Jeongho Kim

Jeongho Kim


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in The World Journal of Men's Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JKJeongho Kim
Jeongho Kim
KLKisoo Lee
Kisoo Lee
TKTae Hyo Kim
Tae Hyo Kim
This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of prostatic urethral lift in Korean patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Thirty-two men with symptomatic BPH were consecutively treated in a tertiary care center in Korea. To be included in the present analysis, patients had to meet the following criteria: age ≥50 years, International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) >12, and prostate volume between 30 mL and 80 mL. Patients were evaluated up to a median follow-up period of 1 year post-procedure. The primary outcomes included symptom relief, improvement of quality of life (QOL), and preservation of sexual function. All procedures were finished with a mean of 2.2 implants without any serious complication. The numbers of patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and ischemic heart disease were 16 (50.0%), 24 (75.0%), and 9 (28.1%), respectively. Patients experienced symptom relief by 1 week that was sustained for 12 months. The mean IPSS, QOL, and maximum flow rate improved to 43%, 70%, and 25% by 1 week, and to 41%, 60%, and 32% by 12 months (p<0.001), respectively. There were no occurrences of early urge incontinence, retrograde ejaculation, or erectile dysfunction. Patient-reported adverse events were mild and transient. Prostatic urethral lift is a safe and effective treatment for BPH in the Asian population. This treatment is minimally invasive, can be performed under local anesthesia, and may be an appropriate method for fragile patients.

1 July 2021 in Asian Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TKTae Nam Kim
Tae Nam Kim
JKJeongho Kim
Jeongho Kim
COCheol Kyu Oh
Cheol Kyu Oh
WLWan Lee
Wan Lee
JNJong Kil Nam
Jong Kil Nam
KLKi Soo Lee
Ki Soo Lee
Background: Excellent success rates with short-term outcomes are noted for laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction (LUR) for iatrogenic ureteral injury. This multi-institutional study assessed the medium-term (>1 year) outcomes and compared three surgical techniques of LUR. Methods: Patients who underwent LUR at five tertiary hospitals between January 2007 and June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with active abdominopelvic inflammatory disease, history of urothelial cancer, and tumor recurrence and those who received adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded. Results: The success rates of LUR for 61 patients at 3 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up (at least 12 months postoperatively) were 100% and 95.1%, respectively. No significant difference was noted in the success rates of the three types of LUR. LUR was mainly performed in response to the demands of the primary surgeon responsible for the iatrogenic injury (33 of 45 cases, 73.3%). The vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) incidence was higher in the refluxing laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy (LUN) group (40%) than in the anti-refluxing LUN group (15%, odds ratio: 1.5, p = 0.252). None of the patients in the LUN groups received treatment for VUR during the follow-up. The laparoscopic end-to-end ureteroureterostomy (LEEU) group had shorter operative time (p < 0.001) and lesser intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001) than the LUN groups. Conclusion: LUR is safe and feasible, with good medium-term outcomes. LEEU is a good surgical option in terms of the operative and subsequent outcomes. The anti-reflux technique in LUR reduces de-novo VUR development but is not necessary for preventing upper urinary tract infections in adults. (C) 2021 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

