Hussein Naseraldin

Dr. Hussein Naseraldin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 November 2010 in Production and Operations Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OBOpher Baron
Opher Baron
JMJoseph Milner
Joseph Milner
HNHussein Naseraldin
Hussein Naseraldin

5 August 2019 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Yuval CohenYuval Cohen
Yuval Cohen
HNHussein Naseraldin
Hussein Naseraldin
ACAtanu Chaudhuri
Atanu Chaudhuri
Francesco PilatiFrancesco Pilati
Francesco Pilati

31 May 2011 in Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HNHussein Naseraldin
Hussein Naseraldin
YHYale T. Herer
Yale T. Herer

1 August 2015 in European Journal of Operational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YSYaron Shaposhnik
Yaron Shaposhnik
YHYale T. Herer
Yale T. Herer
HNHussein Naseraldin
Hussein Naseraldin


3 February 2021 in Games
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGila Fruchter
Gila Fruchter
HNHussein Naseraldin
Hussein Naseraldin
Production emissions in the industrial sector are a major source of environmental pollution. In this paper, we explore how emission considerations are integrated with production decisions. We develop a dynamic model consisting of two firms located in the same industrial park, which satisfies exogenously given demands in separate markets. The two firms can build up or rundown stocks (full backlogging), both of which are costly. The emission cost depends on the total output of the two firms. We develop Nash equilibrium feedback strategies, where each firm decides on its output based on its inventory or the inventories of both. We also develop a social planning solution where decisions are centralized. We present the analytic results for the total profits in these settings. The results show the benefits of a decentralized approach over a centralized one, provided there is a mechanism for coordination. Finally, emission costs are compared for the various solution concepts.