Hypoxia, a common factor ruling the microenvironment composition, leads to tumor progression. In this hypoxic context, cytokines and cells cooperate to favor cancer development and metastasis. Tumor hypoxia is heterogeneously distributed. Oxygen gradients depend on the vicinity, functionality of blood vessels, and oxygen ability to diffuse into surrounding tissues. Thus, the vasculature state modulates the microenvironment of the tumor cells. Cells sense and react to small variations in oxygen tension, which explains the lack of tumor cells’ unicity in their reaction to drugs. Ovarian cancers are highly hypoxia-dependent, ascites worsening the access to oxygen, in their reactions to both chemotherapy and new immunotherapy. Consequently, hypoxia affects the results of immunotherapy, and is thus, crucial for the design of treatments. Controlling key immunosuppressive factors and receptors, as well as immune checkpoint molecule expression on tumor, immune and stromal cells, hypoxia induces immunosuppression. Consequently, new approaches to alleviate hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment bring promises for ovarian cancer immunotherapeutic strategies. This review focuses on the effects of hypoxia in the microenvironment and its consequences on tumor treatments. This opens the way to innovative combined treatments to the advantage of immunotherapy outcome in ovarian cancers.

Cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) are defined as cancer cells with stem cell characteristics. Although CSLCs constitute no more than a few percent of the tumor mass, they play important roles in cancer chemo-resistance, metastasis and disease recurrence. Ovarian cancer (OC) is considered the most...

The aim of this study was to search for predictive and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with everolimus among the components of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. In a prospective, one-arm, phase II study, patients with mRCC received everolimus (10 mg/day) using a 30-day cycle. A prospectively planned evaluation of potential biomarkers of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. The median age of the 58 patients enrolled into the study was 60 years (range 41–78 years). In multivariate analysis, it was found that the adverse independent predictors for everolimus therapy were histological grade G1/2 {hazard ratio (HR): 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29–5.58, P = 0.0082]}, increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level before treatment [HR: 2.55 (95% CI 1.30–4.99, P = 0.0064)] and the PIK3CA gene variant rs6443624 (HR: AC + AA versus CC = 2.08, 95% CI 1 11–3.89, P = 0.0254). In multivariate analysis, it was observed that the adverse independent prognostic factors were: elevated corrected calcium level [HR: 4.17 (95% CI 1.66–10.51; P = 0.0024)] and the PIK3CA gene variant rs6443624 [HR: AC + AA versus CC = 1.97 (95% CI 1.02–3.79; P = 0.0421)]. The PI3KCA gene polymorphism, LDH, and histologic grade can predict the effects of everolimus treatment. The corrected calcium level and the PIK3CA gene variant rs6443624 may be independent prognostic factors. Further investigation is needed to confirm and validate these findings prospectively in other RCC trials.

Aims: To evaluate the potential role of serum cystatin C as a marker of renal function in patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: Treatment of consecutive ovarian cancer patients who were eligible for chemotherapy with paclitaxel (135 mg/m2/24 h) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) every 3 weeks in 6 cycles. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) markers, i.e. serum levels of creatinine and cystatin C, estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulas, were recorded before each cycle and 3 weeks after the 6th course. Results: The median age of 34 patients was 54 years. In the initial stage of treatment, we did not observe any correlation between cystatin C and other GFR markers. We noted a significant association between cystatin C and tumor extent on spiral CT scans (diameter: >1 cm) performed at baseline (p = 0.004), and after the 1st (p = 0.03) and 2nd cycle (p = 0.026). We observed a correlation between cystatin C and CA-125 level before chemotherapy (R = 0.4; p = 0.02) and after the 1st cycle (R = 0.43; p = 0.04). Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that cystatin C is not a reliable marker of the GFR in ovarian cancer patients, probably due to its nature as a cysteine protease inhibitor.