Carl Andreas Grøntvedt

Dr. Carl Andreas Grøntvedt


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 August 2016 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CGCarl Andreas Grøntvedt
Carl Andreas Grøntvedt
PEPetter Elstrøm
Petter Elstrøm
MSMarc Stegger
Marc Stegger
RSRobert Leo Skov
Robert Leo Skov
PAPaal Skytt Andersen
Paal Skytt Andersen
JBJørgen Vildershøj Bjørnholt
Jørgen Vildershøj Bjørnholt
Emerging livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) persist in livestock populations and represent a reservoir for transmission to humans. Understanding the routes of introduction and further transmission is crucial to control this threat to human health. All reported cases of livestock-associated MRSA (CC398) in humans and pigs in Norway between 2008 and 2014 were included. Data were collected during an extensive outbreak investigation, including contact tracing and stringent surveillance. Whole-genome sequencing of isolates from all human cases and pig farms was performed to support and expand the epidemiological findings. The national strategy furthermore included a “search-and-destroy” policy at the pig farm level. Three outbreak clusters were identified, including 26 pig farms, 2 slaughterhouses, and 36 humans. Primary introductions likely occurred by human transmission to 3 sow farms with secondary transmission to other pig farms, mainly through animal trade and to a lesser extent via humans or livestock trucks. All MRSA CC398 isolated from humans without an epidemiological link to the outbreaks were genetically distinct from isolates within the outbreak clusters indicating limited dissemination to the general population. This study identified preventable routes of MRSA CC398 introduction and transmission: human occupational exposure, trade of pigs and livestock transport vehicles. These findings are essential for keeping pig populations MRSA free and, from a “One Health” perspective, preventing pig farms from becoming reservoirs for MRSA transmission to humans.

4 December 2014 in BMC Veterinary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jwee Chiek ErJwee Chiek Er
Jwee Chiek Er
BLBjørn Lium
Bjørn Lium
STSaraya Tavornpanich
Saraya Tavornpanich
PHPeer Ola Hofmo
Peer Ola Hofmo
HFHilde Forberg
Hilde Forberg
EBEdgar Brun
Edgar Brun
Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection in Norwegian pigs was largely subclinical. This study tested the hypothesis that the infection causes negligible impact on pigs’ growth performance in terms of feed conversion efficiency, daily feed intake, daily growth, age on reaching 100 kg bodyweight and overall feed intake. A sample of 1955 pigs originating from 43 breeding herds was classified into five infection status groups; seronegative pigs (n = 887); seropositive pigs (n = 874); pigs positive for virus at bodyweight between 33 kg and 60 kg (n = 123); pigs positive for virus at bodyweight between 61 kg and 80 kg (n = 34) and pigs positive for virus at bodyweight between 81 kg and 100 kg (n = 37). Each pig had daily recordings of feed intake and bodyweight from 33 kg to 100 kg. Marginal effects of the virus infection on the outcomes were estimated by multi-level linear regression, which accounted for known fixed effects (breed, birthdate, average daily feed intake and growth phase) and random effects (cluster effects of pig and herd). The seropositive and virus positive pigs had decreased (P value<0.05) growth performance compared to seronegative pigs even though feed intake was not decreased. Reduced feed conversion efficiency led to lower average daily growth, additional feed requirement and longer time needed to reach the 100 kg bodyweight. The effects were more marked (P value<0.03) in pigs infected at a younger age and lasted a longer period. Despite increased feed intake observed, their growth rates were lower and they took more time to reach 100 kg bodyweight compared to the seronegative pigs. Our study rejected the null hypothesis that the virus infection had negligible adverse effects on growth performance of Norwegian pigs.

24 June 2020 in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLiza Miriam Cohen
Liza Miriam Cohen
CGCarl Andreas Grøntvedt
Carl Andreas Grøntvedt
TKThea B. Klem
Thea B. Klem
SGStine Margrethe Gulliksen
Stine Margrethe Gulliksen
BRBirgit Ranheim
Birgit Ranheim
CKCamilla Kielland
Camilla Kielland
Background: Respiratory diseases are major health concerns in the pig production sector worldwide, contributing adversely to morbidity and mortality. Over the past years there was a rise in reported incidents of respiratory disease in pigs in Norway, despite population wide freedom from Aujeszky´s disease, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, porcine respiratory corona virus and enzootic pneumonia. The main objective of this study was to investigate acute outbreaks of respiratory disease in conventional Norwegian fattening pig herds. The study included 14 herds. In seven herds with reported outbreaks of acute respiratory disease, data on clinical signs was recorded and samples for laboratory examination were collected. Diagnostic protocols were compared by parallel analysis of clinically healthy pigs from seven non-outbreak herds.Results: The most commonly reported clinical signs were sudden deaths and dyspnea. An average compartment morbidity of 60%, mortality of 4% and case fatality of 9% was recorded in the outbreak herds. Post-mortem examinations revealed acute lesions resembling porcine pleuropneumonia in all 28 pigs investigated from the outbreak herds and in 2 of the 24 (8%) pigs from the non-outbreak herds. Chronic lesions were recorded in another 2 pigs (8%) from the non-outbreak herds.Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeserovar 8 was isolated from lungs and/or pleura from all tested pigs (n = 28) in the outbreak herds, and from 2 out of 24 pigs (8%) in the non-outbreak herds, one pig with an acute and another pig with a chronic infection. No other significant bacterial findings were made. Seroconversion toA. pleuropneumoniaeantibodies was detectable in all outbreak herds analyzed and in six out of seven non-outbreak herds, but the risk ratio for seroconversion of individual pigs was higher (risk ratio 2.3 [1.50- 3.43 95% CI; P < 0.001]) in the outbreak herds. All herds tested positive for porcine circovirus type 2 and negative for influenza A viruses on oral fluid RT-qPCR.Conclusion: The main etiological pathogen found during acute outbreaks of respiratory disease wasA. pleuropneumoniaeserovar 8. All pigs from outbreak herds had typical lesions of acute porcine pleuropneumonia, and onlyA. pleuropneumoniaeserovar 8 was identified. Co-infections were not found to impact disease development.

15 December 2020 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHåkon Kaspersen
Håkon Kaspersen
AUAnne Margrete Urdahl
Anne Margrete Urdahl
CGCarl Andreas Grøntvedt
Carl Andreas Grøntvedt
SGStine Margrethe Gulliksen
Stine Margrethe Gulliksen
BTBereket Tesfamichael
Bereket Tesfamichael
CSCamilla Sekse
Camilla Sekse
Norway has a favourable situation with regard to health status and antimicrobial usage in the pig production sector. However, one of the major disease-causing agents in the commercial pig population is Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP). In some herds, APP eradication has been performed by using enrofloxacin in combination with a partial herd depopulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of a single treatment event with enrofloxacin on the occurrence of quinolone resistant Escherichia coli (QREC). The study was designed as a retrospective case/control study, where the herds were selected based on treatment history. Faecal samples were taken from sows, gilts, fattening pigs and weaners for all herds where available. A semi-quantitative culturing method was used to identify the relative quantity of QREC in the faecal samples. A significant difference in overall occurrence and relative quantity of QREC was identified between the case and control herds, as well as between each animal age group within the case/control groups. The results indicate that a single treatment event with enrofloxacin significantly increased the occurrence of QREC in the herd, even years after treatment and with no subsequent exposure to quinolones.