Corinna Glasner

Dr. Corinna Glasner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in Critical Reviews in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FCFrancis Michael Cavallo
Francis Michael Cavallo
LJLorea Jordana
Lorea Jordana
AFAlex Friedrich
Alex Friedrich
CGCorinna Glasner
Corinna Glasner
JDJan Maarten Van Dijl
Jan Maarten Van Dijl
Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus is a small Deltaproteobacterium which, since its discovery, has distinguished itself for the unique ability to prey on other Gram-negative bacteria. The studies on this particular “predatory bacterium”, have gained momentum in response to the rising problem of antibiotic resistance, because it could be applied as a potential probiotic and antibiotic agent. Hereby, we present recent advances in the study of B. bacteriovorus, comprehending fundamental aspects of its biology, obligatory intracellular life cycle, predation resistance, and potential applications. Furthermore, we discuss studies that pave the road towards the use of B. bacteriovorus as a “living antibiotic” in human therapy, focussing on its interaction with biofilms, the host immune response, predation susceptibility and in vivo application models. The available data imply that it will be possible to upgrade this predator bacterium from a predominantly academic interest to an instrument that could confront antibiotic resistant infections.

12 August 2023 in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCansu Cimen
Cansu Cimen
MBMatthijs S. Berends
Matthijs S. Berends
EBErik Bathoorn
Erik Bathoorn
MLMariëtte Lokate
Mariëtte Lokate
AVAndreas Voss
Andreas Voss
AHAxel Hamprecht
Axel Hamprecht
The rising prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is a matter of concern in hospital settings across Europe without a distinct geographical pattern. In this scoping review, we compared the epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. in hospitals in the Netherlands and Germany, between 1991 and 2022. We searched PubMed and summarized the national antibiotic resistance surveillance data of the two countries. We included 46 studies and summarized national surveillance data from the NethMap in the Netherlands, the National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance database in Germany, and the EARS-Net data. In total, 12 studies were conducted in hospitals in the Netherlands, 32 were conducted in German hospitals, and an additional two studies were conducted in a cross-border setting. The most significant difference between the two countries was that studies in Germany showed an increasing trend in the prevalence of VRE in hospitals, and no such trend was observed in studies in the Netherlands. Furthermore, in both Dutch and German hospitals, it has been revealed that the molecular epidemiology of VREfm has shifted from a predominance of vanA towards vanB over the years. According to national surveillance reports, vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates fluctuates below 1% in Dutch hospitals, whereas it follows an increasing trend in German hospitals (above 20%), as supported by individual studies. This review demonstrates that VRE is more frequently encountered in German than in Dutch hospitals and discusses the underlying factors for the difference in VRE occurrence in these two neighboring countries by comparing differences in healthcare systems, infection prevention control (IPC) guidelines, and antibiotic use in the Netherlands and Germany.

1 February 2015 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGCorinna Glasner
Corinna Glasner
GPG. Pluister
G. Pluister
HWHenrik Westh
Henrik Westh
JAJ.P. Arends
J.P. Arends
JEJ. Empel
J. Empel
JDJan Maarten Van Dijl
Jan Maarten Van Dijl

3 February 2022 in Eurosurveillance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CGCorinna Glasner
Corinna Glasner
Matthijs S. BerendsMatthijs S. Berends
Matthijs S. Berends
Karsten BeckerKarsten Becker
Karsten Becker
JEJutta Esser
Jutta Esser
JGJens Gieffers
Jens Gieffers
AFAlex Friedrich
Alex Friedrich
Background: Antimicrobial resistance poses a risk for healthcare, both in the community and hospitals. The spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) occurs mostly on a local and regional level, following movement of patients, but also occurs across national borders. Aim: The aim of this observational study was to determine the prevalence of MDROs in a European cross-border region to understand differences and improve infection prevention based on real-time routine data and workflows. Methods: Between September 2017 and June 2018, 23 hospitals in the Dutch (NL)–German (DE) cross-border region (BR) participated in the study. During 8 consecutive weeks, patients were screened upon admission to intensive care units (ICUs) for nasal carriage of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and rectal carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium/E. faecalis (VRE), third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCRE) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). All samples were processed in the associated laboratories. Results: A total of 3,365 patients were screened (median age: 68 years (IQR: 57–77); male/female ratio: 59.7/40.3; NL-BR: n = 1,202; DE-BR: n = 2,163). Median screening compliance was 60.4% (NL-BR: 56.9%; DE-BR: 62.9%). MDRO prevalence was higher in DE-BR than in NL-BR, namely 1.7% vs 0.6% for MRSA (p = 0.006), 2.7% vs 0.1% for VRE (p < 0.001) and 6.6% vs 3.6% for 3GCRE (p < 0.001), whereas CRE prevalence was comparable (0.2% in DE-BR vs 0.0% in NL-BR ICUs). Conclusions: This first prospective multicentre screening study in a European cross-border region shows high heterogenicity in MDRO carriage prevalence in NL-BR and DE-BR ICUs. This indicates that the prevalence is probably influenced by the different healthcare structures.

