The chronic, inflammatory skin disorder hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated well documented negative influences on patients’ quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to present more robust data on patients’ QoL impairment by demographic data and its correlation with well-known HS risk factors on a cohort of 1795 German patients. The instrument used for measuring QoL in this study was the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Overall, patients reported a very large effect of HS on their QoL (mean DLQI: 13.2 ± 8.1 points), and 22% of the analyzed population even reported to consider the effect as extremely large. Women tended to experience significantly higher impairment than men (p < 0.001). QoL impairment correlated positively with pain (r = 0.581, p < 0.001), HS severity (measured by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4)) as well as Hurley. Neck involvement tended to decrease QoL significantly more than any other location (14.7 ± 8.3 points). This study confirms the enormous influence of HS on patients’ QoL in a large cohort. Knowledge of QoL impairment in such patients is crucial for proper understanding and holistic management of this disease.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, burdensome skin disease where medical first-line treatment is still limited to long-term, topical and/or systemic antibiotics. The RELIEVE study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of LAight® therapy – a combination of intense pulsed light and radiofrequency – as an adjunct treatment to first-line therapies in Hurley stage I and II HS. Methods: The RELIEVE study was performed as a two-period multicenter randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment. For period A from week 0 to week 16, the 88 participating subjects were randomized into either an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The IG received topical clindamycin 1% solution combined with 8 additional bi-weekly treatments with LAight® therapy. The CG was treated with topical clindamycin 1% solution only. After 16 weeks, patients entered open-label period B and both groups were treated exclusively with LAight® therapy for an additional 16 weeks (8 sessions). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score System (∆IHS4) at week 16 to baseline. Secondary endpoints were DLQI, HiSCR, Pain-NRS, and HADS. Results: In total, from the 88 patients enrolled in RELIEVE, 81 patients were included in the endpoint analysis after period A. After 16 weeks of treatment, the ∆IHS4 of the group treated with the combination of LAight® therapy and topical clindamycin 1% solution was −7.2 ± 6.7 (−60.0%), which was significantly higher in magnitude than the ∆IHS4 in the group treated with clindamycin 1% solution alone (−1.8 ± 5.6, −17.8%, p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints, including other clinical scores as well as patient-reported outcomes, confirmed that the efficacy of the combined treatment was superior to monotherapy. Conclusion: The results of the primary endpoint analysis of period A of the RELIEVE study show that the combined therapy with LAight® and topical clindamycin 1% solution, resulted in a significantly higher decrease in disease severity and an improvement of quality of life in comparison to topical clindamycin 1% solution monotherapy. Treatment was well tolerated, and side effects were all mild and transitory. These data speak for the implementation of the combined treatment as a first-line therapy in Hurley stage I and II HS. LAight® therapy as long-term monotherapy (results from period B), will be analyzed in a consecutive paper.

The advent of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) has significantly improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced BRAF-V600-mutant melanoma. Long-term survivors have been identified particularly among patients with a complete response (CR) to BRAF/MEK-directed targeted therapy (TT). However, it remains unclear which patients who achieved a CR maintain a durable response and whether treatment cessation might be a safe option in these patients. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of treatment cessation on the clinical course of patients with a CR upon BRAF/MEK-directed-TT. We retrospectively selected patients with BRAF-V600-mutant advanced non-resectable melanoma who had been treated with BRAFi ± MEKi therapy and achieved a CR upon treatment out of the multicentric skin cancer registry ADOReg. Data on baseline patient characteristics, duration of TT, treatment cessation, tumor progression (TP) and response to second-line treatments were collected and analyzed. Of 461 patients who received BRAF/MEK-directed TT 37 achieved a CR. TP after initial CR was observed in 22 patients (60%) mainly affecting patients who discontinued TT (n = 22/26), whereas all patients with ongoing TT (n = 11) maintained their CR. Accordingly, patients who discontinued TT had a higher risk of TP compared to patients with ongoing treatment (p < 0.001). However, our data also show that patients who received TT for more than 16 months and who discontinued TT for other reasons than TP or toxicity did not have a shorter PFS compared to patients with ongoing treatment. Response rates to second-line treatment being initiated in 21 patients, varied between 27% for immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and 60% for BRAFi/MEKi rechallenge. In summary, we identified a considerable number of patients who achieved a CR upon BRAF/MEK-directed TT in this contemporary real-world cohort of patients with BRAF-V600-mutant melanoma. Sustained PFS was not restricted to ongoing TT but was also found in patients who discontinued TT.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory disease of the inverse skin regions that occurs in young women, in particular, and affects approximately 1% of the population. Outpatient care is often inadequate and usually cannot prevent progression. Objectives: To evaluate in the EsmAiL (‘Evaluation eines strukturierten und leitlinienbasierten multmodalen Versorgungskonzepts für Menschen mit Akne inversa’) trial whether an innovative care concept can decrease disease activity and burden, and improve patient satisfaction. Methods: EsmAiL was conducted as a two-arm, multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial that included 553 adults with HS. Inclusion criteria were a minimum of three inflammatory lesions and at least a moderate impact of the disease on quality of life. The control group (CG) remained under standard care, while patients in the intervention group (IG) were treated according to a trial-specific, multimodal concept. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4). Results: In total, 274 patients were randomized to the IG and 279 to the CG. Altogether, 377 attended the final assessment after 12 months of intervention. Participants in the IG (n = 203) achieved a mean improvement in IHS4 of 9.3 points, while the average decrease in IHS4 in patients in the CG (n = 174) was 5.7 points (P = 0.003). Patients treated under the new care concept also reported a statistically significantly higher decrease in pain, Dermatology Life Quality Index and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores compared with those in the CG (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was also statistically significantly higher in the IG compared with the CG (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The establishment of standardized treatment algorithms in so-called ‘acne inversa centres’ in the ambulatory setting has a substantial, positive impact on the course of HS and significantly improves patient satisfaction.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, inflammatory, burdensome skin disease where current first-line treatments are limited to topical and/or systemic antibiotics which cannot be applied for long-term disease management. Period B of the RELIEVE study analyzes whether LAight® therapy can sustain or even increase remission after a first topical antibiotic treatment cycle. Methods: The RELIEVE study was performed as a two-period multicenter randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment. For period A from week 0 to week 16, the 88 participating Hurley I and II patients were randomized to either a group receiving topical clindamycin 1% solution combined with 8 additional bi-weekly treatments with LAight® therapy (group TC + L) or a group which was treated with topical clindamycin 1% solution only (group TC). After 16 weeks, patients entered open-label period B and both groups were treated exclusively with LAight® therapy for an additional 16 weeks (8 sessions, group TC + L/L and group TC/L). Results: In total, 88 patients were enrolled in RELIEVE. Seventy-eight patients entered period B; 39 belonged to group TC + L/L and 39 to group TC/L. The IHS4-response at the start of period B was 62% (group TC + L/L) and 33% (group TC + L). During the 16 weeks of additional monotherapy with LAight, in both groups >90% of patients who responded to therapy in period A maintained their IHS4-response at week 32. IHS4 response rates continued to rise up to 79% of the TC + L/L group and up to 71% of the TC/L group during period B at week 32. Achievement of HiSCR and certain patient reported outcomes confirmed primary endpoint results. Conclusion: LAight® therapy is an effective approved therapy option for Hurley I and II HS that can be used continuously to maintain treatment success. During 16 weeks of follow-up in period B, over 90% of patients with response after period A maintained their treatment outcome, while more than 60% of prior nonresponders gained response. The fact that LAight® therapy can be applied continuously, is very effective and is well tolerated makes it a valuable treatment tool in the design of HS long-term treatment modalities.