Joe Sullivan

Dr. Joe Sullivan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 1994 in Photosynthesis Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ATAlan H. Teramura
Alan H. Teramura
JSJoe Sullivan
Joe Sullivan

1 January 1990 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJoe Sullivan
Joe Sullivan
ATAlan H. Teramura
Alan H. Teramura
Soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv Essex, plants were grown in the field in a 2 × 2 factorial design, under ambient and supplemental levels of ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation (supplemental daily dose of 5.1 effective kilojoules per square meter) and were either well-watered or subjected to drought. Soil water potentials were reduced to −2.0 megapascals by the exclusion of natural precipitation in the drought plots and were maintained at approximately −0.5 megapascal by supplemental irrigation in well-watered plots. Plant growth and gas exchange characteristics were affected under both drought and supplemental UV-B radiation. Whole-leaf gas exchange analysis indicated that stomatal limitations on photosynthesis were only significantly affected by the combination of UV-B radiation and drought but substrate (ribulose bisphosphate) regeneration limitations were observed under either stress. The combined effect of both drought and UV-B radiation on photosynthetic gas exchange was a reduction in apparent quantum efficiency and the rapid appearance of biochemical limitations to photosynthesis concomitant with reduced diffusional limitations. However, the combination of stresses did not result in additive effects on total plant growth or seed yield compared to reductions under either stress independently.

1 October 1990 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAlan H. Teramura
Alan H. Teramura
JSJoe Sullivan
Joe Sullivan
LZLewis H. Ziska
Lewis H. Ziska
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Bannock), rice (Oryza sativa L. cv IR-36), and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr cv Essex) were grown in a factorial greenhouse experiment to determine if CO2-induced increases in photosynthesis, biomass, and yield are modified by increases in ultraviolet (UV)-B radiation corresponding to stratospheric ozone depletion. The experimental conditions simulated were: (a) an increase in CO2 concentration from 350 to 650 microliters per liter; (b) an increase in UV-B radiation corresponding to a 10% ozone depletion at the equator; and (c) a and b in combination. Seed yield and total biomass increased significantly with elevated CO2 in all three species when compared to the control. However, with concurrent increases in UV-B and CO2, no increase in either seed yield (wheat and rice) or total biomass (rice) was observed with respect to the control. In contrast, CO2-induced increases in seed yield and total plant biomass were maintained or increased in soybean within the elevated CO2, UV-B environment. Whole leaf gas exchange indicated a significant increase in photosynthesis, apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) and water-use-efficiency (WUE) with elevated CO2 in all 3 species. Including elevated UV-B radiation with high CO2 eliminated the effect of high CO2 on photosynthesis and WUE in rice and the increase in AQE associated with high CO2 in all species. Elevated CO2 did not change the apparent carboxylation efficiency (ACE) in the three species although the combination of elevated CO2 and UV-B reduced ACE in wheat and rice. The results of this experiment illustrate that increased UV-B radiation may modify CO2-induced increases in biomass, seed yield and photosynthetic parameters and suggest that available data may not adequately characterize the potential effect of future, simultaneous changes in CO2 concentration and UV-B radiation.

1 September 1990 in Physiologia Plantarum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ATAlan H. Teramura
Alan H. Teramura
JSJoe Sullivan
Joe Sullivan
JLJohn Lydon
John Lydon

9 May 2003 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DZDuli Zhao
Duli Zhao
KRKambham Raja Reddy
Kambham Raja Reddy
VKVijaya Gopal Kakani
Vijaya Gopal Kakani
JRJ. J. Read
J. J. Read
JSJoe Sullivan
Joe Sullivan
Better understanding of crop responses to projected changes in climate is an important requirement. An experiment was conducted in sunlit, controlled environment chambers known as soil–plant–atmosphere–research units to determine the interactive effects of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration [CO2] and ultraviolet‐B (UV‐B) radiation on cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) growth, development and leaf photosynthetic characteristics. Six treatments were used, comprising two levels of [CO2] (360 and 720 µmol mol−1) and three levels of 0 (control), 7.7 and 15.1 kJ m−2 d−1biologically effective UV‐B radiations within each CO2level. Treatments were imposed for 66 d from emergence until 3 weeks after the first flower stage. Plants grown in elevated [CO2] had greater leaf area and higher leaf photosynthesis, non‐structural carbohydrates, and total biomass than plants in ambient [CO2]. Neither dry matter partitioning among plant organs nor pigment concentrations was affected by elevated [CO2]. On the other hand, high UV‐B (15.1 kJ m−2 d−1) radiation treatment altered growth resulting in shorter stem and branch lengths and smaller leaf area. Shorter plants at high UV‐B radiation were related to internode lengths rather than the number of mainstem nodes. Fruit dry matter accumulation was most sensitive to UV‐B radiation due to fruit abscission. Even under 7.7 kJ m−2 d−1of UV‐B radiation, fruit dry weight was significantly lower than the control although total biomass and leaf photosynthesis did not differ from the control. The UV‐B radiation of 15.1 kJ m−2 d−1reduced both total (43%) and fruit (88%) dry weights due to smaller leaf area and lower leaf net photosynthesis. Elevated [CO2] did not ameliorate the adverse effects of UV‐B radiation on cotton growth and physiology, particularly the boll retention under UV‐B stress.

12 June 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPierre Lau
Pierre Lau
VBVaughn Bryant
Vaughn Bryant
JEJames D. Ellis
James D. Ellis
ZHZachary Y. Huang
Zachary Y. Huang
JSJoe Sullivan
Joe Sullivan
JRJuliana Rangel
Juliana Rangel
For honey bees (Apis mellifera), colony maintenance and growth are highly dependent on worker foragers obtaining sufficient resources from flowering plants year round. Despite the importance of floral diversity for proper bee nutrition, urban development has drastically altered resource availability and diversity for these important pollinators. Therefore, understanding the floral resources foraged by bees in urbanized areas is key to identifying and promoting plants that enhance colony health in those environments. In this study, we identified the pollen foraged by bees in four developed areas of the U.S., and explored whether there were spatial or temporal differences in the types of floral sources of pollen used by honey bees in these landscapes. To do this, pollen was collected every month for up to one year from colonies located in developed (urban and suburban) sites in California, Texas, Florida, and Michigan, except during months of pollen dearth or winter. Homogenized pollen samples were acetolyzed and identified microscopically to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Once identified, each pollen type was classified into a frequency category based on its overall relative abundance. Species richness and diversity indices were also calculated and compared across states and seasons. We identified up to 64 pollen types belonging to 39 plant families in one season (California). Species richness was highest in CA and lowest in TX, and was highest during spring in every state. In particular, “predominant” and “secondary” pollen types belonged to the families Arecaceae, Sapindaceae, Anacardiaceae, Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Lythraceae, Myrtaceae, Rhamnaceae, Rosaceae, Rutaceae, Saliaceae, and Ulmaceae. This study will help broaden our understanding of honey bee foraging ecology and nutrition in urban environments, and will help promote the use of plants that serve the dual purpose of providing aesthetic value and nutritious forage for honey bee colonies placed in developed landscapes.