Bradford Dickerson

Dr. Bradford Dickerson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 July 2008 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BDBradford Dickerson
Bradford Dickerson
ABAkram Bakkour
Akram Bakkour
DSDavid H. Salat
David H. Salat
EFEric Feczko
Eric Feczko
JPJenni Pacheco
Jenni Pacheco
RBRandy L. Buckner
Randy L. Buckner
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with neurodegeneration in vulnerable limbic and heteromodal regions of the cerebral cortex, detectable in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging. It is not clear whether abnormalities of cortical anatomy in AD can be reliably measured across different subject samples, how closely they track symptoms, and whether they are detectable prior to symptoms. An exploratory map of cortical thinning in mild AD was used to define regions of interest that were applied in a hypothesis-driven fashion to other subject samples. Results demonstrate a reliably quantifiable in vivo signature of abnormal cortical anatomy in AD, which parallels known regional vulnerability to AD neuropathology. Thinning in vulnerable cortical regions relates to symptom severity even in the earliest stages of clinical symptoms. Furthermore, subtle thinning is present in asymptomatic older controls with brain amyloid binding as detected with amyloid imaging. The reliability and clinical validity of AD-related cortical thinning suggests potential utility as an imaging biomarker. This “disease signature” approach to cortical morphometry, in which disease effects are mapped across the cortical mantle and then used to define ROIs for hypothesis-driven analyses, may provide a powerful methodological framework for studies of neuropsychiatric diseases.

23 September 2009 in Neuropsychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BDBradford Dickerson
Bradford Dickerson
HEHoward Eichenbaum
Howard Eichenbaum
The ability to encode and retrieve our daily personal experiences, called episodic memory, is supported by the circuitry of the medial temporal lobe (MTL), including the hippocampus, which interacts extensively with a number of specific distributed cortical and subcortical structures. In both animals and humans, evidence from anatomical, neuropsychological, and physiological studies indicates that cortical components of this system have key functions in several aspects of perception and cognition, whereas the MTL structures mediate the organization and persistence of the network of memories whose details are stored in those cortical areas. Structures within the MTL, and particularly the hippocampus, have distinct functions in combining information from multiple cortical streams, supporting our ability to encode and retrieve details of events that compose episodic memories. Conversely, selective damage in the hippocampus, MTL, and other structures of the large-scale memory system, or deterioration of these areas in several diseases and disorders, compromises episodic memory. A growing body of evidence is converging on a functional organization of the cortical, subcortical, and MTL structures that support the fundamental features of episodic memory in humans and animals.

28 June 2004 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BDBradford Dickerson
Bradford Dickerson
DSDavid H. Salat
David H. Salat
JBJulianna F. Bates
Julianna F. Bates
MAMonika Atiya
Monika Atiya
RKRonald Killiany
Ronald Killiany
RSReisa A. Sperling
Reisa A. Sperling

1 October 2011 in Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPStéphane P. Poulin
Stéphane P. Poulin
RDRebecca Dautoff
Rebecca Dautoff
JMJohn C. Morris
John C. Morris
LBLisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett
BDBradford Dickerson
Bradford Dickerson

19 April 2011 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BDBradford Dickerson
Bradford Dickerson
TST.R. Stoub
T.R. Stoub
RSR.C. Shah
R.C. Shah
RSR.A. Sperling
R.A. Sperling
RKRonald Killiany
Ronald Killiany
LDL. Detoledo-Morrell
L. Detoledo-Morrell
Objective: Since Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathology is thought to develop years before dementia, it may be possible to detect subtle AD-related atrophy in preclinical AD. Here we hypothesized that the “disease signature” of AD-related cortical thinning, previously identified in patients with mild AD dementia, would be useful as a biomarker to detect anatomic abnormalities consistent with AD in cognitively normal (CN) adults who develop AD dementia after longitudinal follow-up. Methods: We studied 2 independent samples of adults who were CN when scanned. In sample 1, 8 individuals developing AD dementia (CN-AD converters) after an average of 11.1 years were compared to 25 individuals who remained CN (CN-stable). In sample 2, 7 CN-AD converters (average follow-up 7.1 years) were compared to 25 CN-stable individuals. Results: AD-signature cortical thinning in CN-AD converters in both samples was remarkably similar, about 0.2 mm (p < 0.05). Despite this small absolute difference, Cohen d effect sizes for these differences were very large (>1). Of the 11 CN individuals with baseline low AD-signature thickness (≥1 SD below cohort mean), 55% developed AD dementia over nearly the next decade, while none of the 9 high AD-signature thickness individuals (≥1 SD above mean) developed dementia. This marker predicted time to diagnosis of dementia (hazard ratio = 3.4, p < 0.0005); 1 SD of thinning increased dementia risk by 3.4. Conclusions: By focusing on cortical regions known to be affected in AD dementia, subtle but reliable atrophy is identifiable in asymptomatic individuals nearly a decade before dementia, making this measure a potentially important imaging biomarker of early neurodegeneration.