Hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hypoxia has proven to be involved in multiple tumor biological processes and associated with malignant progression and resistance to therapy. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a well-established locoregional therapy for patients with unresectable HCC. However, TACE-induced hypoxia regulates tumor angiogenesis, energy metabolism, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and immune processes through hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), which may have adverse effects on the therapeutic efficacy of TACE. Hypoxia has emerged as a promising target for combination with TACE in the treatment of HCC. This review summarizes the impact of hypoxia on HCC tumor biology and the adverse effects of TACE-induced hypoxia on its therapeutic efficacy, highlighting the therapeutic potential of hypoxia-targeted therapy in combination with TACE for HCC.

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of local ablation plus PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab in previously treated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods: In the multicenter, two-stage, and randomized phase 1/2 trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive toripalimab alone (240 mg, every 3 weeks), subtotal local ablation followed by toripalimab starting on post-ablation day 3 (Schedule D3), or on post-ablation day 14 (Schedule D14). The first endpoint of stage 1 was to determine which combination schedule could continue and progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint for stage 1/2. Results: A total of 146 patients were recruited. During stage 1, Schedule D3 achieved numerically higher objective response rate (ORR) than Schedule D14 for non-ablation lesions (37.5% vs. 31.3%), and was chosen for stage 2 evaluation. For the entire cohort of both stages, patients with Schedule D3 had a significantly higher ORR than with toripalimab alone (33.8% vs. 16.9%; P = 0.027). Moreover, patients with Schedule D3 had improved median PFS (7.1 vs. 3.8 months; P < 0.001) and median overall survival (18.4 vs. 13.2 months; P = 0.005), as compared with toripalimab alone. In addition, six (9%) patients with toripalimab, eight (12%) with Schedule D3, and 4 (25%) with Schedule D14 developed grade 3 or 4 adverse events, and one patient (2%) with Schedule D3 manifested grade 5 treatment-related pneumonitis. Conclusions: In patients with previously treated unresectable HCC, subtotal ablation plus toripalimab improved the clinical efficacy as compared with toripalimab alone, with an acceptable safety profile.

Background: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) have been progressively used in cancer treatment and produced unique toxicity profiles. This systematic review aims to comprehend the patterns and occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) based on ICI.Methods: PICOS/PRISMA methods were used to identify published English-language on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from 2015 to 2020. Published clinical trials on ICI monotherapy, combined ICIs, and ICI plus other treatment with tabulated data on grade≥3 trAEs were included. Odds ratio (OR), χ² tests were used to analyze for effect size and associations.Results: This review included 145 clinical trials involving 21786 patients. Grade 3-5 trAEs were more common with ICI when they were plused with other treatments compared with ICI monotherapy(54.3% versus 17.7%, 46.1%, p<0.05). Grade 3-5 trAEs were also more common with CTLA-4 mAbs compared with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 (34.2% versus 15.1%, 13.6%, p<0.05). Hyperthyroidism (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.7–8.6), nausea (OR 3.7, 95%CI 2.5–5.3), diarrhea (OR 2.7, 95%CI 2.2–3.2), colitis (OR 3.4, 95%CI 2.7–4.3), ALT increase (OR 4.9, 95%CI 3.9–6.1), AST increase (OR 3.8, 95%CI 3.0–4.9), pruritus (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.5–3.9), rash (OR 2.8, 95%CI 2.1–3.8), fatigue (OR 2.8, 95%CI 2.2–3.7), decreased appetite (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.5–3.8), and hypophysitis (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.2–3.3) were more frequent with combined ICIs. Diarrhea (OR 8.1, 95%CI 6.4–10.3), colitis (OR 12.2, 95%CI 8.7–17.1), ALT increase (OR 5.1, 95%CI 3.5–7.4), AST increase (OR 4.2, 95%CI 2.8–6.3), pruritus (OR 4.1, 95%CI 2.0–8.4), rash (OR 4.4, 95%CI 2.9–6.8), hypophysitis (OR 12.1, 95%CI 6.3–23.4) were more common with CTLA-4 mAbs; whereas pneumonitis (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.1–10.3) were more frequent with PD-1 mAbs.Conclusions: Different immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with different treatment-related adverse events profiles. A comprehensive data in this systematic review will provide comprehensive information for clinicians.

Background: Diabetes is prevalent among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. Although the hypoglycemic drug metformin has shown antitumor effects, its potential positive effect on patients with HCC and diabetes undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of metformin in patients with HCC and type II diabetes who are receiving TACE. Materials and methods: This retrospective study involved 372 consecutive patients with HCC and type II diabetes across three medical centers between January 2014 and June 2021. All patients underwent TACE. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to compare all-cause death between the metformin and nonmetformin groups while competing risk regression was performed to assess cancer-specific death. Results: Among 372 patients included in the study, 208 patients (177 male patients and 31 female patients) with a mean age of 59.6 (10.3) years received metformin, and 164 patients (139 male patients and 25 female patients) with a mean age of 60.3 (10.0) years did not. Before PSM, patients with metformin had significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) than those without metformin (mOS: 34 months, 95% CI: 25.6–42.4 vs. 20 months, 95% CI: 15.3–24.7; P <0.001; mPFS: 11 months, 95% CI: 9.3–12.7 vs. 8 months, 95% CI: 5.9–10.1; P <0.001). Similar results were observed after PSM. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that metformin was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.589, 95% CI: 0.454–0.763; P <0.001) and tumor progression (HR: 0.667, 95% CI: 0.526–0.845; P =0.001) before PSM. After excluding deaths related to other factors, metformin continued to demonstrate a reduction in cancer-specific mortality risk among the patients. Subgroup analysis further revealed that patients using metformin had lower all-cause mortality risk and tumor progression risk than those without metformin in most subgroups. Adverse event evaluation suggested that metformin could lead to elevated nausea incidence. Conclusion: Metformin may confer survival benefits to patients with HCC and type II diabetes undergoing TACE. Metformin may simultaneously address multiple aspects of treatment in these patients.

Time-dependent diffusion MRI can be used to effectively evaluate liver fibrosis grading, potentially enabling noninvasive assessment of treatment efficacy and facilitating personalized clinical treatment.

Background: The prognostic significance of the CRAFITY score (CRP and AFP in ImmunoTherapY) has been demonstrated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving immunotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility and the predictive value of CRAFITY score in HCC after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy. Materials and methods: Data from patients with advanced HCC treated with TACE plus TKIs and PD-1 inhibitor from January 2019 to June 2022 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients with AFP ≥ 100 ng/mL and those with CRP ≥ 1 mg/dL were assigned a CRAFITY score of 1 point. Patients were divided into three groups according to their CRAFITY score (CRAFITY-low, 0 points; CRAFITY-intermediate, 1 point; and CRAFITY-high, 2 points). The differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs) were compared among the three groups. Tumor response was evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months after the first combination treatment. Risk factors for OS and PFS were assessed. Results: A total of 70 patients were included. The patients were assigned CRAFITY scores of 0 points (CRAFITY-low, n = 25 [35.71%]), 1 point (CRAFITY-intermediate, n = 29 [41.42%]), and 2 points (CRAFITY-high, n = 16 [22.81%]). Multivariate analysis showed that lower CRAFITY score was an independent factor for the improved OS (P =.045) and PFS (P <.001). TACE session was also associated with the OS (P =.048) in the multivariate analysis. The CRAFITY-low cohort achieved a higher objective response rate (ORR) at the 3-month evaluation of tumor response. However, there was no significant difference in ORR and disease control rate (DCR) observed at the 6-month follow-up. DCR showed a statistically significant difference among three groups during the 12-month follow-up period. The percentage of patients with protein urea was highest in the CRAFITY-high group. No significance differences were observed in grade ≥ 3 AEs in three groups. Conclusion: The CRAFITY score is simple and could be useful for predicting treatment outcomes, tumor response and AEs of the HCC patients receiving TACE plus TKIs and PD-1 inhibitor therapy.