Nadine KAFA

Prof. Nadine KAFA

KEDGE Business School
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMinke Wang
Minke Wang
JWJiang Wu
Jiang Wu
Nadine KAFANadine KAFA
Nadine KAFA
WKWalid Klibi
Walid Klibi

1 September 2013 in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nadine KAFANadine KAFA
Nadine KAFA
YHYasmina HANI
Yasmina HANI
AMAbderhamane El MHAMEDI
Abderhamane El MHAMEDI

1 January 2016 in IFAC-PapersOnLine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMA. El Mokrini
A. El Mokrini
Nadine KAFANadine KAFA
Nadine KAFA
EDE. Dafaoui
E. Dafaoui
AMA. El Mhamedi
A. El Mhamedi
ABA. Berrado
A. Berrado

19 March 2021 in British Food Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nadine KAFANadine KAFA
Nadine KAFA
Anicia JaeglerAnicia Jaegler
Anicia Jaegler
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to systematically review and critically examine food losses and waste quantification in supply chain, especially in studies that tackle all the supply chain activities in a real context.Design/methodology/approach: This work employed a systematic literature review methodology on the extant literature focusing on peer-reviewed journal articles published from 2000 to 2019.Findings: A systematic analysis of 117 articles reveals that downstream supply chains are studied to a greater extent than upstream supply chains, with an emphasis on consumer waste. The findings also highlight more than half of the articles focus on only one supply chain activity. In terms of the methodologies, surveys and modelling methods are the most used to measure food losses and wastes, adopt monetary, carbon emission and calorific metrics. This study highlights that while food losses and waste research remains a relevant field of study, it has yet to been fully explored.Research limitations/implications: The main limit is the adoption of a systematic review method for food losses and waste quantification in supply chain.Practical implications: The results suggest that supply chain managers should invest in acquiring more knowledge about food losses in the global network. Upstream supply chains should be more studied and integrated with the downstream supply chains. Using combined direct and indirect methods has the potential to deal with the contradictions of quantification, the lack of data and reduce losses over time and space.Originality/value: Based on this review as the first one focusing exclusively on quantification of food losses and waste in supply chain context, the authors develop an aspiring research agenda that proposes opportunities for future research.Headings We analyse 117 studies addressing food losses and waste quantification. Downstream food supply chains are more studied than upstream food supply chains. Case studies of food supply chains in developed countries are more prolific. The main metric to quantify food losses and waste is weight.

1 January 2015 in IFAC-PapersOnLine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nadine KAFANadine KAFA
Nadine KAFA
YHYasmina Hani
Yasmina Hani
AMAbederrahman El Mhamedi
Abederrahman El Mhamedi

3 November 2017 in OPSEARCH
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nadine KAFANadine KAFA
Nadine KAFA
YHYasmina HANI
Yasmina HANI
AMAbederrahman El Mhamedi
Abederrahman El Mhamedi