The decarbonization problem of maritime transport and new restrictions on CO2 emissions (MARPOL Annex VI Chapter 4, COM (2021)562) have prompted the development and practical implementation of new decarbonization solutions. One of them, along with the use of renewable fuels, is the waste heat recovery of secondary heat sources from a ship’s main engine, whose energy potential reaches 45–55%. The organic Rankine cycle (ORC), which uses low-boiling organic working fluids, is considered one of the most promising and energy-efficient solutions for ship conditions. However, there remains uncertainty when choosing a rational cycle configuration, taking into account the energy consumption efficiency indicators of various low-temperature (cylinder cooling jacket and scavenging air cooling) and high-temperature (exhaust gas) secondary heat source combinations while the engine operates within the operational load range. It is also rational, especially at the initial stage, to evaluate possible constraints of ship technological systems for ORC implementation on the ship. The numerical investigation of these practical aspects of ORC applicability was conducted with widely used marine medium-speed diesel engines, such as the Wartsila 12V46F. Comprehensive waste heat recovery of all secondary heat sources in ORC provides a potential increase in the energy efficiency of the main engine by 13.5% to 21% in the engine load range of 100% to 25% of nominal power, while individual heat sources only achieve 3% to 8%. The average increase in energy efficiency over the operating cycle according to test cycles for the type approval engines ranges from 8% to 15% compared to 3% to 6.5%. From a practical implementation perspective, the most attractive potential for energy recovery is from the scavenging air cooling system, which, both separately (5% compared to 6.5% during the engine’s operating cycle) and in conjunction with other WHR sources, approaches the highest level of exhaust gas potential. The choice of a rational ORC structure for WHR composition allowed for achieving a waste heat recovery system energy efficiency coefficient of 15%. Based on the studied experimental and analytical relationships between the ORC (generated mechanical energy) energy performance () and the technological constraints of shipboard systems (), ranges for the use of secondary heat sources in diesel operational characteristic modes have been identified according to technological limits.
The publication research task is related to one of the solution aspects in reference to decarbonization of transport by transferring the operation of diesel engines to natural gas. The results of converted diesel engines into operation with dual-fuel (D-NG) without significant constructive modifications are focused on forecasting the energy efficiency parameters of in-service engine models and evaluation of the reserves improvement. This paper presents energy efficiency parameters and characteristics of the combustion cycle methodological optimization of high-speed 79.5/95.5 mm diesel engine with a conventional fuel injection system. Interrelations between the indicated efficiency (ηi), combustion cycle performance parameters (excess air ratio (α), compression ratio (ε), degree of pressure increase in the cylinder (λ), maximum cycle pressure (pmax), air pressure (pk), air temperature (Tk) after compression, etc.), and heat release characteristics were determined and researched. Directions of the optimization when the engines were operating in a wide range of load (pmi) modes were also obtained: the low energy efficiency in the low-load mode were due to reduced heat release dynamics (combustion time increased up to 200° CA). The main influencing factors for ηi were the pilot-injection portion phase (φinj) and α, optimization of ε was inefficient. To avoid exceeding the permissible limits of reliability for pmax, the realized reserve of ηi increase was estimated as 10%. Methodological tools for the practical application of parametric analysis to the conversion of diesel to dual-fuel operation have been developed and adapted in the form of a numerical modeling algorithm, which was presented in nomogram form. For improvement of initial energy parameters for a specific engine models heat release characteristics identification, accurate methods must be used. The proposed methodology is seen as a theoretical tool for a dual-fuel conversion models for in-service engines and has benefit of a practical use of a fast application in the industrial field.
Solving strategic IMO tasks for the decarbonization of maritime transport and the dynamics of its controlling indicators (EEDI, EEXI, CII) involves the comprehensive use of renewable and low-carbon fuels (LNG, biodiesel, methanol in the mid-term perspective of 2030, ammonia, and hydrogen to achieve zero emissions by 2050) and energy-saving technologies. The technology of regenerating secondary heat sources of the ship’s power plant WHR in the form of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) is considered one of the most promising solutions. The attractiveness of the ORC is justified by the share of the energy potential of WHR at 45–50%, almost half of which are low-temperature WHR (80–90 °C and below). However, according to DNV GL, the widespread adoption of WHR-ORC technologies, especially on operating ships, is hindered by the statistical lack of system prototypes combined with the high cost of implementation. Developing methodological tools for justifying the energy efficiency indicators of WHR–ORC cycle implementation is relevant at all stages of design. The methodological solutions proposed in this article are focused on the initial stages of comparative evaluation of alternative structural solutions (without the need to use detailed technical data of the ship’s systems, power plant, and ORC nodes), expected indicators of energy efficiency, and cycle performance. The development is based on generalized results of variation studies of the ORC in the structure of the widely used main marine medium-speed diesel engine Wärtsilä 12V46F (14,400 kW, 500 min−1) in the operational load cycle range of 25–100% of nominal power. The algorithm of the proposed solutions is based on the established interrelationship of the components of the ORC energy balance in the P-h diagram field of thermodynamic indicators of the cycle working fluid (R134a was used). The implemented strategy does allow, in graphical form, for justifying the choice of working fluid and evaluating the energy performance and efficiency of alternative WHR sources for the main engine, taking into account the design solutions of the power turbine and the technological constraints of the ORC condensation system. The verification of the developed methodological solutions is served by the results of comprehensive variation studies of the ORC performed by the authors using the professionally oriented thermoengineering tool “Thermoflow” and the specification data of Wärtsilä 12V46F with an achieved increase in energy efficiency indicators by 21.4–7%.