Tae-Ho Lee

Dr. Tae-Ho Lee


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2016 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMichiko Sakaki
Michiko Sakaki
HYHyun Joo Yoo
Hyun Joo Yoo
LNLin Nga
Lin Nga
TLTae-Ho Lee
Tae-Ho Lee
JTJulian F. Thayer
Julian F. Thayer
MMMara Mather
Mara Mather

1 January 2016 in Neurobiology of Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDavid V. Clewett
David V. Clewett
TLTae-Ho Lee
Tae-Ho Lee
SGSteven Greening
Steven Greening
APAllison Ponzio
Allison Ponzio
EMEshed Margalit
Eshed Margalit
MMMara Mather
Mara Mather

4 January 2018 in The Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDavid V. Clewett
David V. Clewett
RHRingo Huang
Ringo Huang
RVRico Velasco
Rico Velasco
TLTae-Ho Lee
Tae-Ho Lee
MMMara Mather
Mara Mather
Recent models posit that bursts of locus ceruleus (LC) activity amplify neural gain such that limited attention and encoding resources focus even more on prioritized mental representations under arousal. Here, we tested this hypothesis in human males and females using fMRI, neuromelanin MRI, and pupil dilation, a biomarker of arousal and LC activity. During scanning, participants performed a monetary incentive encoding task in which threat of punishment motivated them to prioritize encoding of scene images over superimposed objects. Threat of punishment elicited arousal and selectively enhanced memory for goal-relevant scenes. Furthermore, trial-level pupil dilations predicted better scene memory under threat, but were not related to object memory outcomes. fMRI analyses revealed that greater threat-evoked pupil dilations were positively associated with greater scene encoding activity in LC and parahippocampal cortex, a region specialized to process scene information. Across participants, this pattern of LC engagement for goal-relevant encoding was correlated with neuromelanin signal intensity, providing the first evidence that LC structure relates to its activation pattern during cognitive processing. Threat also reduced dynamic functional connectivity between high-priority (parahippocampal place area) and lower-priority (lateral occipital cortex) category-selective visual cortex in ways that predicted increased memory selectivity. Together, these findings support the idea that, under arousal, LC activity selectively strengthens prioritized memory representations by modulating local and functional network-level patterns of information processing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTAdaptive behavior relies on the ability to select and store important information amid distraction. Prioritizing encoding of task-relevant inputs is especially critical in threatening or arousing situations, when forming these memories is essential for avoiding danger in the future. However, little is known about the arousal mechanisms that support such memory selectivity. Using fMRI, neuromelanin MRI, and pupil measures, we demonstrate that locus ceruleus (LC) activity amplifies neural gain such that limited encoding resources focus even more on prioritized mental representations under arousal. For the first time, we also show that LC structure relates to its involvement in threat-related encoding processes. These results shed new light on the brain mechanisms by which we process important information when it is most needed.

7 May 2018 in Nature Human Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLTae-Ho Lee
Tae-Ho Lee
SGSteven Greening
Steven Greening
TUTaiji Ueno
Taiji Ueno
DCDavid Clewett
David Clewett
APAllison Ponzio
Allison Ponzio
MMMara Mather
Mara Mather

14 February 2014 in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTae-Ho Lee
Tae-Ho Lee
MSMichiko Sakaki
Michiko Sakaki
RCRuth Cheng
Ruth Cheng
RVRicardo Velasco
Ricardo Velasco
MMMara Mather
Mara Mather
The arousal-biased competition model predicts that arousal increases the gain on neural competition between stimuli representations. Thus, the model predicts that arousal simultaneously enhances processing of salient stimuli and impairs processing of relatively less-salient stimuli. We tested this model with a simple dot-probe task. On each trial, participants were simultaneously exposed to one face image as a salient cue stimulus and one place image as a non-salient stimulus. A border around the face cue location further increased its bottom-up saliency. Before these visual stimuli were shown, one of two tones played: one that predicted a shock (increasing arousal) or one that did not. An arousal-by-saliency interaction in category-specific brain regions (fusiform face area for salient faces and parahippocampal place area for non-salient places) indicated that brain activation associated with processing the salient stimulus was enhanced under arousal whereas activation associated with processing the non-salient stimulus was suppressed under arousal. This is the first functional magnetic resonance imaging study to demonstrate that arousal can enhance information processing for prioritized stimuli while simultaneously impairing processing of non-prioritized stimuli. Thus, it goes beyond previous research to show that arousal does not uniformly enhance perceptual processing, but instead does so selectively in ways that optimizes attention to highly salient stimuli.

1 April 2017 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMara Mather
Mara Mather
HYHyun Joo Yoo
Hyun Joo Yoo
DCDavid V. Clewett
David V. Clewett
TLTae-Ho Lee
Tae-Ho Lee
SGSteven G. Greening
Steven G. Greening
JTJulian F. Thayer
Julian F. Thayer