Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the association of pharmacokinetic variability and pharmacogenomics with the bioequivalence of orally administered gefitinib (Iressa^®, AstraZeneca) provided by three sponsors in healthy subjects. Methods: The study designs were randomized, open-label, and two-period crossover studies in both fasting and fed healthy subjects. In one fasting study, the sample size was enlarged from 30 to 60 for the failing study. Each study subject received a 250-mg gefitinib tablet with a 21-day washout. The plasma concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods. Genetic analyses of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP2D6 alleles were carried out by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: Two hundred and sixty healthy male subjects were enrolled. The median maximum plasma concentration (T_max) was 4–5 h, and the mean elimination half-life (t_1/2) was 18–26 h. The maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the curve (AUC) increased but T_max and t_1/2 were unaffected by the intake of high-fat food. Three fed and two fasting studies achieved a plausible bioequivalence. The intake of high-fat food decreased the intra-subject variability significantly. In addition, CYP2D6 was associated with gefitinib exposure and may contribute to the high inter-subject variability, but it did not influence the bioequivalence result. Conclusions: Gefitinib is well tolerated, and the bioequivalence is easier to achieve under fed conditions compared to fasting conditions. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of geometric mean ratio (GMR) can be narrowed when the sample size is enlarged without changing the formulation-related technology.

Background: Jaktinib is a novel selective janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor. The phase I first-in-human study evaluated the tolerance and pharmacokinetics of jaktinib in healthy Chinese subjects.Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study were designed. A total of 126 healthy subjects were enrolled into the single ascending dose, multiple ascending dose and food effect study. Safety endpoints included adverse events, abnormal vital signs, 12-lead ECGs, abdominal ultrasound, chest x-ray, physical examination and clinical laboratory tests. Blood, urine and feces samples were collected at predetermined time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of jaktinib, the metabolites ZG0244 and ZG0245, which are formed by oxidation or hydrolysis metabolic pathway, respectively.Results: Jaktinib was absorbed with a median time to peak plasma concentration of 1.25–3.5 h and was eliminated with a half-life of 2.952–9.040 h. Linear pharmacokinetic characteristic was presented over the dose range from 25 to 400 mg. No obvious accumulation was observed after multiple doses for 10 days. Administration after a high-fat breakfast significantly increased the absorption of jaktinib. The accumulated fraction of jaktinib and the determined metabolites excreted in urine and feces was 19.478%. Jaktinib was well tolerated in all single dose cohorts. In multiple dose cohorts, 200 mg q24 h method was evaluated as maximally tolerated dose. Neutropenia, diarrhea, dizziness and headache were the most frequently reported treatment related adverse events. No deaths, serious or Grade ≥4 adverse events was developed.Conclusion: Jaktinib was well tolerated when single dose ranging from 25 to 400 mg and multiple dose up to 200 mg q24 h. The safety and pharmacokinetic characteristics support the next trial in myelofibrosis patients.

HDV infection causes severe liver disease, the global health burden of which may be underestimated due to limited epidemiological data. HDV depends on HBV for infection, but recent studies indicated that dissemination can also be supported by other helper viruses such as HCV. We used a rapid point-of-care test and an ELISA to retrospectively test for antibodies against the Hepatitis Delta antigen (anti-HDV-Ab) in 4103 HBsAg-positive and 1661 HBsAg-negative, anti-HCV-positive sera from China and Germany. We found that the HDV seroprevalence in HBsAg-positive patients in China is limited to geographic hotspots (Inner Mongolia: 35/251, 13.9%; Xinjiang: 7/180, 3.9%) and high-risk intravenous drug users (HBV mono-infected: 23/247, 9.3%; HBV-HCV co-infected: 34/107, 31.8%), while none of the 2634 HBsAg carriers from other metropolitan regions were anti-HDV-Ab-positive. In Germany, we recorded an HDV seroprevalence of 5.3% in a university hospital environment. In a cohort of HBsAg-negative, anti-HCV-positive patients that were not exposed to HBV before (anti-HBc-negative), HDV was not associated with HCV mono-infection (Chinese high-risk cohort: 0/365, 0.0%; German mixed cohort: 0/263, 0.0%). However, 21/1033 (2.0%) high-risk HCV patients in China with markers of a previously cleared HBV infection (anti-HBc-positive) were positive for anti-HDV-Ab, with two of them being positive for both HDV and HCV RNA but negative for HBV DNA. The absence of anti-HDV-Ab in HCV mono-infected patients shows that HCV cannot promote HDV transmission in humans.