Scott Goodrick

Dr. Scott Goodrick

Center for Forest Disturbance Science, USDA Forest Service, Athens, GA 30602, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 2018 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlan Srock
Alan Srock
JCJoseph Charney
Joseph Charney
BPBrian Potter
Brian Potter
SGScott Goodrick
Scott Goodrick
Fire weather indices are commonly used by fire weather forecasters to predict when weather conditions will make a wildland fire difficult to manage. Complex interactions at multiple scales between fire, fuels, topography, and weather make these predictions extremely difficult. We define a new fire weather index called the Hot-Dry-Windy Index (HDW). HDW uses the basic science of how the atmosphere can affect a fire to define the meteorological variables that can be predicted at synoptic-and meso-alpha-scales that govern the potential for the atmosphere to affect a fire. The new index is formulated to account for meteorological conditions both at the Earth’s surface and in a 500-m layer just above the surface. HDW is defined and then compared with the Haines Index (HI) for four historical fires. The Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) is used to provide the meteorological data for calculating the indices. Our results indicate that HDW can identify days on which synoptic-and meso-alpha-scale weather processes can contribute to especially dangerous fire behavior. HDW is shown to perform better than the HI for each of the four historical fires. Additionally, since HDW is based on the meteorological variables that govern the potential for the atmosphere to affect a fire, it is possible to speculate on why HDW would be more or less effective based on the conditions that prevail in a given fire case. The HI, in contrast, does not have a physical basis, which makes speculation on why it works or does not work difficult because the mechanisms are not clear.

31 August 2012 in International Journal of Wildland Fire
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGScott Goodrick
Scott Goodrick
GAGary L. Achtemeier
Gary L. Achtemeier
NLNarasimhan K. Larkin
Narasimhan K. Larkin
YLYongqiang Liu
Yongqiang Liu
TSTara M. Strand
Tara M. Strand
Among the key issues in smoke management is predicting the magnitude and location of smoke effects. These vary in severity from hazardous (acute health conditions and drastic visibility impairment to transportation) to nuisance (regional haze), and occur across a range of scales (local to continental). Over the years a variety of tools have been developed to aid in predicting smoke effects. This review follows the development of these tools, from various indices and simple screening models to complex air quality modelling systems, with a focus on how each tool represents key processes involved in smoke transport.

1 January 2011
Verified
Report
Open access
PDF file
PWPaul A. Werth
Paul A. Werth
BPBrian Potter
Brian Potter
CCCraig Clements
Craig Clements
MFMark A. Finney
Mark A. Finney
SGScott Goodrick
Scott Goodrick
SMSara S. McAllister
Sara S. McAllister

1 January 2016
Verified
Report
Closed access
PDF file
PWPaul A. Werth
Paul A. Werth
BPBrian Potter
Brian Potter
MAMartin E. Alexander
Martin E. Alexander
CCCraig Clements
Craig Clements
MCMiguel G. Cruz
Miguel G. Cruz
RPRussell A. Parsons
Russell A. Parsons

19 August 2011 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GAGary Achtemeier
Gary Achtemeier
SGScott Goodrick
Scott Goodrick
YLYongqiang Liu
Yongqiang Liu
FMFernando Garcia Menendez
Fernando Garcia Menendez
YHYongtao Hu
Yongtao Hu
MOMehmet Talat Odman
Mehmet Talat Odman
We present Daysmoke, an empirical-statistical plume rise and dispersion model for simulating smoke from prescribed burns. Prescribed fires are characterized by complex plume structure including multiple-core updrafts which makes modeling with simple plume models difficult. Daysmoke accounts for plume structure in a three-dimensional veering/sheering atmospheric environment, multiple-core updrafts, and detrainment of particulate matter. The number of empirical coefficients appearing in the model theory is reduced through a sensitivity analysis with the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST). Daysmoke simulations for “bent-over” plumes compare closely with Briggs theory although the two-thirds law is not explicit in Daysmoke. However, the solutions for the “highly-tilted” plume characterized by weak buoyancy, low initial vertical velocity, and large initial plume diameter depart considerably from Briggs theory. Results from a study of weak plumes from prescribed burns at Fort Benning GA showed simulated ground-level PM2.5 comparing favorably with observations taken within the first eight kilometers of eleven prescribed burns. Daysmoke placed plume tops near the lower end of the range of observed plume tops for six prescribed burns. Daysmoke provides the levels and amounts of smoke injected into regional scale air quality models. Results from CMAQ with and without an adaptive grid are presented.

12 November 2002 in International Journal of Wildland Fire
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGScott Goodrick
Scott Goodrick
The Fosberg fire weather index is a simple tool for evaluating the potential influence of weather on a wildland fire based on temperature, relative humidity and wind speed. A modification to this index that includes the impact of precipitation is proposed. The Keetch-Byram drought index is used to formulate a ‘fuel availability’ factor that modifies the response of the fire weather index. Comparisons between the original and modified indices are made using historical fire data from the Florida Division of Forestry. The addition of the fuel availability factor helps increase the utility of the fire weather index as it offers an improved relationship between the index and area burned.