ALESSIA RENZI

Dr. ALESSIA RENZI

Sapienza, Rome, Lazio, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Rachele MarianiRachele Mariani
Rachele Mariani
ARALESSIA RENZI
ALESSIA RENZI
CMCinzia Di Monte
Cinzia Di Monte
EPElena Petrovska
Elena Petrovska
MTMichela Di Trani
Michela Di Trani
(1) Background: The COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a unique challenge as a severe global crisis affecting physical and psychological health. The main purpose of this work is to study the impact of a traumatic event while also observing the human ability to adapt. One of the first theories to study the adaptive importance of the evolutionary lineage of the affective systems is referred to as BrainMind (Panksepp, 2010). This study aims to explore whether primary emotional systems (PES) and emotion regulation (ER) strategies show differences between the pre- and post- lockdown period; and if positive systems and specific emotion regulation pre-pandemic act as a protective or risk factor for mental and physical wellbeing. (2) Methods: 98 participants who had participated in a previous study before the pandemic were re-contacted to refill the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scale (ANPS) and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) after the outbreak of the pandemic with the addition of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90R). (3) Results: The results showed that the COVID-19 lockdown rules had an impact on Emotional Regulation and on a re-balancing of PES. Moreover, pre-pandemic expressive–suppressive ERQ strategies and ANPS SADNESS scores appeared as relevant risk factors, which predicted higher Global Severity Index (GSI) scores during lockdown. (4) Conclusions: The lockdown appears to have activated PLAY and CARE as protective systems, but has detuned the ability to positively reinterpret the situation.

24 September 2019 in Psychology & Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARALESSIA RENZI
ALESSIA RENZI
LSLuigi Solano
Luigi Solano
MTMichela Di Trani
Michela Di Trani
FGFrancesca Ginobbi
Francesca Ginobbi
EMElisa Minutolo
Elisa Minutolo
RTRenata Tambelli
Renata Tambelli
Objective: World Health Organization reported that in developed countries one in four couples experience infertility with serious implications for the psychophysical well-being. Aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Pennebaker’s writing technique on pregnancy rates, alexithymia and psychophysical health during an assisted reproductive treatment (ART). Method: 91 women admitted for an ART were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental one (n = 46), where women wrote about their thoughts and emotions concerning the infertility experience, and a control group (n = 45) where women did not write. All subjects completed a socio-demographic questionnaire, the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and the Symptoms Checklist-90-R before and after the writing sessions. Results: A significant difference in pregnancy rates between the experimental group (n = 13) and the control group (n = 5) was found (χ2 = 4.216; p < .04). A significant difference was also found between women who participated in the study (experimental + control= 91) and women who declined to participate, in the direction of more ART successes (n = 18 vs. n = 0) in the group of women who participated (χ2 = 10.17; p < .01). Conclusions: The findings support the usefulness of the writing technique during ART in promoting treatment success.

30 May 2020 in Stress and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARALESSIA RENZI
ALESSIA RENZI
MTMichela Di Trani
Michela Di Trani
LSLuigi Solano
Luigi Solano
EMElisa Minutolo
Elisa Minutolo
RTRenata Tambelli
Renata Tambelli

28 August 2023 in Pain Research and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSara Bottiroli
Sara Bottiroli
ARALESSIA RENZI
ALESSIA RENZI
EBElena Ballante
Elena Ballante
RIRoberto De Icco
Roberto De Icco
GSGrazia Sances
Grazia Sances
Federica GalliFederica Galli
Federica Galli
Background. Chronic headache (CH) is a condition that includes different subtypes of headaches and that can impair different life domains. Personality traits can play a relevant role both in the development and in coping with this medical condition. The first aim of the present study is to realize a systematic review of the personality traits associated with CH compared to healthy controls; the second objective is to carry out a quantitative meta-analysis with the studies using the same instrument to assess personality traits. Method. The literature search encompassed articles published from 1988 until December 2022 on the major databases in the field of health and social sciences: PubMed, Scopus, PsychInfo, and Web of Science. Results. Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review, but only three studies were deeply explored in a meta-analysis since the only ones used a common instrument for personality assessment (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory). According to the meta-analysis, different subtypes of CH patients scored higher than healthy controls on Hypochondriasis and Hysteria Scales. The systematic review showed higher levels of depressive and anxious personality dimensions and pain catastrophizing in CH compared to healthy controls. Moreover, frequent-chronic forms and medication-overuse headache were the most symptomatic and frail categories showing higher levels of dysfunctional personality traits and psychopathological symptoms. Conclusions. These results seem to confirm a neurotic profile in patients suffering from CH. The identification of the main personality traits involved in the onset and maintenance of headache disorders represents an important objective for developing psychological interventions.

4 February 2020 in Psychiatric Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRita Cerutti
Rita Cerutti
VSValentina Spensieri
Valentina Spensieri
FPFabio Presaghi
Fabio Presaghi
ARALESSIA RENZI
ALESSIA RENZI
NPNicola Palumbo
Nicola Palumbo
MTMichela Di Trani
Michela Di Trani

7 September 2020 in Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARALESSIA RENZI
ALESSIA RENZI
Rachele MarianiRachele Mariani
Rachele Mariani
MTMichela Di Trani
Michela Di Trani
RTRenata Tambelli
Renata Tambelli
Expressive writing techniques are methods focusing on written emotional expression that require people to write about traumatic or difficult experiences, with the objective of promoting an elaboration of these events. The general aim of the study is to investigate the influence of alexithymia, a deficit in emotional regulation processes, on the effects of an expressive writing intervention, analyzing the writing protocols through the use of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWIC) and Referential Process (RP) linguistic measures via IDAAP software. Thirty-five women undergoing an assisted reproductive treatment participated in the study and filled out a sociodemographic questionnaire, the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. They also underwent three session of writing, following a request that they write about their emotions regarding their current situation. The women enrolled were divided into two groups: low alexithymia and high alexithymia, comprising individuals with a TAS-20 total score lower or higher than the mean, respectively. Analyses within the groups during the three writing sessions revealed that the women with low alexithymia reported a greater number of words expressing affectivity, sadness and future perspective, whereas no significances in the high alexithymia group emerged. Moreover, when analysing differences between the groups, high-alexithymia women reported lower scores in RP indexes and fewer words expressing sadness, future perspectives and we verbal. In conclusion, these preliminary findings may confirm the hypothesis that alexithymia affects the effectiveness of expressive writing through a difficulty in becoming involved in the writing process and a lack of symbolizing processes.