Alexander Louie

Dr. Alexander Louie

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2022 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WRW. Kimryn Rathmell
W. Kimryn Rathmell
RRR. Bryan Rumble
R. Bryan Rumble
Peter VeldhuizenPeter Veldhuizen
Peter Veldhuizen
HAHikmat A. Al-Ahmadie
Hikmat A. Al-Ahmadie
HEHamid Emamekhoo
Hamid Emamekhoo
ESEric A. Singer
Eric A. Singer
PURPOSE: To provide recommendations for the management of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).METHODS: An Expert Panel conducted a systematic literature review to obtain evidence to guide treatment recommendations.RESULTS: The panel considered peer-reviewed reports published in English.RECOMMENDATIONS: The diagnosis of metastatic ccRCC should be made using tissue biopsy of the primary tumor or a metastatic site with the inclusion of markers and/or stains to support the diagnosis. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk criteria should be used to inform treatment. Cytoreductive nephrectomy may be offered to select patients with kidney-in-place and favorable- or intermediate-risk disease. For those who have already had a nephrectomy, an initial period of active surveillance may be offered if they are asymptomatic with a low burden of disease. Patients with favorable-risk disease who need systemic therapy may be offered an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in combination with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); patients with intermediate or poor risk should be offered a doublet regimen (no recommendation was provided between ICIs or an ICI in combination with a VEGFR TKI). For select patients, monotherapy with either an ICI or a VEGFR TKI may be offered on the basis of comorbidities. Interleukin-2 remains an option, although selection criteria could not be identified. Recommendations are also provided for second- and subsequent-line therapy as well as the treatment of bone metastases, brain metastases, or the presence of sarcomatoid features. Participation in clinical trials is highly encouraged for patients with metastatic ccRCC. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines

19 August 2019 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDavid Palma
David Palma
Robert Anton OlsonRobert Anton Olson
Robert Anton Olson
SHStephen Harrow
Stephen Harrow
RCRohann J. M. Correa
Rohann J. M. Correa
FSFamke Schneiders
Famke Schneiders
SSSuresh Senan
Suresh Senan
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as a new treatment option for patients with oligometastatic disease. SABR delivers precise, high-dose, hypofractionated radiotherapy, and achieves excellent rates of local control for primary tumors or metastases. A recent randomized phase II trial evaluated SABR in a group of patients with a small burden of oligometastatic disease (mostly with 1–3 metastatic lesions), and found that SABR was associated with benefits in progression-free survival and overall survival. The goal of this phase III trial is to assess the impact of SABR in patients with 4–10 metastatic cancer lesions. One hundred and fifty-nine patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between the control arm (consisting of standard of care palliative-intent treatments), and the SABR arm (consisting of standard of care treatment + SABR to all sites of known disease). Randomization will be stratified by two factors: histology (Group 1: prostate, breast, or renal; Group 2: all others), and type of pre-specified systemic therapy (Group 1: immunotherapy/targeted; Group 2: cytotoxic; Group 3: observation). SABR is to be completed within 2 weeks, allowing for rapid initiation of systemic therapy. Recommended SABR doses are 20 Gy in 1 fraction, 30 Gy in 3 fractions, or 35 Gy in 5 fractions, chosen to minimize risks of toxicity. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, time to development of new metastatic lesions, quality of life, and toxicity. Translational endpoints include assessment of circulating tumor cells, cell-free DNA, and tumor tissue as prognostic and predictive markers, including assessment of immunological predictors of response and long-term survival. This study will provide an assessment of the impact of SABR on clinical outcomes and quality of life, to determine if long-term survival can be achieved for selected patients with 4–10 oligometastatic lesions. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03721341 . Date of registration: October 26, 2018.

1 July 2017 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HCHanbo Chen
Hanbo Chen
SSSuresh Senan
Suresh Senan
ENEsther J. Nossent
Esther J. Nossent
RBR. Gabriel Boldt
R. Gabriel Boldt
AWAndrew Warner
Andrew Warner
ALAlexander Louie
Alexander Louie

1 May 2018 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HCHanbo Chen
Hanbo Chen
JLJoanna M. Laba
Joanna M. Laba
GBGabriel Boldt
Gabriel Boldt
CGChristopher D. Goodman
Christopher D. Goodman
DPDavid A. Palma
David A. Palma
ALAlexander Louie
Alexander Louie

1 August 2019 in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HCHanbo Chen
Hanbo Chen
JLJoanna M. Laba
Joanna M. Laba
SZSondos Zayed
Sondos Zayed
RBR. Gabriel Boldt
R. Gabriel Boldt
DPDavid A. Palma
David A. Palma
ALAlexander Louie
Alexander Louie

1 October 2015 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlexander Louie
Alexander Louie
EWErik Van Werkhoven
Erik Van Werkhoven
HCHanbo Chen
Hanbo Chen
ESEgbert F. Smit
Egbert F. Smit
MPMarinus A. Paul
Marinus A. Paul
SSSuresh Senan
Suresh Senan