Alberto Valido

Mr. Alberto Valido


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 July 2022 in School Mental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LRLuz E. Robinson
Luz E. Robinson
AVAlberto Valido
Alberto Valido
ADAnne Drescher
Anne Drescher
AWAshley B. Woolweaver
Ashley B. Woolweaver
Dorothy L. EspelageDorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage
MDMegan M. Dailey
Megan M. Dailey

6 August 2021 in School Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTCagil Torgal
Cagil Torgal
DEDorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage
JPJoshua R. Polanin
Joshua R. Polanin
KIKatherine M. Ingram
Katherine M. Ingram
LRLuz E. Robinson
Luz E. Robinson
AVAlberto Valido
Alberto Valido
Cyberbullying among youth is an emerging public health concern that has a wide array of deleterious outcomes. The current meta-analytic review synthesized school-based cyberbullying prevention programs’ impact on promoting cyber-bystander intervention among K–12 students. As a result of exhaustive searches and a thorough screening procedure, a total of 9 studies were identified as eligible. Meta-analytic synthesis of the 9 studies involving 35 effect sizes demonstrated that overall, the treatment effect was not statistically significant (g = 0.29, SE = 0.14, p = .07, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.61]). Findings of the moderator analyses suggest that incorporating an empathy activation component in the prevention program was associated with better program effectiveness in promoting cyber-bystander intervention. Further, older age was found to be associated with better program outcomes. Findings of the current meta-analysis provide important insight for developing cyberbullying prevention programs that promote cyber-bystander intervention. Supplemental data for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org/

4 May 2021 in School Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMatthew Rivas-Koehl
Matthew Rivas-Koehl
AVAlberto Valido
Alberto Valido
DEDorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage
LRLuz E. Robinson
Luz E. Robinson
JHJun Sung Hong
Jun Sung Hong
PWPeter A. Wyman
Peter A. Wyman
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) youth experience higher rates of adverse mental health outcomes, most notably suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). The current study examines risk and protective factors for STBs and depression among 1,078 youth in high schools. We examine these outcomes through an intersectional lens, and we extend the use of the minority stress theory framework by focusing on resilience and protective factors and argue that bias against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) youth should be addressed at the systemic, rather than the individual, level. Our findings suggest that family support is a notable factor protective of depression and suicide-related behavior among LGBTQ youth. Additionally, peer support, help-seeking beliefs, access to medical and counseling services, engaging in healthy activities, spirituality, and having trusted adults are protective factors for some groups. The nuanced findings in this study offer suggestions for school psychologists and professionals to promote healthy and safe school environments. Impact Statement The present study addresses the prevalence of suicide among LGBTQ adolescents and protective factors that may buffer their heightened risk. LGBTQ students are not inherently at risk because of their identities, but because of stigmatization they may face in society. As such, recommendations are provided to guide school psychologists and other professionals to foster a safe and inclusive environment for this population to reduce suicide risk.

6 March 2020 in Journal of Family Violence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AVAlberto Valido
Alberto Valido
KIKatherine Ingram
Katherine Ingram
Dorothy L. EspelageDorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage
CTCagil Torgal
Cagil Torgal
GMGabriel J. Merrin
Gabriel J. Merrin
JDJordan P. Davis
Jordan P. Davis


21 January 2021 in School Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAnjali J Forber-Pratt
Anjali J Forber-Pratt
ASAmerica J. El Sheikh
America J. El Sheikh
LRLuz E. Robinson
Luz E. Robinson
Dorothy L. EspelageDorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage
KIKatherine M. Ingram
Katherine M. Ingram
CTCagil Torgal
Cagil Torgal
School resource officers (SROs) and school security professionals (SSPs) have increased presence in schools, yet little is known about how they view the importance of their relationships with students and the broader school climate. This article is part of a larger study of an online professional development module on trauma-informed care and is focused on the qualitative reflection responses from 95 participants from three large school districts in the southeast United States. Informed by the levels of ecological systems theory, three salient themes were identified by the researchers: how SSPs and SROs describe school climate, how they respond to students with traumatic experiences, and how their perspectives may be affected by their differing roles. Findings indicate that SROs and SSPs benefited from this training on trauma-informed care because they expressed learning new strategies and feeling better equipped to serve and support students with known or unknown adverse childhood experiences. Qualitative responses from this group of engaged school security professionals and school resource officers show the importance of intentional training on how to effectively create schools that are physically and psychologically safe spaces for all students. We learned that trauma-informed approaches are often not explicitly taught to school security professionals, despite their close work with students in schools. School security professionals believe that being empowered with this knowledge has the potential to influence how they will work with students in the future. It is ethically important to train school staff to work with students in an equitable and informed manner. Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1832863.