Haijun Wang

Dr. Haijun Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 February 2022 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CNChuansheng Nie
Chuansheng Nie
YYYoufan Ye
Youfan Ye
JWJingnan Wu
Jingnan Wu
HZHongyang Zhao
Hongyang Zhao
XJXiaobing Jiang
Xiaobing Jiang
HWHaijun Wang
Haijun Wang
Objective: Craniopharyngioma has always been a challenge for the neurosurgeon, and there is no consensus on optimal treatment. The objective of this study was to compare surgical outcomes and complications between transcranial surgery (TCS) and endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) of craniopharyngiomas. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent craniopharyngioma resection at Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2010 and December 2019 was performed. A total of 273 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients were analyzed with surgical effects, endocrinologic outcomes, complications, and follow-up results. Results: A total of 185 patients underwent TCS and 88 underwent EES. There were no significant differences in patient demographic data, preoperative symptoms, and tumor characteristics between the two groups. The mean follow-up was 30.5 months (range 8–51 months). The EES group had a greater gross total resection (GTR) rate (89.8% EES vs. 77.3% TCS, p < 0.05) and lower rate of hypopituitarism (53.4% EES vs. 68.1% TCS, p < 0.05) and diabetes insipidus (DI) (51.1% EES vs. 72.4% TCS, p < 0.05). More postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks occurred in the EES group (4.5% EES vs. 0% TCS, p < 0.05). More patients in the EES group with preoperative visual deficits experienced improvement after surgery (74.5% EES vs. 56.3% TCS, p < 0.05). There were statistical differences in the recurrence rates (12.5% EES vs. 23.8% TCS, p < 0.05) between the 2 groups. Conclusion: These data support the view that EES is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery compared to TCS. Compared to TCS, EES has fewer surgical complications and a lower recurrence rate.

1 March 2021 in Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJiabin Zhou
Jiabin Zhou
FZFengqi Zhang
Fengqi Zhang
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen
SZShilin Zhang
Shilin Zhang
HWHaijun Wang
Haijun Wang
Introduction: Chlorogenic acid (CGA) is a type of polyphenolic substance that is widely extracted from many traditional Chinese medicines (eg, Lonicera japonica Thunb, Eucommia ulmoides Oliver) and exhibits a wide range of anti-tumor effects. However, the potential molecular mechanisms of CGA in glioma U373 cells remain unclear. Methods: Network pharmacology analysis was used to explore the potential therapeutic targets of CGA in glioma. Human glioma U373 cells were treated with different concentrations of CGA for 24 h. CCK-8 assays were used to detect the inhibitory rate of cell growth. Annexin V-FITC/PI staining and Hoechst 33342 staining were used to detect apoptosis. PI staining was used to investigate cell-cycle progression. Wound healing assays and transwell assays were used to detect the cell migration and invasion, respectively. Western blotting and immunohistochemistry were used to measure protein levels in vitro and in vivo. Results: The proliferation of U373 cells was significantly inhibited by CGA in a dose- and time-dependent manner. CGA significantly arrested the cell cycle of U373 cells in the G2/M phase and induced apoptosis. Moreover, CGA significantly suppressed the migration and invasion of U373 cells. Additionally, we found that CGA inhibited the growth of U373 cells in vivo. Furthermore, network pharmacology analysis suggested that the anti-tumor effects of CGA on U373 cells were associated with the down-regulation of the SRC/MAPKs signaling pathway. Discussion: The present study indicated that CGA had anti-glioma effects on U373 cells by down-regulating SRC/MAPKs signal pathway.

31 August 2022 in Frontiers in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KQKang Qian
Kang Qian
CNChuansheng Nie
Chuansheng Nie
WZWende Zhu
Wende Zhu
HZHongyang Zhao
Hongyang Zhao
FZFangcheng Zhang
Fangcheng Zhang
XJXiaobing Jiang
Xiaobing Jiang
Background: Tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM), a common benign tumor in the sellae region, usually causes neurological deficits, such as vision impairment, by squeezing the peripheral neurovascular structures. Surgical management is recommended as the optimal strategy for TSM treatment and vision restoration. However, it remains challenging to resect TSM in the traditional transcranial approach (TCA). Recently, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has emerged as an effective option in skull base surgeries. Besides the effectivity, the advantages and limitations of EEA in TSM surgery remain controversial.Object: We compared the surgical outcomes and complications between TCA and EEA surgeries to identify the principles in TSM surgical management.Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on the patients, who underwent TSM surgery in Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were assigned to TCA or EEA group according to the surgery they experienced. All patients were analyzed with the extent of tumor resection, vision outcome, postoperative complications, and follow-up results.Results: A total of 112 patients were enrolled in this study, including 78 in TCA group and 34 in EEA group. The mean follow-up was 20.5 months (range 3–36 months). There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographic data, preoperative symptoms, and tumor characteristics between TCA and EEA groups. Both TCA and EEA surgeries are effective in TSM resection with relatively high gross total resection rates (85.9% in TCA vs. 91.2% in EEA, p > .05). Meanwhile, EEA surgery has a better outcome in vision restoration or stabilization than TCA surgery (74.6% in TCA vs. 93.1% in EEA, p < .05). Whereas EEA surgery causes more occurrences of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage than TCA surgery (0% in TCA vs. 11.8% in EEA, p < .05).Conclusion: Both TCA and EEA surgeries are effective in TSM resection. EEA surgery has a better outcome in vision restoration or stabilization than TCA surgery, but induces higher risk of CSF leakage. As each approach has unique advantages and limitations, we must take all aspects into consideration, including approach feathers, tumor characteristics, and clinical requirements, to make the optimal choice in TSM surgical management.

11 September 2025 in Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XYXiao-Xiao Yu
Xiao-Xiao Yu
DXDa Xu
Da Xu
SCShuang Chen
Shuang Chen
QLQiang Liu
Qiang Liu
HWHaijun Wang
Haijun Wang
MLMan Li
Man Li