Scott Senseman

Scott Senseman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2000 in Weed Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHR. L. Haney
R. L. Haney
SSScott Senseman
Scott Senseman
FHF. M. Hons
F. M. Hons
DZD. A. Zuberer
D. A. Zuberer
Effect of glyphosate on soil microbial activity and biomass - Volume 48 Issue 1 - R. L. Haney, S. A. Senseman, F. M. Hons, D. A. Zuberer

21 August 2009 in Pest Management Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SLSarah H Lancaster
Sarah H Lancaster
EHEmily B Hollister
Emily B Hollister
SSScott Senseman
Scott Senseman
TGTerry J Gentry
Terry J Gentry

1 May 2005 in Weed Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LKL. J. Krutz
L. J. Krutz
SSScott Senseman
Scott Senseman
RZR. M. Zablotowicz
R. M. Zablotowicz
MMM. A. Matocha
M. A. Matocha
Although the effectiveness of vegetative filter strips (VFS) for reducing herbicide runoff is well documented, a comprehensive review of the literature does not exist. The objectives of this article are to denote the methods developed for evaluating herbicide retention in VFS; ascertain the efficacy of VFS regarding abating herbicide runoff; identify parameters that affect herbicide retention in VFS; review the environmental fate of herbicides retained by VFS; and identify future research needs. The retention of herbicide runoff by VFS has been evaluated in natural rainfall, simulated rainfall, and simulated run-on experiments. Parameters affecting herbicide retention in VFS include width of VFS, area ratio, species established in the VFS, time after establishment of the VFS, antecedent moisture content, nominal herbicide inflow concentration, and herbicide properties. Generally, subsequent transport of herbicides retained by VFS is reduced relative to adjacent cultivated soil because of enhanced sorption and degradation in the former.

7 January 2003 in Journal of Chromatography A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LKL.J. Krutz
L.J. Krutz
SSScott Senseman
Scott Senseman
ASA.S. Sciumbato
A.S. Sciumbato

1 May 2002 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHR.L. Haney
R.L. Haney
SSScott Senseman
Scott Senseman
FHF.M. Hons
F.M. Hons

1 December 2004 in Weed Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAudie S. Sciumbato
Audie S. Sciumbato
JCJames M. Chandler
James M. Chandler
SSScott Senseman
Scott Senseman
RBRodney W. Bovey
Rodney W. Bovey
KSKen L. Smith
Ken L. Smith
Crop injury caused by drift of auxin-like herbicides has been a concern since their development. Research was conducted to describe a method of quantifying injury from auxin-like herbicides as a first step in determining crop damage. Reduced rates of 2,4-D, dicamba, and triclopyr were applied to cotton and soybean plants in the three- to six-leaf stage in field and greenhouse studies. Injury to leaves and stems were evaluated separately, and the values were combined so that one injury estimate was obtained for each individual plant rated. Injury symptoms were typical for auxin-type herbicides and ranged from slight bending of stems or petioles and wrinkled leaves to necrosis. Specific descriptions of leaf and stem injury levels were used to describe plant injury consistently. These descriptions were very detailed for the lower injury levels, but the characterizations became more general as the injury increased because of the prominence of factors such as necrosis. The injury evaluation method provided repeatable results for each herbicide and herbicide rate used. This injury evaluation method has many possible uses in auxin-like herbicide research and lays the foundation for forecasting the impact of early-season injury to cotton and soybean yield.