Hirokazu Makishima

Dr. Hirokazu Makishima

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2019 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OMOsama Mohamad
Osama Mohamad
Takahiro TabuchiTakahiro Tabuchi
Takahiro Tabuchi
YNYuki Nitta
Yuki Nitta
ANAkihiro Nomoto
Akihiro Nomoto
ASAkira Sato
Akira Sato
TKTadashi Kamada
Tadashi Kamada

6 March 2018 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OMOsama Mohamad
Osama Mohamad
HMHirokazu Makishima
Hirokazu Makishima
TKTadashi Kamada
Tadashi Kamada
Charged particles can achieve better dose distribution and higher biological effectiveness compared to photon radiotherapy. Carbon ions are considered an optimal candidate for cancer treatment using particles. The National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) in Chiba, Japan was the first radiotherapy hospital dedicated for carbon ion treatments in the world. Since its establishment in 1994, the NIRS has pioneered this therapy with more than 69 clinical trials so far, and hundreds of ancillary projects in physics and radiobiology. In this review, we will discuss the evolution of carbon ion radiotherapy at the NIRS and some of the current and future projects in the field.

1 September 2016 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SYShigeru Yamada
Shigeru Yamada
TKTadashi Kamada
Tadashi Kamada
DEDaniel K. Ebner
Daniel K. Ebner
MSMakoto Shinoto
Makoto Shinoto
KTKotaro Terashima
Kotaro Terashima
HMHisahiro Matsubara
Hisahiro Matsubara

1 March 2015
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hitoshi IshikawaHitoshi Ishikawa
Hitoshi Ishikawa
THTakayuki Hashimoto
Takayuki Hashimoto
TMToshikazu Moriwaki
Toshikazu Moriwaki
IHIchinosuke Hyodo
Ichinosuke Hyodo
KHKatsuji Hisakura
Katsuji Hisakura
HSHideyuki Sakurai
Hideyuki Sakurai

11 November 2018 in Cancer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHirokazu Makishima
Hirokazu Makishima
SYShigeo Yasuda
Shigeo Yasuda
YIYuka Isozaki
Yuka Isozaki
GKGoro Kasuya
Goro Kasuya
NONaomi Okada
Naomi Okada
TGthe Liver Cancer Working Group
the Liver Cancer Working Group
Prognosis is usually grim for those with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) who cannot receive resection. Radiation therapy can be an option for those unsuitable for resection, with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) being more effective and less toxic than X‐ray due to its physio‐biological characteristics. The objective of this study is to identify the optimal dose of single fraction CIRT for colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Thirty‐one patients with liver metastasis from CRC were enrolled in the present study. Twenty‐nine patients received a single‐fraction CIRT, escalating the dose from 36 Gy (RBE) in 5% to 10% increments until unacceptable incidence of dose‐limiting toxicity was observed. Dose‐limiting toxicity was defined as grade ≥3 acute toxicity attributed to radiotherapy. The prescribed doses were as follows: 36 Gy (RBE) (3 cases), 40 Gy (2 cases), 44 Gy (4 cases), 46 Gy (6 cases), 48 Gy (3 cases), 53 Gy (8 cases) and 58 Gy (3 cases). Dose‐limiting toxicity was not observed, but late grade 3 liver toxicity due to biliary obstruction was observed in 2 patients at 53 Gy (RBE). Both cases had lesions close to the hepatic portal region, and, therefore, the dose was escalated to 58 Gy (RBE), limited to peripheral lesions. The 3‐year actuarial overall survival rate of all 29 patients was 78%, and the median survival time was 65 months. Local control improved significantly at ≥53 Gy (RBE), with a 3‐year actuarial local control rate of 82%, compared to 28% in lower doses. Treatment for CRC liver metastasis with single‐fraction CIRT appeared to be safe up to 58 Gy (RBE) as long as the central hepatic portal region was avoided.

1 March 2020 in Advances in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SYShigeo Yasuda
Shigeo Yasuda
HKHirotoshi Kato
Hirotoshi Kato
HIHiroshi Imada
Hiroshi Imada
YIYuka Isozaki
Yuka Isozaki
GKGoro Kasuya
Goro Kasuya
HYHiroyuki Yoshidome
Hiroyuki Yoshidome
Carbon ion beams have several physical and biological advantages compared with conventional radiation for cancer therapy. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 2-fraction carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Between December 2008 and March 2013, 57 patients with localized HCC were treated with CIRT at a total dose of 45 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 2 fractions and retrospectively analyzed after long-term observation. The main endpoints of this study were treatment-related toxicity and local tumor control. Toxicity was assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Changes in the Child-Pugh score from before to after CIRT were also examined to evaluate hepatic toxicity. Local control was defined as no progression of the irradiated lesion according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The median age of the patients was 75 years (range, 49-89 years). Of these patients, 41 had a newly diagnosed lesion, and 16 had residual or recurrent lesions after previous treatments. The median follow-up duration was 54 months (range, 7-103 months). All surviving patients were followed for more than 51 months. Two patients experienced grade 3 acute skin reactions, but no other grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed in any organ. No patient exhibited an increase in the Child-Pugh score of 2 or more points after CIRT. The local tumor control rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 98%, 91%, and 91% after CIRT, respectively. All lesions that failed to respond to previous treatments were successfully controlled by CIRT. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 97%, 67%, and 45%, respectively. Two-fraction CIRT was a well-tolerated and effective treatment for patients with HCC.