Introduction: Defects in the DNA damage response (DDR) drive the development of cancer by fostering DNA mutation but also provide cancer-specific vulnerabilities that can be exploited therapeutically. The recent approval of three different PARP inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer provides the impetus for further developing targeted inhibitors of many of the kinases involved in the DDR, including inhibitors of ATR, ATM, CHEK1, CHEK2, DNAPK and WEE1. Areas covered: We summarise the current stage of development of these novel DDR kinase inhibitors, and describe which predictive biomarkers might be exploited to direct their clinical use. Expert opinion: Novel DDR inhibitors present promising candidates in cancer treatment and have the potential to elicit synthetic lethal effects. In order to fully exploit their potential and maximize their utility, identifying highly penetrant predictive biomarkers of single agent and combinatorial DDR inhibitor sensitivity are critical. Identifying the optimal drug combination regimens that could used with DDR inhibitors is also a key objective.

Opinion Statement Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare, yet highly malignant, type of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), for which survival has not improved significantly during the past years. In this review, we focus on systemic treatment in adults. Compared to other STS, SS are relatively chemosensitive. Ifosfamide and ifosfamide combinations are active in different lines of treatment. In high-risk extremity and chest wall STS, neoadjuvant doxorubicin and ifosfamide has shown as much activity as high-dose ifosfamide. There are indications that combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide in this setting improves outcome. In the first-line metastatic setting, combination treatment with doxorubicin and ifosfamide is a preferred option in fit patients, while in other patients, sequential doxorubicin and ifosfamide can be considered. In second and later lines, pazopanib and trabectedin have shown activity. Many new approaches to treat metastatic SS are currently under investigation, both preclinical as well as clinical, including other receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, epigenetic modulators, compounds interfering with DNA damage response (DDR), and immunotherapy.

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an aggressive soft-tissue malignancy characterized by expression of SS18–SSX fusions, where treatment options are limited. To identify therapeutically actionable genetic dependencies in SS, we performed a series of parallel, high-throughput small interfering RNA (siRNA) screens and compared genetic dependencies in SS tumor cells with those in >130 non–SS tumor cell lines. This approach revealed a reliance of SS tumor cells upon the DNA damage response serine/threonine protein kinase ATR. Clinical ATR inhibitors (ATRi) elicited a synthetic lethal effect in SS tumor cells and impaired growth of SS patient-derived xenografts. Oncogenic SS18–SSX family fusion genes are known to alter the composition of the BAF chromatin–remodeling complex, causing ejection and degradation of wild-type SS18 and the tumor suppressor SMARCB1. Expression of oncogenic SS18–SSX fusion proteins caused profound ATRi sensitivity and a reduction in SS18 and SMARCB1 protein levels, but an SSX18–SSX1 Δ71–78 fusion containing a C-terminal deletion did not. ATRi sensitivity in SS was characterized by an increase in biomarkers of replication fork stress (increased γH2AX, decreased replication fork speed, and increased R-loops), an apoptotic response, and a dependence upon cyclin E expression. Combinations of cisplatin or PARP inhibitors enhanced the antitumor cell effect of ATRi, suggesting that either single-agent ATRi or combination therapy involving ATRi might be further assessed as candidate approaches for SS treatment. Cancer Res; 77(24); 7014–26. ©2017 AACR.

Because novel therapeutic options are limited in Ewing sarcomas (ES), we investigated the expression, genetic aberrations and clinical relevance of MET and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) in ES and determined the relevance of targeting these receptors. MET and ALK protein expression was determined immunohistochemically in 31 (50 samples) and 36 (59 samples) ES patients, respectively. Samples included primary tumors, postchemotherapy resections, metastases and relapses. MET and ALK RTK domains were sequenced in respectively 33 and 32 tumors. Five ES cell lines were treated in vitro with the MET/ALK‐inhibitor crizotinib, the ALK‐inhibitor NVP‐TAE684 or the MET‐inhibitor cabozantinib and analyzed by MTT assays. Modest to high MET and ALK expression was detected in the majority of ES (86 and 69%, respectively). ALK expression was significantly lower in postchemotherapy resections compared to paired untreated primary tumors (p = 0.031, z = −2.310, n = 11). In primary tumors (n = 20), membranous MET expression significantly correlated with a poor overall survival (OS) (60 vs. 197 months, p = 0.014). There was a trend toward a poor event‐free survival (67 vs. 111 months, p = 0.078) and OS (88 vs. 128 months, p = 0.074) in patients with highest ALK levels (n = 29). ALK or MET RTK domain aberrations were demonstrated in 5/32 (16%) and 3/33 (9%) tumors, respectively. Crizotinib (IC₅₀ 1.22–3.59 μmol/L), NVP‐TAE684 (IC₅₀ 0.15–0.79 μmol/L) and cabozantinib (IC₅₀ 2.69–8.27 μmol/L) affected ES cell viability in vitro. Altogether, our data suggest that MET and ALK are potential novel therapeutic targets in ES and targeting these receptors may be of great interest to rationally design future studies in ES.

Targeted therapies, including antibodies, are becoming increasingly important in cancer therapy. Important limitations, however, are that not every patient benefits from a specific antibody therapy and that responses could be short‐lived due to acquired resistance. In addition, targeted therapies are quite expensive and are not completely devoid of side‐effects. This urges the need for accurate patient selection and response monitoring.An important step towards personalizing antibody treatment could be the implementation of theranostics. Antibody theranostics combine the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of an antibody, thereby selecting those patients who are most likely to benefit from antibody treatment. This review focuses on the clinical application of theranostic antibodies in oncology. It provides detailed information concerning the suitability of antibodies for theranostics, the different types of theranostic tests available and summarizes the efficacy of theranostic antibodies used in current clinical practice. Advanced theranostic applications, including radiolabeled antibodies for non‐invasive functional imagining, are also addressed. Finally, we discuss the importance of theranostics in the emerging field of personalized medicine and critically evaluate recent data to determine the best way to apply antibody theranostics in the future.