Presently, deep learning models are an alternative solution for predicting solar energy because of their accuracy. The present study reviews deep learning models for handling time-series data to predict solar irradiance and photovoltaic (PV) power. We selected three standalone models and one hybrid model for the discussion, namely, recurrent neural network (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and convolutional neural network-LSTM (CNN–LSTM). The selected models were compared based on the accuracy, input data, forecasting horizon, type of season and weather, and training time. The performance analysis shows that these models have their strengths and limitations in different conditions. Generally, for standalone models, LSTM shows the best performance regarding the root-mean-square error evaluation metric (RMSE). On the other hand, the hybrid model (CNN–LSTM) outperforms the three standalone models, although it requires longer training data time. The most significant finding is that the deep learning models of interest are more suitable for predicting solar irradiance and PV power than other conventional machine learning models. Additionally, we recommend using the relative RMSE as the representative evaluation metric to facilitate accuracy comparison between studies.

The application of solar energy as a renewable energy source has significantly escalated owing to its abundance and availability worldwide. However, the intermittent behavior of solar irradiance is a serious disadvantage for electricity grids using photovoltaic (PV) systems. Thus, reliable solar irradiance data are vital to achieve consistent energy production. Geostationary satellite images have become a solution to this issue, as they represent a database for solar irradiance on a massive spatiotemporal scale. The estimation of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) using satellite images has been developed based on physical and semi-empirical models, but only a few studies have been dedicated to modeling GHI using semi-empirical models in Korea. Therefore, this study conducted a comparative analysis to determine the most suitable semi-empirical model of GHI in Korea. Considering their applicability, the Beyer, Rigollier, Hammer, and Perez, models were selected to estimate the GHI over Seoul, Korea. After a comparative evaluation, the Hammer model was determined to be the best model. This study also introduced a hybrid model and applied a long short-term memory (LSTM) model in order to improve prediction accuracy. The hybrid model exhibited a smaller root-mean-square error (RMSE), 97.08 W/m², than that of the Hammer model, 103.92 W/m², while producing a comparable mean-bias error. Meanwhile, the LSTM model showed the potential to further reduce the RMSE by 11.2%, compared to the hybrid model.

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper