Borut Peterlin

Prof. Dr. Borut Peterlin

Division of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2016 in European Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLidewij Henneman
Lidewij Henneman
PBPascal Borry
Pascal Borry
DCDavit Chokoshvili
Davit Chokoshvili
MCMartina C Cornel
Martina C Cornel
CECarla G van El
Carla G van El
BPBorut Peterlin
Borut Peterlin
This document of the European Society of Human Genetics contains recommendations regarding responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening. Carrier screening is defined here as the detection of carrier status of recessive diseases in couples or persons who do not have an a priori increased risk of being a carrier based on their or their partners’ personal or family history. Expanded carrier screening offers carrier screening for multiple autosomal and X-linked recessive disorders, facilitated by new genetic testing technologies, and allows testing of individuals regardless of ancestry or geographic origin. Carrier screening aims to identify couples who have an increased risk of having an affected child in order to facilitate informed reproductive decision making. In previous decades, carrier screening was typically performed for one or few relatively common recessive disorders associated with significant morbidity, reduced life-expectancy and often because of a considerable higher carrier frequency in a specific population for certain diseases. New genetic testing technologies enable the expansion of screening to multiple conditions, genes or sequence variants. Expanded carrier screening panels that have been introduced to date have been advertised and offered to health care professionals and the public on a commercial basis. This document discusses the challenges that expanded carrier screening might pose in the context of the lessons learnt from decades of population-based carrier screening and in the context of existing screening criteria. It aims to contribute to the public and professional discussion and to arrive at better clinical and laboratory practice guidelines.

25 March 2014 in Genome Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCatherine A. Brownstein
Catherine A. Brownstein
ABAlan H. Beggs
Alan H. Beggs
NHNils Homer
Nils Homer
BMBarry Merriman
Barry Merriman
TYTimothy W Yu
Timothy W Yu
DMDavid M Margulies
David M Margulies
Background: There is tremendous potential for genome sequencing to improve clinical diagnosis and care once it becomes routinely accessible, but this will require formalizing research methods into clinical best practices in the areas of sequence data generation, analysis, interpretation and reporting. The CLARITY Challenge was designed to spur convergence in methods for diagnosing genetic disease starting from clinical case history and genome sequencing data. DNA samples were obtained from three families with heritable genetic disorders and genomic sequence data were donated by sequencing platform vendors. The challenge was to analyze and interpret these data with the goals of identifying disease-causing variants and reporting the findings in a clinically useful format. Participating contestant groups were solicited broadly, and an independent panel of judges evaluated their performance. Results: A total of 30 international groups were engaged. The entries reveal a general convergence of practices on most elements of the analysis and interpretation process. However, even given this commonality of approach, only two groups identified the consensus candidate variants in all disease cases, demonstrating a need for consistent fine-tuning of the generally accepted methods. There was greater diversity of the final clinical report content and in the patient consenting process, demonstrating that these areas require additional exploration and standardization. Conclusions: The CLARITY Challenge provides a comprehensive assessment of current practices for using genome sequencing to diagnose and report genetic diseases. There is remarkable convergence in bioinformatic techniques, but medical interpretation and reporting are areas that require further development by many groups.

1 July 2005 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RGRandall B. Graham
Randall B. Graham
MNMelissa Nolasco
Melissa Nolasco
BPBorut Peterlin
Borut Peterlin
CGChristine Kim Garcia
Christine Kim Garcia
Rationale: Approximately 10% of patients who have a spontaneous pneumothorax have a positive family history. Objectives: We sought to identify DNA sequence variations that confer susceptibility to pneumothoraces. Methods: We collected 12 families that had at least 2 first-degree relatives with a spontaneous pneumothorax. All affected family members had no obvious stigmata of known genetic disorders associated with pneumothoraces. We used haplotype analysis, DNA sequencing, and restriction fragment analysis of mutations to evaluate the individuals in these families. Main Results: In 2 of the 12 families the disorder cosegregated with markers flanking a candidate locus, FLCN. Sequencing the linked alleles revealed 2 mutations predicted to introduce premature stop codons in 2 of the 12 families. Most mutations in FLCN cause a rare disease, Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome, characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance of multiple benign skin lesions, renal tumors, pulmonary blebs, and pneumothoraces. None of the family members with the nonsense mutations had the skin manifestations of Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome or renal cancer. Pathologic examination of lung tissue from three affected nonsmokers revealed blebs and underlying emphysema. Conclusions: Isolated familial spontaneous pneumothorax can be caused by mutations of the FLCN gene. Because development of a pneumothorax and/or pulmonary blebs may be the earliest or the only clinical manifestation of FLCN mutations, pulmonologists should be alert to the contribution of this gene toward this familial form of emphysema.

10 September 2019 in Frontiers in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKeli Hočevar
Keli Hočevar
AMAleš Maver
Aleš Maver
MŠMarijana Vidmar Šimic
Marijana Vidmar Šimic
AHAlenka Hodžić
Alenka Hodžić
Alexander G. HaslbergerAlexander G. Haslberger
Alexander G. Haslberger
BPBorut Peterlin
Borut Peterlin
Background: Preterm delivery (PTD) represents an important public health and therapeutic challenge. Despite the reported link between the composition of vaginal microbiome and PTD, previous studies were inconsistent in their conclusions and utilized non-uniform designs. We performed an independent case-control study carried out on the Slovenian population, where we re-evaluated the role of the vaginal microbiome in PTD. Methods: Vaginal microbiomes of pregnant women who delivered preterm were compared to those delivered at term to examine differences in the microbial richness, diversity, and differential abundance of specific taxa. We obtained vaginal swab samples from 155 Caucasian women who were classified as either term (≥380/7 weeks, n = 107) or preterm (≤366/7 weeks, n = 48) in exclusion of any other medical or obstetric conditions. The vaginal microbiomes of these women were characterized by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing of the V3-V4 region on the MiSeq platform. Results: Women who experienced PTD had a higher microbial richness (Chao1, P = 0.011) and alpha diversity (Shannon, P = 0.00059) than women with term deliveries. We report that overall vaginal microbial community composition (beta-diversity) was significantly different by delivery gestational age category (PWeightedUnifrac < 0.001). Women who delivered preterm had decreased Lactobacilli spp. abundance as well as increased abundance of Gardnerella and other bacterial vaginosis (BV) and aerobic vaginitis (AV) associated genera including Atopobium, Sneathia, Gemella, Megasphaera, Dorea, Streptococcus, and Escherichia/Shigella. Conclusions: In the present study, we provide further evidence that vaginal microbiome composition is associated with PTD.

5 June 2019 in Genetics in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
THTzung-Chien Hsieh
Tzung-Chien Hsieh
MMMartin A. Mensah
Martin A. Mensah
JPJean T. Pantel
Jean T. Pantel
DADione Aguilar
Dione Aguilar
OBOmri Bar
Omri Bar
PKPeter M. Krawitz
Peter M. Krawitz
Purpose Phenotype information is crucial for the interpretation of genomic variants. So far it has only been accessible for bioinformatics workflows after encoding into clinical terms by expert dysmorphologists. Methods Here, we introduce an approach driven by artificial intelligence that uses portrait photographs for the interpretation of clinical exome data. We measured the value added by computer-assisted image analysis to the diagnostic yield on a cohort consisting of 679 individuals with 105 different monogenic disorders. For each case in the cohort we compiled frontal photos, clinical features, and the disease-causing variants, and simulated multiple exomes of different ethnic backgrounds. Results The additional use of similarity scores from computer-assisted analysis of frontal photos improved the top 1 accuracy rate by more than 20–89% and the top 10 accuracy rate by more than 5–99% for the disease-causing gene. Conclusion Image analysis by deep-learning algorithms can be used to quantify the phenotypic similarity (PP4 criterion of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines) and to advance the performance of bioinformatics pipelines for exome analysis.

1 January 2002 in Human Reproduction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBorut Peterlin
Borut Peterlin
Tanja KunejTanja Kunej
Tanja Kunej
JSJ. Sinkovec
J. Sinkovec
NGN. Gligorievska
N. Gligorievska
BZB. Zorn
B. Zorn
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions in the Slovenian population of infertile men and to analyse the consequences of mutation in respect to clinical severity and prognosis. METHODS: In a controlled clinical study at the university-based medical genetics service and infertility clinic, 226 infertile men undergoing ICSI were tested. The main outcome measures included polymerase chain reaction amplification of 16 genes and gene families and 42 sequence-tagged sites in the non-recombining region of the Y chromosome, semen, testicular volume and testicular histological analysis, serum FSH concentrations, fertilization and respective pregnancy rates. RESULTS: The incidence of deletions was 4.4%: 8.6% in men with azoospermia and 1.5% in men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Isolated gene deletions were not identified. No statistically significant differences in clinical outcome measures were found in patients with mutations versus patients without mutations. High fertilization (49%) and pregnancy (43%) rates with sperm of patients with Y chromosome deletions were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for gene-specific microdeletions does not contribute significantly to the sensitivity of microdeletion test. Fertilization and pregnancy rates obtained using sperm of patients with Y chromosome deletions were comparable with those achieved in conventional IVF.