GALLOT Denis

Prof. GALLOT Denis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2019 in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSThomas Schmitz
Thomas Schmitz
LSLoïc Sentilhes
Loïc Sentilhes
ELElsa Lorthe
Elsa Lorthe
GDGALLOT Denis
GALLOT Denis
HMHugo Madar
Hugo Madar
GKGilles Kayem
Gilles Kayem

1 September 2020 in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLoic SENTILHES
Loic SENTILHES
TSThomas Schmitz
Thomas Schmitz
EAElie Azria
Elie Azria
GDGALLOT Denis
GALLOT Denis
GDGuillaume Ducarme
Guillaume Ducarme
EVEric Verspyck
Eric Verspyck

11 February 2021 in PLOS Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDCaroline Diguisto
Caroline Diguisto
AGAmélie Le Gouge
Amélie Le Gouge
CAChloé Arthuis
Chloé Arthuis
NWNorbert Winer
Norbert Winer
OPOlivier Parant
Olivier Parant
F(For The Groupe de Recherche En Obstétrique Et Gynécologie (Grog)
For The Groupe de Recherche En Obstétrique Et Gynécologie (Grog)
Background: Prolonged pregnancies are a frequent indication for induction of labour. When the cervix is unfavourable, cervical ripening before oxytocin administration is recommended to increase the likelihood of vaginal delivery, but no particular method is currently recommended for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies. This trial evaluates whether the use of mechanical cervical ripening with a silicone double balloon catheter for induction of labour in prolonged pregnancies reduces the cesarean section rate for nonreassuring fetal status compared with pharmacological cervical ripening by a vaginal pessary for the slow release of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). Methods and findings: This is a multicentre, superiority, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted in 15 French maternity units. Women with singleton pregnancies, a vertex presentation, ≥41+0 and ≤42+0 weeks’ gestation, a Bishop score <6, intact membranes, and no history of cesarean delivery for whom induction of labour was decided were randomised to either mechanical cervical ripening with a Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon or pharmacological cervical ripening by a Propess vaginal pessary serving as a prostaglandin E2 slow-release system. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean for nonreassuring fetal status, with an independent endpoint adjudication committee determining whether the fetal heart rate was nonreassuring. Secondary outcomes included delivery (time from cervical ripening to delivery, number of patients requiring analgesics), maternal and neonatal outcomes. Between January 2017 and December 2018, 1,220 women were randomised in a 1:1 ratio, 610 allocated to a silicone double balloon catheter, and 610 to the Propess vaginal pessary for the slow release of dinoprostone. The mean age of women was 31 years old, and 80% of them were of white ethnicity. The cesarean rates for nonreassuring fetal status were 5.8% (35/607) in the mechanical ripening group and 5.3% (32/609) in the pharmacological ripening group (proportion difference: 0.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) −2.1% to 3.1%, p = 0.70). Time from cervical ripening to delivery was shorter in the pharmacological ripening group (23 hours versus 32 hours, median difference 6.5 95% CI 5.0 to 7.9, p < 0.001), and fewer women required analgesics in the mechanical ripening group (27.5% versus 35.4%, difference in proportion −7.9%, 95% CI −13.2% to −2.7%, p = 0.003). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for other delivery, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. A limitation was a low observed rate of cesarean section. Conclusions: In this study, we observed no difference in the rates of cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status between mechanical ripening with a silicone double balloon catheter and pharmacological cervical ripening with a pessary for the slow release of dinoprostone. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02907060.

26 May 2011 in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSébastien Bros
Sébastien Bros
PCPascal Chabrot
Pascal Chabrot
AKAdrian Kastler
Adrian Kastler
LOLemlih Ouchchane
Lemlih Ouchchane
LCLucie Cassagnes
Lucie Cassagnes
LBLouis Boyer
Louis Boyer

13 August 2021 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMaxime Duval
Maxime Duval
AMAudrey MIRAND
Audrey MIRAND
OLOlivier Lesens
Olivier Lesens
JBJacques-Olivier Bay
Jacques-Olivier Bay
DCDenis Caillaud
Denis Caillaud
JBJean Luc Bailly
Jean Luc Bailly
Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) has emerged as an agent of epidemic respiratory illness and acute flaccid myelitis in the paediatric population but data are lacking in adult patients. We performed a 4.5-year single-centre retrospective study of all patients who tested positive for EV-D68 and analysed full-length EV-D68 genomes of the predominant clades B3 and D1. Between 1 June 2014, and 31 December 2018, 73 of the 11,365 patients investigated for respiratory pathogens tested positive for EV-D68, of whom 20 (27%) were adults (median age 53.7 years [IQR 34.0–65.7]) and 53 (73%) were children (median age 1.9 years [IQR 0.2–4.0]). The proportion of adults increased from 12% in 2014 to 48% in 2018 (p = 0.01). All adults had an underlying comorbidity factor, including chronic lung disease in 12 (60%), diabetes mellitus in six (30%), and chronic heart disease in five (25%). Clade D1 infected a higher proportion of adults than clades B3 and B2 (p = 0.001). Clade D1 was more divergent than clade B3: 5 of 19 amino acid changes in the capsid proteins were located in putative antigenic sites. Adult patients with underlying conditions are more likely to present with severe complications associated with EV-D68, notably the emergent clade D1.

21 April 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAmandine Puissegur
Amandine Puissegur
MAMarie Accoceberry
Marie Accoceberry
MRMarion Rouzaire
Marion Rouzaire
Bruno PereiraBruno Pereira
Bruno Pereira
MHMarie Herault
Marie Herault
GDGALLOT Denis
GALLOT Denis
We conducted a retrospective case–control study in patients presenting a perineal tear (second degree or higher) or episiotomy complicated by wound breakdown during maternity stay to identify risk factors associated with wound breakdown in early postpartum with a view to improving the quality of care. We collected ante- and intrapartum characteristics and outcomes at the postpartum visit. In all, 84 cases and 249 control subjects were included. In univariate analysis, primiparity, absence of history of vaginal delivery, a longer second phase of labour, instrumental delivery, and a higher degree of laceration emerged as risk factors for early perineal suture breakdown postpartum. Gestational diabetes, peripartum fever, streptococcus B, and suture technique did not emerge as risk factors for perineal breakdown. Multivariate analysis confirmed that instrumental delivery (OR = 2.18 [1.07; 4.41], p = 0.03) and a longer second phase of labour (OR = 1.72 [1.23; 2.42], p = 0.001) were risk factors for early perineal suture breakdown.