24 May 2019 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLChristian Friedemann Luz
Christian Friedemann Luz
Matthijs S. BerendsMatthijs S. Berends
Matthijs S. Berends
JDJan-Willem H Dik
Jan-Willem H Dik
MLMariëtte Lokate
Mariëtte Lokate
CPCéline Pulcini
Céline Pulcini
Bhanu SinhaBhanu Sinha
Bhanu Sinha
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: Analyzing process and outcome measures for patients suspected of or having an infection in an entire hospital requires processing large datasets and accounting for numerous patient parameters and guidelines. Rapid, reproducible and adaptable analyses usually need substantial technical expertise but can yield valuable insight for infection management and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams. Objective: We describe a software application (RadaR - Rapid analysis of diagnostic and antimicrobial patterns in R) for infection management allowing user-friendly, intuitive and interactive analyses of large datasets without prior in-depth software or programming knowledge. Methods: RadaR was built in the open source programming language R using Shiny, an additional package to implement web-application frameworks in R. RadaR was developed in the context of a 1339-bed academic tertiary referral hospital to handle data of more than 180,000 admissions. Results: RadaR visualizes analytical graphs and statistical summaries in a rapid and interactive manner. Users can filter patient groups by 17 different criteria and investigate antimicrobial use, microbiological diagnostic use and results including antimicrobial resistance, and outcome in length of stay. Results can easily be stratified and grouped to compare defined patient groups based on individual patient features. Conclusions: AMS teams can use RadaR to identify areas within their institutions that might benefit from increased support and targeted interventions. Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures can be assessed and analyses can easily be visualized and communicated. RadaR demonstrates the feasibility of developing software tools for infection management and AMS teams in an open source approach making it free to use and adaptable to different settings.

26 January 2018 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRobin Köck
Robin Köck
PSPhilipp Siemer
Philipp Siemer
JEJutta Esser
Jutta Esser
SKStefanie Kampmeier
Stefanie Kampmeier
Matthijs S. BerendsMatthijs S. Berends
Matthijs S. Berends
AFAlex Friedrich
Alex Friedrich
Preventing the spread of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDRGNB) is a public health priority. However, the definition of MDRGNB applied for planning infection prevention measures such as barrier precautions differs depending on national guidelines. This is particularly relevant in the Dutch–German border region, where patients are transferred between healthcare facilities located in the two different countries, because clinicians and infection control personnel must understand antibiograms indicating MDRGNB from both sides of the border and using both national guidelines. This retrospective study aimed to compare antibiograms of Gram-negative bacteria and classify them using the Dutch and German national standards for MDRGNB definition. A total of 31,787 antibiograms from six Dutch and four German hospitals were classified. Overall, 73.7% were no MDRGNB according to both guidelines. According to the Dutch and German guideline, 7772/31,787 (24.5%) and 4586/31,787 (12.9%) were MDRGNB, respectively (p < 0.0001). Major divergent classifications were observed for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) -producing Enterobacteriaceae, non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The observed differences show that medical staff must carefully check previous diagnostic findings when patients are transferred across the Dutch–German border, as it cannot be assumed that MDRGNB requiring special hygiene precautions are marked in the transferred antibiograms in accordance with both national guidelines.