See also the Commentary on this article by Jaffré et al., 218: 397–400.

The increase in heavy metal terrestrial ecosystems’ contamination through anthropogenic activities is a widespread and serious global problem due to their various environmental and human implications. For these reasons, several techniques, including phytoremediation of heavy metals, have been extensively studied. In spite of significant recent advancement, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)-enhanced heavy metal phytoextraction as well as related ecological risks are still topical and remain an important area of research. In fact, EDTA favors the solubilization of metals and metalloids in soils, and was therefore extensively studied during the last two decades in order to improve phytoextraction efficiency and reduce treatment duration. This review highlights the recent findings (2010–2012) and mechanisms behind EDTA-enhanced (1) solubilization of heavy metals in soil, (2) mobilization/transport of soluble metals towards plant root zone, and (3) metal absorption by plant roots and translocation towards aerial parts. The review also presents potential risks associated with EDTA-enhanced phytoextraction: (1) environmental persistence of EDTA and/or metal-EDTA complex; (2) potential toxicity of EDTA and/or metal-EDTA complex to plants; and (3) leaching and contamination of groundwater. Moreover, field-scale cost of EDTA-enhanced remediation and the role of EDTA in time required for heavy metal remediation is discussed.

Large ultramafic areas exist in Albania, which could be suitable for phytomining with native Alyssum murale. We undertook a five-year field experiment on an ultramafic Vertisol, aimed at optimizing a low-cost Ni-phytoextraction crop of A. murale which is adapted to the Balkans. The following aspects were studied on 18-m² plots in natural conditions: the effect of (i) plant phenology and element distribution, (ii) plant nutrition and fertilization, (iii) plant cover and weed control and (iv), planting technique (natural cover vs. sown crop). The optimal harvest time was set at the mid-flowering stage when Ni concentration and biomass yield were highest. The application of N, P, and K fertilizers, and especially a split 100-kg ha⁻¹ N application, increased the density of A. murale against all other species. It significantly increased shoot yield, without reducing Ni concentration. In natural stands, the control of graminaceous weeds required the use of an anti-monocots herbicide. However, after the optimization of fertilization and harvest time, weed control procured little benefit. Finally, cropping sown A. murale was more efficient than enhancing native stands and gave higher biomass and phytoextraction yields; biomass yields progressively improved from 0.3 to 9.0 t ha⁻¹ and phytoextracted Ni increased from 1.7 to 105 kg ha⁻¹.