g = 1.53, p < 0.001), but not for negative non‐PTSD‐specific (p = 0.069) or PTSD‐specific outcomes (g = 0.89, p = 0.052). Regression analyses indicated that arts therapy was effective in reducing PTSD‐specific outcomes in children (Z = 2.81, df = 1, p = 0.005), positive non‐PTSD‐specific outcomes in group‐based arts therapy (Z = −2.40, df = 1, p = 0.016, I2 = 57.33) and for reducing negative non‐PTSD outcomes following acute traumas (e.g., combat‐related trauma or sexual abuse) (Q = 10.70, df = 3, p = 0.013, I2 = 77.09). We highlight the need for additional RCTs and standardised protocols to address heterogeneity. Our review provides an important benchmark for gauging the effectiveness of arts therapy in the treatment of trauma.