Since 2001, South Korea has experienced sustained lowest-low fertility. This phenomenon has persisted despite the implementation of several social policies aimed at increasing fertility rates. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the demographics, socioeconomics, housing situation, residential environment, and housing expectation of newlyweds in terms of their fertility intentions in South Korea (within 5 years of marriage) in order to help the development of more effective housing policies. We extracted the factors on the basis of fertility theories and previous related studies and identified differential characteristics of the impact on fertility intentions for the first and for additional child(ren). The results show that fertility intention was higher in non-metropolitan and rental households. There was also a significant relationship between the anticipated period of a home purchase and fertility intention. In particular, for one-child families, the second child fertility intention was significantly affected. In conclusion, we quantitatively confirmed various factors that significantly impact the fertility plans of newlyweds. We suggest that the government implements housing policies on the basis of economic stability, the number of children, and the residential environment of newlywed couples.

This study explored typologies among residents of South Korean public rental housing, focusing on their experiences of discrimination and social capital. Latent class analysis (LCA) was applied to data from 4683 individuals in the 2021 Seoul Public Rental Housing Panel Survey. Four distinct groups were identified: ‘Group Seeking Friendly Neighbor Relationships’, ‘Group Accepting Losses’, ‘Group with High Social Capital’, and ‘Group Indifferent to Neighbors’. The findings revealed that while discrimination was widespread, certain groups exhibited strong social capital. Notably, the ‘Group Accepting Losses’ showed the highest willingness to help neighbors despite facing significant discrimination, while the ‘Group with High Social Capital’ displayed high levels of neighbor trust and mutual support. These results challenge traditional views by showing that social capital can thrive even in the presence of discrimination. This study suggests that policies aimed at addressing discrimination in public rental housing should focus not only on physical integration but also on fostering social connections to enhance community cohesion and reduce mental health issues among residents.

This study examines the relationships among social capital, residential satisfaction, and attitudes toward disadvantaged groups in South Korea, with a focus on the moderating effects of educational and employment vulnerability. Using data from the 2022 Seoul Survey, which included a sample of 39,340 individuals, the analysis employed Hayes’ Process Macro to assess both mediation and moderated mediation effects. The findings show that social capital significantly enhances residential satisfaction (β = 0.557, p < 0.001), which, in turn, positively influences attitudes toward disadvantaged groups (β = 0.411, p < 0.001). Notably, the impact of residential satisfaction on attitudes was stronger for individuals who were educationally and employment-vulnerable, underscoring the amplified role of housing conditions in shaping social attitudes for these groups. These results highlight the importance of strengthening social capital and implementing targeted housing policies to improve the well-being of vulnerable populations. Policy recommendations include integrating social capital-building initiatives with urban planning strategies and addressing the specific needs of vulnerable groups through tailored housing interventions to foster social cohesion and inclusivity. Future research should explore other dimensions of vulnerability and utilize longitudinal data to assess long-term impacts.

Study examines the relationships among social capital, residential satisfaction, and attitudes to-ward disadvantaged groups in South Korea, with a focus on the moderating effects of educational and employment vulnerability. Using data from the 2022 Seoul Survey, which included a sample of 39,340 individuals, the analysis employed Hayes’ Process Macro to assess both mediation and moderated mediation effects. The results indicate that social capital significantly enhances resi-dential satisfaction, which in turn positively influences attitudes toward disadvantaged groups. Notably, the effects of residential satisfaction on attitudes were stronger for individuals who were educationally and employment-vulnerable, highlighting the amplified role of housing conditions in shaping social attitudes for these groups. These findings underscore the importance of en-hancing social capital and implementing targeted housing policies for vulnerable populations. Policy recommendations include integrating social capital-building initiatives with urban plan-ning strategies and addressing the specific needs of vulnerable groups through tailored housing interventions to foster social cohesion and inclusivity. Future research should explore other di-mensions of vulnerability and utilize longitudinal data to assess long-term impacts.

We investigated the determinants of awareness, utilization, and satisfaction regarding financial aid programs for single-person households in South Korea and proposed policy enhancements. Our analysis employed logistic regression on microdata from the “2020 Housing Survey” by Statistics Korea, covering the nation and all age groups. We categorized single-person household traits affecting program awareness, utilization, and satisfaction into demographic, socio-economic, housing, and housing perception factors. The dependent variables included awareness, utilization status, and satisfaction levels of government-sponsored financial support programs, which were measured on a four-point Likert scale. The independent variables encompassed demographic, socio-economic, and housing characteristics, which were analyzed comprehensively. We identified factors that influenced awareness, utilization, and satisfaction and recommended tailored policy measures. The findings revealed lower awareness among elderly individuals, women, rural residents, and rental households. Moreover, older age, lower income, rental, and one-room dwelling households exhibited lower utilization rates, with decreased housing and residential environment satisfaction correlating with diminished program satisfaction. Due to the diverse characteristics of single-person households, strategic interventions are crucial. Measures to bridge information gaps, establish comprehensive long-term support systems, and develop differentiated policies tailored to single-person household traits are imperative for improving financial aid programs for this demographic.

This study aims to explore and classify typologies among residents of public rental housing in South Korea by examining their experiences of discrimination and social capital. Social capital refers to the network of relationships, trust, and social cohesion that facilitates collective action and mutual support within a community. Discrimination experiences encompass the unfair treatment individuals face based on various characteristics, leading to social exclusion and reduced oppor-tunities. The analysis, based on data from the 2021 Seoul Public Rental Housing Panel Survey involving 4,683 individuals, utilized latent class analysis (LCA), chi-square tests, and one-way ANOVAs to identify distinct group characteristics. Four typologies emerged from the analysis: 'Group Seeking Friendly Neighbor Relationships', 'Group Accepting Losses', 'Group with High Social Capital', and 'Group Indifferent to Neighbors'. Each group demonstrated unique residential characteristics, perceptions of social integration, and resident activities, with significant differ-ences observed in mental health outcomes. Notably, the study revealed unconventional insights that challenge existing academic discussions, such as the identification of groups with a strong inclination to support neighbors despite experiencing discrimination, and a group expressing a clear desire for neighborly interaction. The findings suggest that to effectively address discrim-ination in public rental housing, policies should incorporate comprehensive approaches that consider social, economic, and cultural elements alongside physical integration. These policy recommendations aim to foster inclusivity and reduce conflict within public rental communities. Furthermore, these insights could be valuable for other countries seeking to develop or improve public rental housing policies. By integrating social capital-building initiatives and addressing discrimination comprehensively, these strategies can contribute to enhancing community cohe-sion and reducing social tensions on a global scale.