An increase in antifungal resistant Candida strains has been reported in recent years. The aim of this study was to detect mutations in resistance genes of azole-resistant, echinocandin-resistant or multi-resistant strains using next generation sequencing technology, which allows the analysis of multiple resistance mechanisms in a high throughput setting. Forty clinical Candida isolates (16 C. albicans and 24 C. glabrata strains) with MICs for azoles and echinocandins above the clinical EUCAST breakpoint were examined. The genes ERG11, ERG3, TAC1 and GSC1 (FKS1) in C. albicans, as well as ERG11, CgPDR1, FKS1 and FKS2 in C. glabrata were sequenced. Fifty-four different missense mutations were identified, 13 of which have not been reported before. All nine echinocandin-resistant Candida isolates showed mutations in the hot spot (HS) regions of FKS1, FKS2 or GSC1. In ERG3 two homozygous premature stop codons were identified in two highly azole-resistant and moderately echinocandin-resistant C. albicans strains. Seven point mutations in ERG11 were determined in azole-resistant C. albicans whereas in azole-resistant C. glabrata, no ERG11 mutations were detected. In 10 out of 13 azole-resistant C. glabrata, 12 different potential gain-of-function mutations in the transcription factor CgPDR1 were verified, which are associated with an overexpression of the efflux pumps CDR1/2. This study showed that next generation sequencing allows the thorough investigation of a large number of isolates more cost efficient and faster than conventional Sanger sequencing. Targeting different resistance genes and a large sample size of highly resistant strains allows a better determination of the relevance of the different mutations, and to differentiate between causal mutations and polymorphisms.

Invasive infections caused by members of the genus Candida are on the rise. Especially patients in intensive care units, immunocompromised patients, and those recovering from abdominal surgery are at risk for the development of candidemia or deep-seated candidiasis. Rapid initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy can increase survival rates significantly. In the past, most of these infections were caused by C. albicans, a species that typically is very susceptible to antifungals. However, in recent years a shift towards infections caused by non-albicans species displaying various susceptibly patterns has been observed and the prompt diagnosis of the underlying species has become an essential factor determining the therapeutic outcome. The gold standard for diagnosing invasive candidiasis is blood culture, even though its sensitivity is low and the time required for species identification usually exceeds 48 h. To overcome these issues, blood culture can be combined with other methods, and a large number of tests have been developed for this purpose. The aim of this review was to give an overview on strengths and limitations of currently available molecular methods for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.

Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, demonstrates promising in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenemase-producing strains. Nonetheless, only a few reports are available regarding the acquisition of resistance in clinical settings, primarily due to its recent usage. This study aimed to investigate cefiderocol resistance using an in vitro resistance development model to gain insights into the underlying molecular resistance mechanisms. Cefiderocol susceptible reference strains (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and a clinical Acinetobacter baumannii complex isolate were exposed to increasing cefiderocol concentrations using a high-throughput resistance development model. Cefiderocol susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing was employed to identify newly acquired resistance mutations. Our in vitro resistance development model led to several clones of strains exhibiting cefiderocol resistance, with MIC values 8-fold to 512-fold higher than initial levels. In total, we found 42 different mutations in 26 genes, of which 35 could be described for the first time. Putative loss-of-function mutations were detected in the envZ, tonB, and cirA genes in 13 out of 17 isolates, leading to a decrease in cefiderocol influx. Other potential resistance mechanisms included multidrug efflux pumps (baeS, czcS, nalC), antibiotic-inactivating enzymes (ampR, dacB), and target mutations in penicillin-binding-protein genes (mrcB). This study reveals new insights into underlying molecular resistance mechanisms against cefiderocol. While mutations leading to reduced influx via iron transporters was the most frequent resistance mechanism, we also detected several other novel resistance mutations causing cefiderocol resistance.

Invasive infections caused by filamentous fungi constitute a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Rapid and reliable identification of filamentous fungi is essential for the early initiation of appropriate treatment. In the present study, 230 filamentous fungi isolates identified by conventional methods were investigated using MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) in combination with the Filamentous Fungi Library 3.0 provided by the manufacturer. Three different sample preparation methods were applied as recommended by the manufacturer and identification rates were compared using the criteria provided by the manufacturer. Application of the more time-consuming sample preparation methods clearly improved identification at the species level. Thus, the identification rate increased from 48.9% using the simplest method to 76.1% with the most laborious procedure. Misidentifications did not occur. Furthermore, the reliability of an in-house threshold for species identification was investigated. The reduced threshold increased the rate of isolates correctly identified at the species level by up to 86.4%. As no misidentification was made at the genus level and only one misidentification of minor significance occurred at the species level, this threshold could be validated for routine use in our laboratory. In conclusion, regarding the high identification rates achieved, this commercial platform proved suitable for implementation in routine diagnosis.

Purpose: Due to an increasing incidence of invasive fungal infections, the availability of reliable diagnostic tools for the fast detection of a wide spectrum of fungal pathogens is of vital importance. In this study, we aimed to conduct an extensive clinical evaluation of a recently published in-house panfungal PCR assay on samples from suspected invasive fungal infections. Methods: Overall 265 clinical samples from 232 patients with suspected invasive fungal disease (96 deep airway samples, 60 sterile fluids, 50 tissue biopsies, and 59 blood samples) were included. All samples underwent standard culture-based diagnostics and were additionally analyzed with our panfungal PCR assay. Results: Overall, 55.1% of agreement between culture and the panfungal PCR was observed; in 17% of all samples partial concordance was noted, while results between culture and our PCR assay were not in agreement in 27.9%. Our panfungal assay performed better in samples from normally sterile sites, while samples from the deep airways yielded the highest rate of discordant (39.6%) results. In two tissue and three blood samples an invasive pathogen was only detected by PCR while cultures remained negative. Conclusion: In combination with routine methods, our panfungal PCR assay is a valuable diagnostic tool. Patients at risk for invasive fungal infections might profit from the reduced time to pathogen identification.