Ultra-wide-field fundus imaging (UFI) provides comprehensive visualization of crucial eye components, including the optic disk, fovea, and macula. This in-depth view facilitates doctors in accurately diagnosing diseases and recommending suitable treatments. This study investigated the application of various deep learning models for detecting eye diseases using UFI. We developed an automated system that processes and enhances a dataset of 4697 images. Our approach involves brightness and contrast enhancement, followed by applying feature extraction, data augmentation and image classification, integrated with convolutional neural networks. These networks utilize layer-wise feature extraction and transfer learning from pre-trained models to accurately represent and analyze medical images. Among the five evaluated models, including ResNet152, Vision Transformer, InceptionResNetV2, RegNet and ConVNext, ResNet152 is the most effective, achieving a testing area under the curve (AUC) score of 96.47% (with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.931–0.974). Additionally, the paper presents visualizations of the model’s predictions, including confidence scores and heatmaps that highlight the model’s focal points—particularly where lesions due to damage are evident. By streamlining the diagnosis process and providing intricate prediction details without human intervention, our system serves as a pivotal tool for ophthalmologists. This research underscores the compatibility and potential of utilizing ultra-wide-field images in conjunction with deep learning.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major complication of diabetes mellitus and is a leading cause of vision loss globally. A prompt and accurate diagnosis is crucial for ensuring favorable visual outcomes, highlighting the need for increased access to medical care. The recent remarkable advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have raised high expectations for its role in disease diagnosis and prognosis prediction across various medical fields. In addition to achieving high precision comparable to that of ophthalmologists, AI-based diagnosis of DR has the potential to improve medical accessibility, especially through telemedicine. In this review paper, we aim to examine the current role of AI in the diagnosis of DR and explore future directions.
19 January 2022 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Background/aims: To compare the performance of generative versus retrieval-based chatbots in answering patient inquiries regarding age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR).Methods: We evaluated four chatbots: generative models (ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5 and Google Bard) and a retrieval-based model (OcularBERT) in a cross-sectional study. Their response accuracy to 45 questions (15 AMD, 15 DR and 15 others) was evaluated and compared. Three masked retinal specialists graded the responses using a three-point Likert scale: either 2 (good, error-free), 1 (borderline) or 0 (poor with significant inaccuracies). The scores were aggregated, ranging from 0 to 6. Based on majority consensus among the graders, the responses were also classified as ‘Good’, ‘Borderline’ or ‘Poor’ quality.Results: Overall, ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 outperformed the other chatbots, both achieving median scores (IQR) of 6 (1), compared with 4.5 (2) in Google Bard, and 2 (1) in OcularBERT (all p ≤8.4×10−3). Based on the consensus approach, 83.3% of ChatGPT-4’s responses and 86.7% of ChatGPT-3.5’s were rated as ‘Good’, surpassing Google Bard (50%) and OcularBERT (10%) (all p ≤1.4×10−2). ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 had no ‘Poor’ rated responses. Google Bard produced 6.7% Poor responses, and OcularBERT produced 20%. Across question types, ChatGPT-4 outperformed Google Bard only for AMD, and ChatGPT-3.5 outperformed Google Bard for DR and others.Conclusion: ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 demonstrated superior performance, followed by Google Bard and OcularBERT. Generative chatbots are potentially capable of answering domain-specific questions outside their original training. Further validation studies are still required prior to real-world implementation.
Problem: Low-quality fundus images with complex degredation can cause costly re-examinations of patients or inaccurate clinical diagnosis.Aim: This study aims to create an automatic fundus macular image enhancement framework to improve low-quality fundus images and remove complex image degradation.Method: We propose a new deep learning-based model that automatically enhances low-quality retinal fundus images that suffer from complex degradation. We collected a dataset, comprising 1068 pairs of high-quality (HQ) and low-quality (LQ) fundus images from the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital’s health screening program and ophthalmology department from 2017 to 2019. Then, we used these dataset to develop data augmentation methods to simulate major aspects of retinal image degradation and to propose a customized convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture to enhance LQ images, depending on the nature of the degradation. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index measure (SSIM),r-value (linear index of fuzziness), and proportion of ungradable fundus photographs before and after the enhancement process are calculated to assess the performance of proposed model. A comparative evaluation is conducted on an external database and four different open-source databases.Results: The results of the evaluation on the external test dataset showed an significant increase in PSNR and SSIM compared with the original LQ images. Moreover, PSNR and SSIM increased by over 4dBand 0.04, respectively compared with the previous state-of-the-art methods (P< 0.05). The proportion of ungradable fundus photographs decreased from 42.6% to 26.4% (P= 0.012).Conclusion: Our enhancement process improves LQ fundus images that suffer from complex degradation significantly. Moreover our customized CNN achieved improved performance over the existing state-of-the-art methods. Overall, our framework can have a clinical impact on reducing re-examinations and improving the accuracy of diagnosis.
1 January 2021 in American Journal of Ophthalmology