Gelya Frank

Dr. Gelya Frank


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

49Years (1978-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 1999 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLeslie J Blackhall
Leslie J Blackhall
GFGelya Frank
Gelya Frank
SMSheila T Murphy
Sheila T Murphy
VMVicki Michel
Vicki Michel
JPJoycelynne M Palmer
Joycelynne M Palmer
SAStanley P Azen
Stanley P Azen

1 April 1991 in American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FCFlorence A. Clark
Florence A. Clark
DPDiane Parham
Diane Parham
MCMichael E. Carlson
Michael E. Carlson
GFGelya Frank
Gelya Frank
JJJeanne Jackson
Jeanne Jackson
RZRuth Zemke
Ruth Zemke
Occupational science is a new scientific discipline that is defined as the systematic study of the human as an occupational being. A doctoral program in occupational science has been established at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, With its emphasis on the provision of a multidimensional description of the substrates, form, function, meaning, and sociocultural and historical contexts of occupation, occupational science emphasizes the ability of humans throughout the life span to actively pursue and orchestrate occupations. In this paper, occupational science is described, defined, and distinguished from other social sciences. A general systems model is presented as a heuristic to explain occupation and organize knowledge in occupational science. The development of occupational science offers several key benefits to the profession of occupational therapy, including (a) fulfillment of the demand for doctoral-level faculty members in colleges and universities; (b) the generation of needed basic science research; and (c) the justification for and potential enhancement of practice.

1 January 1996 in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSheila T. Murphy
Sheila T. Murphy
JPJoycelynne M. Palmer
Joycelynne M. Palmer
SAStanley Azen
Stanley Azen
GFGelya Frank
Gelya Frank
VMVicki Michel
Vicki Michel
SKStanley Ken
Stanley Ken

1 March 1978 in Anthropology and Humanism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LLL.L. Langnes
L.L. Langnes
GFGelya Frank
Gelya Frank

1 December 1998 in Medical Anthropology Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GFGelya Frank
Gelya Frank
LBLeslie J. Blackhall
Leslie J. Blackhall
VMVicki Michel
Vicki Michel
SMSheila T. Murphy
Sheila T. Murphy
SAStanley P. Azen
Stanley P. Azen
KPKyeyoung Park
Kyeyoung Park

1 March 2001 in Journal of Urban Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLeslie J. Blackhall
Leslie J. Blackhall
GFGelya Frank
Gelya Frank
SMSheila Murphy
Sheila Murphy
VMVicki Michel
Vicki Michel
After a survey of 800 seniors from four different ethnic groups showed that Korean-American and Mexican-American subjects were much less likely than their European-American and African-American counterparts to believe that a patient should be told the truth about the diagnosis and prognosis of a terminal illness, we undertook an ethnographic study to look more deeply at attitudes and experiences of these respondents. European-American and African-American respondents were more likely to view truth-telling as empowering, enabling the patient to make choices, while the Korean-American and Mexican-American respondents were more likely to see the truth-telling as cruel, and even harmful, to the patients. Further differences were noted in how the truth should be told and even in definitions of what constitutes “truth” and “telling”. Clinical and bioethics professionals should be aware of how their cultural and economic backgrounds influence the way they perceive ethical dilemmas and remember to make room for the diverse views of the populations they serve.