Natural products play a critical role in the discovery and development of numerous drugs for the treatment of various types of cancer. These phytochemicals have demonstrated anti-carcinogenic properties by interfering with the initiation, development, and progression of cancer through altering various mechanisms such as cellular proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Treating multifactorial diseases, such as cancer with agents targeting a single target, might lead to limited success and, in many cases, unsatisfactory outcomes. Various epidemiological studies have shown that the steady consumption of fruits and vegetables is intensely associated with a reduced risk of cancer. Since ancient period, plants, herbs, and other natural products have been used as healing agents. Likewise, most of the medicinal ingredients accessible today are originated from the natural resources. Regardless of achievements, developing bioactive compounds and drugs from natural products has remained challenging, in part because of the problem associated with large-scale sequestration and mechanistic understanding. With significant progress in the landscape of cancer therapy and the rising use of cutting-edge technologies, we may have come to a crossroads to review approaches to identify the potential natural products and investigate their therapeutic efficacy. In the present review, we summarize the recent developments in natural products-based cancer research and its application in generating novel systemic strategies with a focus on underlying molecular mechanisms in solid cancer.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, continues to spread globally with significantly high morbidity and mortality rates. Antigen-specific responses are of unquestionable value for clinical management of COVID-19 patients. Here, we investigated the kinetics of IgM, IgG against the spike (S) and nucleoproteins (N) proteins and their neutralizing capabilities in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with different disease presentations (i.e., mild, moderate or severe), need for intensive care units (ICU) admission or outcomes (i.e., survival vs death). We show that SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG, IgM and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) were readily detectable in almost all COVID-19 patients with various clinical presentations. Interestingly, significantly higher levels of nAbs as well as anti-S1 and -N IgG and IgM antibodies were found in patients with more severe symptoms, patients requiring admission to ICU or those with fatal outcomes. More importantly, early after symptoms onset, we found that the levels of anti-N antibodies correlated strongly with disease severity. Collectively, these findings provide new insights into the kinetics of antibody responses in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy represents a transformative breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy by harnessing the adaptive immune system to selectively eradicate cancer cells. Pioneering advances in the treatment of hematological malignancies have led to the FDA approval of several CAR-T cell therapies, particularly for patients with relapsed or refractory disease. This success is a result of continuous refinements in CAR architecture, which have evolved from early prototypes with limited therapeutic efficacy to advanced next-generation receptors that incorporate co-stimulatory domains, cytokine signaling, safety switches, and precision control mechanisms. This review elucidates the fundamental rationale behind CAR-T cell development and addresses key biological challenges encountered. Advances in receptor engineering, metabolic reprogramming, and optimized immune signaling have markedly enhanced the persistence, antitumor activity, and safety profiles of CAR-T cells. Additionally, emerging genetic engineering tools, including CRISPR, base editing, prime editing, and RNA and epigenome editing, hold promise for reducing immunogenicity and minimizing the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, CAR-T cell therapy continues to face several challenges, including severe side effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, inconsistent therapeutic responses, and high production costs. To overcome these barriers, novel approaches are under development that include generating CAR-T cells in vivo, utilizing logic-gated CAR systems, and expanding CAR platforms to include other immune effector cells, such as natural killer cells (CAR-NK) and macrophages (CAR-M). The future of CAR-based therapies is expected to integrate synthetic biology, immune checkpoint modulation, and innovative delivery methods to enhance both therapeutic efficacy and safety. This review synthesizes current knowledge and emerging strategies to guide future advancements aimed at expanding the applicability of CAR therapy to various cancer types and potentially other diseases.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the general population. Here, we aimed to evaluate and characterize the SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity rate in randomly collected samples among HCWs from the largest referral hospitals and quarantine sites during the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic in the city of Jeddah, the second largest city in Saudi Arabia, using a cross-sectional analytic study design. Out of 693 participants recruited from 29 June to 10 August 2020, 223 (32.2%, 95% CI: 28.8–35.8) were found to be confirmed seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and among those 197 (88.3%) had never been diagnosed with COVID-19. Seropositivity was not significantly associated with participants reporting COVID-19 compatible symptoms as most seropositive HCW participants 140 (62.8%) were asymptomatic. The large proportion of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases detected in our study demands periodic testing as a general hospital policy.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2, continues to spread globally with significantly high morbidity and mortality rates. Immunological surrogate markers, in particular antigen-specific responses, are of unquestionable value for clinical management of patients with COVID-19. Here, we investigated the kinetics of IgM, IgG against the spike (S) and nucleoproteins (N) proteins and their neutralizing capabilities in hospitalized patients with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 infection. Our data show that SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG, IgM and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) were readily detectable in almost all COVID-19 patients with various clinical presentations. Notably, anti-S and -N IgG, peaked 20-40 day after disease onset, and were still detectable for at least up to 70 days, with nAbs observed during the same time period. Moreover, nAbs titers were strongly correlated with IgG antibodies. Significantly higher levels of nAbs as well as anti-S1 and N IgG and IgM antibodies were found in patients with more severe clinical presentations, patients requiring admission to intensive care units (ICU) or those with fatal outcomes. Interestingly, lower levels of antibodies, particularly anti-N IgG and IgM in the first 15 days after symptoms onset, were found in survivors and those with mild clinical presentations. Collectively, these findings provide new insights into the characteristics and kinetics of antibody responses in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity.

Background: In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, various COVID-19 vaccines were administered during the pandemic. However, region-specific real-word comparative data on their immunogenicity remain limited. This study aimed to assess the serological responses to Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Moderna (mRNA-1273), and AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccines in a diverse population living in KSA. Methods: This observational study included 236 adults recruited from vaccination sites in Riyadh. Participants provided serum samples at predefined intervals: before the first dose, after the first dose, after the second dose, and post-vaccination infection (if applicable). IgG and neutralising antibodies were quantified using ELISA assays. Demographic and vaccination data, and their associations with antibody responses, were evaluated. Results: At baseline, 75.4% of participants were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG, suggesting high prior exposure. Marked incremental increases in IgG levels were observed after each vaccine dose. Both Moderna and Pfizer elicited stronger responses, with Pfizer inducing the strongest early response and Moderna achieving the highest overall titres. Among IgG-positive individuals, neutralising antibodies were detected in 98.1%. There were no statistically significant differences by age or gender, although males tended to show higher mean titres. Heterologous vaccine schedules induced comparable or enhanced immunogenicity relative to homologous schedules, supporting their use in flexible immunisation strategies. Conclusions: All COVID-19 vaccines administered in Saudi Arabia elicited robust antibody responses, particularly the mRNA-based vaccines. Our findings support their continued use and justify varied vaccination approaches, including mix-and-match booster strategies, to enhance community immunity.