Georg Langs

Dr. Georg Langs

Medizinische Universitat Wien, Vienna, Austria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 October 2016 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDaniel S. Margulies
Daniel S. Margulies
SGSatrajit S. Ghosh
Satrajit S. Ghosh
AGAlexandros Goulas
Alexandros Goulas
MFMarcel Falkiewicz
Marcel Falkiewicz
JHJulia M. Huntenburg
Julia M. Huntenburg
JSJonathan Smallwood
Jonathan Smallwood
Significance: We describe an overarching organization of large-scale connectivity that situates the default-mode network at the opposite end of a spectrum from primary sensory and motor regions. This topography, based on the differentiation of connectivity patterns, is also embedded in the spatial distance along the cortical surface between these respective systems. In addition, this connectivity gradient accounts for the respective positions of canonical networks and captures a functional spectrum from perception and action to more abstract cognitive functions. These results suggest that the default-mode network consists of regions at the top of a representational hierarchy that describe the current cognitive landscape in the most abstract terms.

23 May 2017
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
TSThomas Schlegl
Thomas Schlegl
PSPhilipp Seeböck
Philipp Seeböck
SWSebastian M. Waldstein
Sebastian M. Waldstein
USUrsula Schmidt-Erfurth
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
GLGeorg Langs
Georg Langs

1 May 2019 in Medical Image Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSThomas Schlegl
Thomas Schlegl
PSPhilipp Seeböck
Philipp Seeböck
SWSebastian M. Waldstein
Sebastian M. Waldstein
GLGeorg Langs
Georg Langs
USUrsula Schmidt-Erfurth
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth

20 August 2020 in European Radiology Experimental
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJohannes Hofmanninger
Johannes Hofmanninger
FPForian Prayer
Forian Prayer
JPJeanny Pan
Jeanny Pan
SRSebastian Röhrich
Sebastian Röhrich
HPHelmut Prosch
Helmut Prosch
GLGeorg Langs
Georg Langs
Background: Automated segmentation of anatomical structures is a crucial step in image analysis. For lung segmentation in computed tomography, a variety of approaches exists, involving sophisticated pipelines trained and validated on different datasets. However, the clinical applicability of these approaches across diseases remains limited. Methods: We compared four generic deep learning approaches trained on various datasets and two readily available lung segmentation algorithms. We performed evaluation on routine imaging data with more than six different disease patterns and three published data sets. Results: Using different deep learning approaches, mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) on test datasets varied not over 0.02. When trained on a diverse routine dataset (n = 36), a standard approach (U-net) yields a higher DSC (0.97 ± 0.05) compared to training on public datasets such as the Lung Tissue Research Consortium (0.94 ± 0.13, p = 0.024) or Anatomy 3 (0.92 ± 0.15, p = 0.001). Trained on routine data (n = 231) covering multiple diseases, U-net compared to reference methods yields a DSC of 0.98 ± 0.03 versus 0.94 ± 0.12 (p = 0.024). Conclusions: The accuracy and reliability of lung segmentation algorithms on demanding cases primarily relies on the diversity of the training data, highlighting the importance of data diversity compared to model choice. Efforts in developing new datasets and providing trained models to the public are critical. By releasing the trained model under General Public License 3.0, we aim to foster research on lung diseases by providing a readily available tool for segmentation of pathological lungs.

1 April 2018 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TSThomas Schlegl
Thomas Schlegl
SWSebastian M. Waldstein
Sebastian M. Waldstein
HBHrvoje Bogunović
Hrvoje Bogunović
FEFranz Endstraßer
Franz Endstraßer
ASAmir Sadeghipour
Amir Sadeghipour
USUrsula Schmidt-Erfurth
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
Development and validation of a fully automated method to detect and quantify macular fluid in conventional OCT images. Development of a diagnostic modality. The clinical dataset for fluid detection consisted of 1200 OCT volumes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD, n = 400), diabetic macular edema (DME, n = 400), or retinal vein occlusion (RVO, n = 400) acquired with Zeiss Cirrus (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) (n = 600) or Heidelberg Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) (n = 600) OCT devices. A method based on deep learning to automatically detect and quantify intraretinal cystoid fluid (IRC) and subretinal fluid (SRF) was developed. The performance of the algorithm in accurately identifying fluid localization and extent was evaluated against a manual consensus reading of 2 masked reading center graders. Performance of a fully automated method to accurately detect, differentiate, and quantify intraretinal and SRF using area under the receiver operating characteristics curves, precision, and recall. The newly designed, fully automated diagnostic method based on deep learning achieved optimal accuracy for the detection and quantification of IRC for all 3 macular pathologies with a mean accuracy (AUC) of 0.94 (range, 0.91-0.97), a mean precision of 0.91, and a mean recall of 0.84. The detection and measurement of SRF were also highly accurate with an AUC of 0.92 (range, 0.86-0.98), a mean precision of 0.61, and a mean recall of 0.81, with superior performance in neovascular AMD and RVO compared with DME, which was represented rarely in the population studied. High linear correlation was confirmed between automated and manual fluid localization and quantification, yielding an average Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.90 for IRC and of 0.96 for SRF. Deep learning in retinal image analysis achieves excellent accuracy for the differential detection of retinal fluid types across the most prevalent exudative macular diseases and OCT devices. Furthermore, quantification of fluid achieves a high level of concordance with manual expert assessment. Fully automated analysis of retinal OCT images from clinical routine provides a promising horizon in improving accuracy and reliability of retinal diagnosis for research and clinical practice in ophthalmology.

9 November 2015 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDanhong Wang
Danhong Wang
RBRandy L Buckner
Randy L Buckner
MFMichael D Fox
Michael D Fox
DHDaphne J Holt
Daphne J Holt
AHAvram J Holmes
Avram J Holmes
HLHesheng Liu
Hesheng Liu
A cortical parcellation technique accurately maps functional organization in individual brains. Functional networks mapped by this approach are highly reproducible and effectively capture individual variability. The algorithm performs well across different populations and data types and is validated by invasive cortical stimulation mapping in surgical patients. The capacity to identify the unique functional architecture of an individual's brain is a crucial step toward personalized medicine and understanding the neural basis of variation in human cognition and behavior. Here we developed a cortical parcellation approach to accurately map functional organization at the individual level using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). A population-based functional atlas and a map of inter-individual variability were employed to guide the iterative search for functional networks in individual subjects. Functional networks mapped by this approach were highly reproducible within subjects and effectively captured the variability across subjects, including individual differences in brain lateralization. The algorithm performed well across different subject populations and data types, including task fMRI data. The approach was then validated by invasive cortical stimulation mapping in surgical patients, suggesting potential for use in clinical applications.