The number of teats in pigs is related to a sow’s ability to rear piglets to weaning age. Several studies have identified genes and genomic regions that affect teat number in swine but few common results were reported. The objective of this study was to identify genetic factors that affect teat number in pigs, evaluate the accuracy of genomic prediction, and evaluate the contribution of significant genes and genomic regions to genomic broad-sense heritability and prediction accuracy using 41,108 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from genotyping-by-sequencing on 2936 Duroc boars. Narrow-sense heritability and dominance heritability of teat number estimated by genomic restricted maximum likelihood were 0.365 ± 0.030 and 0.035 ± 0.019, respectively. The accuracy of genomic predictions, calculated as the average correlation between the genomic best linear unbiased prediction and phenotype in a tenfold validation study, was 0.437 ± 0.064 for the model with additive and dominance effects and 0.435 ± 0.064 for the model with additive effects only. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using three methods of analysis identified 85 significant SNP effects for teat number on chromosomes 1, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 14. The region between 102.9 and 106.0 Mb on chromosome 7, which was reported in several studies, had the most significant SNP effects in or near the PTGR2, FAM161B, LIN52, VRTN, FCF1, AREL1 and LRRC74A genes. This region accounted for 10.0% of the genomic additive heritability and 8.0% of the accuracy of prediction. The second most significant chromosome region not reported by previous GWAS was the region between 77.7 and 79.7 Mb on chromosome 11, where SNPs in the FGF14 gene had the most significant effect and accounted for 5.1% of the genomic additive heritability and 5.2% of the accuracy of prediction. The 85 significant SNPs accounted for 28.5 to 28.8% of the genomic additive heritability and 35.8 to 36.8% of the accuracy of prediction. The three methods used for the GWAS identified 85 significant SNPs with additive effects on teat number, including SNPs in a previously reported chromosomal region and SNPs in novel chromosomal regions. Most significant SNPs with larger estimated effects also had larger contributions to the total genomic heritability and accuracy of prediction than other SNPs.

Background: Genomic selection using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers has been widely used for genetic improvement of livestock, but most current methods of genomic selection are based on SNP models. In this study, we investigated the prediction accuracies of haplotype models based on fixed chromosome distances and gene boundaries compared to those of SNP models for genomic prediction of phenotypic values. We also examined the reasons for the successes and failures of haplotype genomic prediction. Methods: We analyzed a swine population of 3195 Duroc boars with records on eight traits: body judging score (BJS), teat number (TN), age (AGW), loin muscle area (LMA), loin muscle depth (LMD) and back fat thickness (BF) at 100 kg live weight, and average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion rate (FCR) from 30 to100 kg live weight. Ten-fold validation was used to evaluate the prediction accuracy of each SNP model and each multi-allelic haplotype model based on 488,124 autosomal SNPs from low-coverage sequencing. Haplotype blocks were defined using fixed chromosome distances or gene boundaries. Results: Compared to the best SNP model, the accuracy of predicting phenotypic values using a haplotype model was greater by 7.4% for BJS, 7.1% for AGW, 6.6% for ADG, 4.9% for FCR, 2.7% for LMA, 1.9% for LMD, 1.4% for BF, and 0.3% for TN. The use of gene-based haplotype blocks resulted in the best prediction accuracy for LMA, LMD, and TN. Compared to estimates of SNP additive heritability, estimates of haplotype epistasis heritability were strongly correlated with the increase in prediction accuracy by haplotype models. The increase in prediction accuracy was largest for BJS, AGW, ADG, and FCR, which also had the largest estimates of haplotype epistasis heritability, 24.4% for BJS, 14.3% for AGW, 14.5% for ADG, and 17.7% for FCR. SNP and haplotype heritability profiles across the genome identified several genes with large genetic contributions to phenotypes: NUDT3 for LMA, LMD and BF, VRTN for TN, COL5A2 for BJS, BSND for ADG, and CARTPT for FCR. Conclusions: Haplotype prediction models improved the accuracy for genomic prediction of phenotypes in Duroc pigs. For some traits, the best prediction accuracy was obtained with haplotypes defined using gene regions, which provides evidence that functional genomic information can improve the accuracy of haplotype genomic prediction for certain traits.

