Melanie Kah

Dr. Melanie Kah

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 May 2018 in Nature Nanotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMelanie Kah
Melanie Kah
RKRai Singh Kookana
Rai Singh Kookana
AGAlexander Gogos
Alexander Gogos
TBThomas Bucheli
Thomas Bucheli

5 June 2019 in Nature Nanotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMelanie Kah
Melanie Kah
NTNathalie Tufenkji
Nathalie Tufenkji
JWJason C. White
Jason C. White

1 February 2014 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMelanie Kah
Melanie Kah
Thilo HofmannThilo Hofmann
Thilo Hofmann

1 January 2013 in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMelanie Kah
Melanie Kah
SBS. Beulke
S. Beulke
KTK. Tiede
K. Tiede
Thilo HofmannThilo Hofmann
Thilo Hofmann
Published literature has been reviewed in order to (a) explore the (potential) applications of nanotechnology in pesticide formulation, (b) identify possible impacts on environmental fate, and (c) analyze the suitability of current exposure assessment procedures to account for the novel properties of nanopesticides within the EU regulatory context. The term nanopesticide covers a wide variety of products and cannot be considered to represent a single category. Many nanoformulations combine several surfactants, polymers, and metal nanoparticles in the nanometer size range. The aims of nanoformulations are generally common to other pesticide formulations, these being to increase the apparent solubility of poorly soluble active ingredients, to release the active ingredient in a slow/targeted manner and/or to protect against premature degradation. Nanoformulations are thus expected to (a) have significant impacts on the fate of active ingredients and/or (b) introduce new ingredients for which the environmental fate is still poorly understood (e.g., nanosilver). Therefore, it seems that adaptations of current exposure assessment approaches will be necessary, at least for some nanopesticides. The present analysis provides a useful framework to identify priorities for future research in order to achieve more robust risk assessments of nanopesticides.

22 April 2014 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RKRai S. Kookana
Rai S. Kookana
ABAlistair B. A. Boxall
Alistair B. A. Boxall
PRPhilip T. Reeves
Philip T. Reeves
RARoman Ashauer
Roman Ashauer
SBSabine Beulke
Sabine Beulke
PBPaul J. Van Den Brink
Paul J. Van Den Brink
Nanopesticides or nano plant protection products represent an emerging technological development that, in relation to pesticide use, could offer a range of benefits including increased efficacy, durability, and a reduction in the amounts of active ingredients that need to be used. A number of formulation types have been suggested including emulsions (e.g., nanoemulsions), nanocapsules (e.g., with polymers), and products containing pristine engineered nanoparticles, such as metals, metal oxides, and nanoclays. The increasing interest in the use of nanopesticides raises questions as to how to assess the environmental risk of these materials for regulatory purposes. Here, the current approaches for environmental risk assessment of pesticides are reviewed and the question of whether these approaches are fit for purpose for use on nanopesticides is addressed. Potential adaptations to existing environmental risk assessment tests and procedures for use with nanopesticides are discussed, addressing aspects such as analysis and characterization, environmental fate and exposure assessment, uptake by biota, ecotoxicity, and risk assessment of nanopesticides in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Throughout, the main focus is on assessing whether the presence of the nanoformulation introduces potential differences relative to the conventional active ingredients. The proposed changes in the test methodology, research priorities, and recommendations would facilitate the development of regulatory approaches and a regulatory framework for nanopesticides.