Elena Hakme

Dr. Elena Hakme

Research Group for Analytical Food Chemistry, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2019 in Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALA. Lozano
A. Lozano
MHMarı́a Dolores Hernando
Marı́a Dolores Hernando
SUS. Uclés
S. Uclés
EHElena Hakme
Elena Hakme
AFA.R. Fernández-Alba
A.R. Fernández-Alba
There is an increasing concern about the negative impacts of veterinary drugs in beehive compartments. This study evaluates the presence and distribution of chemical residues in beeswax, bee bread and honey and determinates in what extension honeybees are exposed to them. Samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS with a wide scope of 322 chemical residues. Samples were collected from apiaries located in rural and forest areas, showing no difference in contamination of phytosanitary applications. Residues of acaricides used for sanitary treatments, coumaphos and two transformation products of amitraz (DMF and DMPF), were quantified at higher levels in wax and bee bread than in honey in most cases. Coumaphos, DMF and DMPF were detected in honey in the range 6-36 µg.kg-1; 45-541 µg.kg-1; 15-107 µg.kg-1, respectively. All, except one sample, were below the EU MRLs, 396/2005 Regulation. Other pesticide residues were detected in beeswax and bee bread at various levels.

1 September 2016 in Journal of Chromatography A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PVP. Parrilla Vázquez
P. Parrilla Vázquez
EHElena Hakme
Elena Hakme
SUS. Uclés
S. Uclés
VCV. Cutillas
V. Cutillas
MGM. Martínez Galera
M. Martínez Galera
AFAmadeo Rodriguez Fernandez-Alba
Amadeo Rodriguez Fernandez-Alba

1 March 2018 in TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EHElena Hakme
Elena Hakme
ALA. Lozano
A. Lozano
CACarmen María Ferrer Amate
Carmen María Ferrer Amate
FDFrancisco José Díaz-Galiano
Francisco José Díaz-Galiano
AFA.R. Fernández-Alba
A.R. Fernández-Alba

1 October 2018 in Journal of Chromatography A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EHElena Hakme
Elena Hakme
ALA. Lozano
A. Lozano
SUS. Uclés
S. Uclés
MRMaria Jose Gomez Ramos
Maria Jose Gomez Ramos
AFAmadeo Rodriguez Fernandez-Alba
Amadeo Rodriguez Fernandez-Alba

1 October 2017 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EHElena Hakme
Elena Hakme
ALA. Lozano
A. Lozano
MRMaria Jose Gomez Ramos
Maria Jose Gomez Ramos
MHMarı́a Dolores Hernando
Marı́a Dolores Hernando
AFAmadeo Rodriguez Fernandez-Alba
Amadeo Rodriguez Fernandez-Alba

1 August 2021 in Journal of Chromatography A
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EHElena Hakme
Elena Hakme
MPMette Erecius Poulsen
Mette Erecius Poulsen
Food analysis is a tremendously broad field that is constantly evolving. New methods have emerged to increase productivity, such as modern miniaturized and robotic analytical techniques. In this paper, a micro-solid-phase extraction system (µ-SPE) for clean-up was combined with a robotic autosampler to yield ready-to-analyze extracts. The system was evaluated for its applicability in routine laboratories. The new, automated, high-throughput µ-SPE clean-up method was applied to acetonitrile extracts and was developed for the analysis of pesticide residues in cereals by gas chromatography-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (GC-Orbitrap-MS). The µ-SPE clean-up efficiency was demonstrated in the removal of matrix-interfering components and in the recovery of pesticides. The sorbent bed mixture consisted of magnesium sulfate, primary-secondary amine, C18, and CarbonX, and effectively retained matrix components without loss of target analytes. Analysis of five types of cereals (barley, oat, rice, rye, and wheat) by GC-Orbitrap-MS showed that the method removed more than 70% of matrix components. The clean-up method was validated for 170 pesticides in rye, 159 pesticides in wheat, 142 pesticides in barley, 130 pesticides in oat, and 127 pesticides in rice. Spike recovery values were 70-120% for all pesticides and the repeatability, calculated as the relative standard deviation, was less than 20%. The limits of quantitation achieved were 0.005 mg kg-1 for almost all analytes, ensuring compliance with the maximum residue limits.