It has been proven that the random regression model has a great advantage over the repeatability model in longitudinal data analysis. At present, the random regression model has been used as a standard analysis method in longitudinal data analysis. The aim of this study was to estimate the variance components and heritability of semen traits over the reproductive lifetime of boars. The study data, including 124,941 records from 3,366 boars, were collected from seven boar AI centers in South China between 2010 and 2019. To evaluate alternative models, we compared different polynomial orders of fixed, additive, and permanent environment effects in total 216 models using Bayesian Information Criterions. The result indicated that the best model always has higher-order polynomials of permanent environment effect and lower-order polynomials of fixed effect and additive effect regression. In Landrace boars, the heritabilities ranged from 0.18 to 0.28, 0.06 to 0.43, 0.03 to 0.14, and 0.05 to 0.24 for semen volume, sperm motility, sperm concentration, and abnormal sperm percentage, respectively. In Large White boars, the heritabilities ranged from 0.20 to 0.26, 0.07 to 0.15, 0.10 to 0.23, and 0.06 to 0.34 for semen volume, sperm motility, sperm concentration, and abnormal sperm percentage, respectively.

(1) Background: Litter size traits are critical for pig breeding efficiency but pose challenges due to low heritability and sex-limited influences. This study aimed to elucidate the genetic architecture and identify candidate genes for these traits in Large White pigs using genomic selection (GS) and genome-wide association analyses (GWAS). (2) Methods: This study utilized phenotypic data from nine litter size traits in Large White sows. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) was performed to obtain genotype data, retaining 153,782 high-quality SNPs after quality control. Genetic evaluation was conducted using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP), with genetic parameters (heritability and genetic correlations) estimated via an animal model (repeatability model). To assess prediction accuracy, 10-fold cross-validation was employed to compare traditional BLUP with ssGBLUP. Furthermore, a single-step genome-wide association study (ssGWAS) integrated genomic information and pedigree-based relationship matrices to screen for significant SNPs associated with litter size traits across the genome. Functional analysis of key candidate genes was subsequently conducted based on ssGWAS results. (3) Results: Heritabilities for litter traits ranged from 0.01 to 0.06. ssGBLUP improved genomic prediction accuracy by 6.38–13.33% over BLUP. Six genomic windows explaining 1.07–1.77% of genetic variance were identified via ssGWAS, highlighting GPR12 on SSC11 as a key candidate gene linked to oocyte development. (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrates the efficacy of ssGBLUP for low-heritability traits and identifies GPR12 as a pivotal gene for litter size. Prioritizing NHB and LBWT in breeding programs could enhance genetic gains while mitigating adverse effects on piglet health. These findings advance genomic strategies for improving reproductive efficiency in swine.

(1) Background: Reproductive performance is crucial for the pork industry’s success. The Large White pig is central to this, yet the genetic factors influencing its reproductive traits are not well understood, highlighting the need for further research. (2) Methods: This study utilized Genome-Wide Association Studies to explore the genetic basis of reproductive traits in the Large White pig. We collected data from 2237 Large White sows across four breeding herds in southern China, focusing on eight reproductive traits. Statistical analyses included principal component analysis, linkage disequilibrium analysis, and univariate linear mixed models to identify significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms and candidate genes. (3) Results: Forty-five significantly related SNPs and 17 potential candidate genes associated with litter traits were identified. Individuals with the TT genotype at SNP rs341909772 showed an increase of 1.24 in the number of piglets born alive (NBA) and 1.25 in the number of healthy births (NHBs) compared with those with the CC genotype. (4) Conclusions: The SNPs and genes identified in this study offer insights into the genetics of reproductive traits in the Large White pig, potentially guiding the development of breeding strategies to improve litter size.