Over the last decade, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms have significantly evolved and been employed in diverse applications, such as computer vision, natural language processing, automated speech recognition, etc. Real-time safety-critical embedded and Internet of Things (IoT) systems, such as autonomous driving systems, UAVs, drones, security robots, etc., heavily rely on ML/DL-based technologies, accelerated with the improvement of hardware technologies. The cost of a deadline (required time constraint) missed by ML/DL algorithms would be catastrophic in these safety-critical systems. However, ML/DL algorithm-based applications have more concerns about accuracy than strict time requirements. Accordingly, researchers from the real-time systems (RTSs) community address the strict timing requirements of ML/DL technologies to include in RTSs. This article will rigorously explore the state-of-the-art results emphasizing the strengths and weaknesses in ML/DL-based scheduling techniques, accuracy versus execution time tradeoff policies of ML algorithms, and security and privacy of learning-based algorithms in real-time IoT systems.

To understand human behaviors, action recognition based on videos is a common approach. Compared with image-based action recognition, videos provide much more information, reducing the ambiguity of actions. In the last decade, many works focus on datasets, novel models and learning approaches have improved video action recognition to a higher level. However, there are challenges and unsolved problems, in particular in sports analytics where data collection and labeling are more sophisticated, requiring people with domain knowledge and even sport professionals to annotate data. In addition, the actions could be extremely fast and it becomes difficult to recognize them. Moreover, in team sports like football and basketball, one action could involve multiple players, and to correctly recognize them, we need to analyze all players, which is relatively complicated. In this paper, we present a survey on video action recognition for sports analytics. We introduce more than ten types of sports, including team sports, such as football, basketball, volleyball, hockey and individual sports, such as figure skating, gymnastics, table tennis, tennis, diving and badminton. Then we compare numerous existing frameworks for sports analysis to present status quo of video action recognition in both team sports and individual sports. Finally, we discuss the challenges and unsolved problems in this area and to facilitate sports analytics, we develop a toolbox using PaddlePaddle, which supports football, basketball, table tennis and figure skating action recognition.