The primary aim of this study was to compare the frequency of overweight and obesity in Spanish children and teenagers by using national and international standards for the body mass index (BMI). The second aim was to establish the association between criteria based on BMI and body composition. The third aim was to propose new standards of fat percentages in order to increase diagnostic accuracy in patients with excess weight. The sample was composed of 7,228 boys and girls aged between 6 and 20 years. Anthropometric measurements were taken (height, weight and subcutaneous skinfolds), and BMI and the percentage of fat were obtained using the methods of Durnin and Womersley, Siri and Slaughter et al. To classify obesity and overweight, the national standards of Hernández et al and the international standards published by Cole et al were used. The correlation between BMI and percentage of fat was established using Spearman's method and the variability fat percentage was estimated in relation to the BMI cut-off points proposed by the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF). Overweight and obesity were more frequent in boys than in girls and in the youngest individuals. According to national standards, between 9.6 % (6-12 years) and 9.5 % (13-20 years) of girls and between 10.62 % (13-20 years) and 12.50 % (6-12 years) of boys were overweight. According to international standards, between 4.68 % (13-20 years) and 6 % (6-12 years) of boys were obese and between 18.83 % (13-20 years) and 21.6 % (6-12 years) were overweight. The proportion of obesity in girls ranged from 2.81 % (13-20 years) to 5.9 % (6-12 years); the prevalence of overweight was 25.99 % in the group aged 6-12 years and was 14.55 % in that aged 13-20 years. The analysis carried out shows that the association between BMI and adiposity differs in normal individuals and in those with excess weight. The international standards of Cole et al tend to underestimate obesity and to overestimate overweight. Therefore, their usefulness is limited to comparative studies and their use cannot be recommended in clinical diagnosis, where it would be more effective to use of specific population standards, especially those for fat percentage.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychological distress of Spanish airline pilots, a group of professionals undergoing an unprecedented work situation as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. To do so, we administered the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). A total of 342 questionnaires were obtained, with the largest respondent age group being 41–50 years. The psychometric properties of the instrument were also evaluated, with an exploratory factor analysis revealing a unidimensional structure that explained 59.23% of the variance. The total score on the standard GHQ-12 was 4.54 ± 3.31 very close to the cut-off point established to determine psychological distress. The score increased among those unemployed and was also higher among pilots on furlough compared to those whose work situation was relatively normal. Furthermore, the reliability measured by the total Cronbach's alpha was above 0.8 of each across all employment status considered. These results show the desirability of conducting periodic psychological distress assessments of pilots so that effective measures can be implemented to ensure their psychological and socio-emotional well-being. Practitioner summary: This article evaluates psychological distress in a group of professionals that has received scant attention in the field. Moreover, it does so against the background of an atypical situation, evaluating the psychological distress suffered by pilots in different employment categories during the current severe crisis in the aviation sector. Abbreviations: CFI: comparative fit index; COPAC: Official College of Commercial Aviation Pilots; ECA: European Cockpit Association; EFA: exploratory factor analysis; GHQ-12: general health questionnaire-12; IATA: International Air Transport Association; KMO: Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test; PA: optimal implementation of parallel analysis; ULS: unweighted least squares

Commercial aviation pilots are an occupational group that work in particular conditions, with frequent schedule changes, shift work, unfavorable environmental conditions, etc. These circumstances can lead to fatigue, work overload (WO), and daytime sleepiness, factors that can affect their health and safety. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and the association between these parameters in a sample of Spanish commercial airline pilots. The Raw TLX, Fatigue Severity Scale, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaires were administered in a sample of 283 participants. The relationships of the total scores between all the questionnaires were studied by the chi-square test and the risk scores (odds ratio) were calculated. Different models using multiple linear regression were carried out to evaluate the effects of WO, fatigue, and daytime sleepiness, among the total scores, age, and flight hours. Additionally, the internal consistency of each questionnaire was estimated. A total of 28.2% presented WO above the 75th percentile, with mental and temporal demand the dimensions with the greatest weight. A total of 18% of pilots presented fatigue, 15.8% moderate sleepiness, and 3.9% severe sleepiness. We observed an association among WO, fatigue, and daytime sleepiness, important factors related to pilot health and aviation safety.