Solid tumors can be divided into benign solid tumors and solid malignant tumors in the academic community, among which malignant solid tumors are called cancers. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world, and the global incidence of cancer is increasing yearly New cancer patients in China are always the first. After the concept of stem cells was introduced in the tumor community, the CSC markers represented by ALDH1 have been widely studied due to their strong CSC cell characteristics and potential to be the driving force of tumor metastasis. In the research results in the past five years, it has been found that ALDH1 is highly expressed in various solid cancers such as breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, gastric cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal cancer, ovarian cancer, head,and neck cancer. ALDH1 can activate and transform various pathways (such as the USP28/MYC signaling pathway, ALDH1A1/HIF-1α/VEGF axis, wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway), as well as change the intracellular pH value to promote formation and maintenance, resulting in drug resistance in tumors. By targeting and inhibiting ALDH1 in tumor stem cells, it can enhance the sensitivity of drugs and inhibit the proliferation, differentiation, and metastasis of solid tumor stem cells to some extent. This review discusses the relationship and pathway of ALDH1 with various solid tumors. It proposes that ALDH1 may serve as a diagnosis and therapeutic target for CSC, providing new insights and new strategies for reliable tumor treatment.

Primary small cell esophageal carcinoma is a rare and aggressive type of gastrointestinal cancer with poor prognosis. In the present study, the impact of tumour infiltrating inflammatory cells on clinico-pathological characteristics and the patients’ prognosis were analysed. A total of 36 small cell esophageal carcinomas, 19 adjacent normal tissues and 16 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma samples were collected. Qualified pathologists examined eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes and macrophages on histochemical slides. The infiltration of eosinophils and macrophages in small cell esophageal carcinoma was significantly increased as compared with tumor adjacent normal tissues, and was significantly less in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Macrophage count was significantly associated with (p = 0.015) lymph node—stage in small cell esophageal carcinoma. When we grouped patients into two groups by counts of infiltrated inflammatory cells, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that high macrophage infiltration group (p = 0.004) and high eosinophil infiltration group (p = 0.027) had significantly enhanced survival. In addition, multivariate analysis unveiled that eosinophil count (p = 0.002) and chemotherapy (Yes vs. No, p = 0.001) were independent prognostic indicators. Taken together, infiltration of macrophages and eosinophils into the solid tumor appear to be important in the progression of small cell esophageal carcinoma and patients’ prognosis.

Background: Proline-, glutamic acid-, and leucine-rich protein 1 (PELP1), a co-activator of estrogen receptors alpha, was confirmed to be directly associated with the oncogenic process of multiple cancers, especially hormone-dependent cancers. The purpose of our research was to explore the biological function, clinical significance, and therapeutic targeted value of PELP1 in gastric cancer (GC). Methods: The expression status of PELP1 in GC cell lines or tissues was analyzed through bioinformatics data mining. Thirty-six GC tissue chip was applied to demonstrate the results of bioinformatics data mining assayed by immunohistochemical method. The expression status of PELP1 in GC cell lines was also analyzed using western blot. Correlation analysis between PELP1 expression and clinicopathological parameter was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to analyze the relationship between PELP1 expression and total survival time. Three pairs of siRNA were designed to silence the expression of PELP1 in GC. After PELP1 was silenced by siRNA or activated by saRNA, the growth, plate colony formation, migration and invasion ability of the GC cell or normal gastric epithelium cell line was tested in vitro. Cell cycle was tested by flow cytometry. Nude mice xenograft experiment was performed after PELP1 was silenced. The downstream molecular pathway regulated by PELP1 was explored. Molecular docking tool was applied to combine chlorpromazine with PELP1. The inhibitory effect of chlorpromazine in GC was assayed, then it was tested whether PELP1 was a therapeutic target of chlorpromazine in GC. Results: PELP1 expression was elevated in GC cell lines and clinical GC tissue samples. PELP1 silence by siRNA compromised the malignant traits of GC. PELP1 expression positively correlated with tumor invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, tissue grade, TNM stage, but had no correlation with patient age, sex, tumor size, and tumor numbers. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed high PELP1 expression had a shorter survival period in GC patients after follow-up. Q-PCR and western blot revealed PELP1 suppression in GC decreased expression of the c-Src-PI3K-ERK pathway. It was also implied that chlorpromazine (CPZ) can inhibit the malignant traits of GC and downregulate the expression of PELP1. Conclusions: In a word, PELP1 is an oncogene in gastric cancer and c-Src-PI3K-ERK pathway activation may be responsible for its tumorigenesis, PELP1 may be a potential therapeutic target of chlorpromazine in GC.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are hypothesized to govern the origin, progression, drug resistance, recurrence and metastasis of human cancer. CSCs have been identified in nearly all types of human cancer, including esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). Four major methods are typically used to isolate or enrich CSCs, including: i) fluorescence‑activated cell sorting or magnetic‑activated cell sorting using cell‑specific surface markers; ii) stem cell markers, including aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A1; iii) side population cell phenotype markers; and iv) microsphere culture methods. ESCC stem cells have been identified using a number of these methods. An increasing number of stem cell signatures and pathways have been identified, which have assisted in the clarification of molecular mechanisms that regulate the stemness of ESCC stem cells. Certain viruses, such as human papillomavirus and hepatitis B virus, are also considered to be important in the formation of CSCs, and there is a crosstalk between stemness and viruses‑associated genes/pathways, which may suggest a potential therapeutic strategy for the eradication of CSCs. In the present review, findings are summarized along these lines of inquiry.