13 October 2015 in Canadian Urological Association Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJeongho Kim
Jeongho Kim
SSSeong Il Seo
Seong Il Seo
CSCheryn Song
Cheryn Song
JCJinsoo Chung
Jinsoo Chung
CKCheol Kwak
Cheol Kwak
SHSung-Hoo Hong
Sung-Hoo Hong
In this retrospective multicentre study, we compared the clinicohistological characteristics of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between pediatric and adult patients. Data for patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for RCC between 1988 and 2014 at multiple institutions were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to age at diagnosis: pediatric patients (age ≤18 years) and adult patients (age ≥40 years). The groups were compared for clinical and pathologic variables, and survival analysis was performed. The median follow-up period was 64 (range: 30-91) months for pediatric patients versus 44 (range: 19-59) months for adult patients (p = 0.026). Pediatric patients were mostly female (p = 0.003), had symptoms at presentation (p < 0.001), and had a high-stage tumour (p = 0.014) than adult patients. Among the symptomatic patients, gross hematuria was the most common symptom. The median tumour size was not different between groups. Regarding histologic types, pediatric patients had more papillary tumours (p < 0.001), more unclassified tumours (p < 0.001), and fewer clear cell carcinomas (p < 0.001). Five-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85% and 87.4% in pediatric and adult patients, respectively (log rank p = 0.901). Recurrence-free survival was better in adult patients, although this did not reach statistical significance (log rank p = 0.272). This study has several limitations, including its retrospective nature and the relatively small number of pediatric RCC cases. RCC in children is rare and is characterized by features that differ from those in adult RCC. Prognosis did not differ between groups.

14 July 2016 in Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJeongho Kim
Jeongho Kim
YPYong Hyun Park
Yong Hyun Park
YKYong June Kim
Yong June Kim
SKSeok Ho Kang
Seok Ho Kang
SBSeok-Soo Byun
Seok-Soo Byun
SHSung-Hoo Hong
Sung-Hoo Hong
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of age at diagnosis on tumor characteristics and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and methods: Data of patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for renal tumor between 2003 and 2011 at multiple institutions were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to age at diagnosis: 20–39 years and 40–79 years. To adjust for potential baseline confounders, propensity score matching was performed. Results: All included data showed that young RCC patients presented with renal tumors that had a more favorable histological subtype, were localized, smaller in size, and had a lower Fuhrman nuclear grade. The 5 year CSS rates were 95.5% and 90.5% in the young and old patient groups, respectively (log rank p = 0.019). After matching on the propensity score, the two groups with RCC had 302 patients each. Because the groups were matched on covariates, there were no significant differences in the pathological proportion, tumor size, Fuhrman nuclear grade and clinical T stage. The 5 year CSS rates were 95.5% and 94.7% in the young and old patient groups, respectively (log rank p = 0.184). Conclusion: After adjusting for potential biases, there was no significant difference in prognosis between young and old patients with RCC.

23 November 2017 in Canadian Urological Association Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJeongho Kim
Jeongho Kim
Wan LeeWan Lee
Wan Lee
TKTae Nam Kim
Tae Nam Kim
JNJong Kil Nam
Jong Kil Nam
TKTae Hyo Kim
Tae Hyo Kim
KLKisoo Lee
Kisoo Lee
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world clinical outcomes of first-line pazopanib and second-line everolimus in Korean patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).Methods: Data of patients who had mRCC with clear-cell component between 2001 and 2015 at multiple institutions were collected retrospectively. To be included in the analysis, patients had to meet the following criteria: age ≥18 years; received first-line targeted therapy with pazopanib; and received second-line targeted therapy with everolimus. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs).Result: A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis. The median followup period was 33.5 months (range 17‒49.5). The median PFS was eight months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4‒9.6) after treatment with pazopanib and three months (95% CI 1.9‒4.1) with everolimus. The median OS was 27 months (95% CI 16.6‒37.4). The median treatment duration was seven months (range 4.3‒10.8) after treatment with pazopanib and 3.5 months (range 3‒4) with everolimus. Multivariate analysis revealed that the Heng risk criteria were independently associated with OS (p<0.001). Almost every patient experienced some form of AE, the majority of which were mostly mild or moderate in severity. The most common AEs were diarrhea (50%), hypertension (44.4%), and fatigue (41.7%) after treatment with pazopanib, and anemia (47.2%), stomatitis (41.7%), and fatigue (38.9%) with everolimus.Conclusions: The outcomes for the patients treated with pazopanib followed by everolimus in Korea as observed by us were consistent with those reported by previous studies. The Heng risk criteria were significantly associated with the prognosis of patients with mRCC. AEs were mainly mild to moderate and readily managed.