The NETTER-1 study has proven peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to be one of the most effective therapeutic options for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), improving progression-free survival and overall survival. However, PRRT response assessment is challenging and no consensus on methods and timing has yet been reached among experts in the field. This issue is owed to the suboptimal sensitivity and specificity of clinical biomarkers, limitations of morphological response criteria in slowly growing tumors and necrotic changes after therapy, a lack of standardized parameters and timing of functional imaging and the heterogeneity of PRRT protocols in the literature. The aim of this article is to review the most relevant current approaches for PRRT efficacy prediction and response assessment criteria in order to provide an overview of suitable tools for safe and efficacious PRRT.

Aim: To evaluate the prognostic value of somatostatin receptor tumor burden (SRTB) at ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD-NETs). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT of 84 patients with histologically confirmed WD-NETs (51 G1, 30 G2 and 3 G3). For each PET/CT, all DOTATOC-avid lesions were independently segmented by 2 operators using a customized threshold based on the healthy liver maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) using LIFEx 5.1. Somatostatin receptor expressing tumor volume (SRETV) and total lesion somatostatin receptor expression (TLSRE=SRETV*SUVmean) were extracted for each lesion and then whole-body SRETV and TLSRE (SRETVwb and TLSREwb) were defined as the sum of SRETV and TLSRE of all segmented lesions in each patient, respectively. Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the combination of disease-free-survival in patients undergoing curative surgery (n = 10) and progression-free survival for patients with unresectable/metastatic disease (n = 74). TTP and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox’s proportional hazard model. Results: After a median follow-up period of 15.5 months disease progression was confirmed in 35 patients (41.7%) and 14 patients died. Higher SRETVwb (>39.1ml) and TLSREwb (>306.8g) were significantly correlated with shorter median TTP (TTP = 12months vs not reached; p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, SRETVwb (P = 0.005) was the only independent predictor of TTP regardless of histopathologic grade and TNM staging. Conclusion: According to our results, SRETVwb and TLSREwb extracted from ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT could predict TTP/OS and might have an important clinical utility in the management of in patients with WD-NETs.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to study the feasibility of an SUV-based ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT quantification and to assess the correlation of different parameters with the corresponding measured on ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WD-GEP-NET) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with WD-GEP-NET who benefited from a pretherapeutic ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and a ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT after the cycle 1 of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy were prospectively included. SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed on a system calibrated with a conversion factor of 9.48 counts/MBq per second and were reconstructed with an iterative algorithm allowing quantification using the SPECTRA Quant software (MIM Software, Cleveland, OH). For each patient, different SUV parameters were recorded on both PET/CT (Ga parameters) and SPECT/CT (Lu parameters) for comparison: physiological uptakes (liver/spleen), tumor uptake (1–10/patient; SUV_max, SUV_mean, SUV_peak, MTV), tumor-to-liver and tumor-to-spleen ratios according to liver/spleen SUV_max and SUV_mean (TLR_max, TLR_mean, TSR_max, and TSR_mean, respectively). Results: Ten patients (8 female; 2 male) aged from 50 to 83 years presenting with a metastatic progressive WD-GEP-NET (7 small intestine, 2 pancreas, 1 rectum) were included. Median values of lesional Lu-SUV were significantly lower than the corresponding Ga-SUV (P < 0.001), whereas median values of lesional Lu-MTV, Lu-TLR, and Lu-TSR were significantly higher than the corresponding Ga-MTV, Ga-TLR, and Ga-TSR (P < 0.02). Pearson correlation coefficients were strong for both SUV and MTV parameters (0.779–0.845), weak for TLR parameters (0.365–0.394), and moderate-to-strong for TSR parameters (0.676–0.750). Conclusions: Our results suggest the feasibility of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT quantification in clinical practice and show a strong correlation of several SUV-based parameters with the corresponding in ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of FDG PET-CT metabolic parameters and Deauville-like 5 point-scale to predict malignancy in a population of patients presenting focal thyroid incidentaloma (fTI). Design: This retrospective study included 41 fTI, classified according to cytological and histological data as benign (BL) or malignant lesion (ML). FDG PET-CT semi-quantitative parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV, TLG), tumor to liver SUVmean ratio (TLRmax and TLRmean), tumor to blood-pool SUVmean ratio (TBRmax and TBRmean) were calculated. Each fTI was also classified on a Deauville-like 5-point scale (DS) currently used in lymphoma. Comparison between BL and ML was performed for each parameter and a ROC analysis was conducted. Results: All quantitative PET metabolic parameters (SUV parameters, volume based parameters and SUV ratio) were higher in ML compared with BL, yet no significant difference was reported. fTI (uptake) malignancy rate according to DS grades 2, 3, 4, and 5 was, respectively, 25% (1 of 4), 28.6% (2 of 7), 8.3% (1 of 12), and 33.3% (6 of 18) with no significant difference between ML and BL groups. Results of ROC analysis showed that mean TBR had the highest AUC in our cohort (0.66 95%CI [0.41; 0.91]) with a cut-off value of 2.2. Specificity of MTV and TLG was 100% (cut-off values: MTV 9.6 ml, TLG 22.9 g) and their sensitivity was 30 and 40%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study did not highlight any FDG PET/CT parameter predictor of fTI malignancy.