Ling Xue

Ling Xue


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 June 2021 in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYuzhen Zhang
Yuzhen Zhang
CXCheng Xie
Cheng Xie
LXLing Xue
Ling Xue
YTYanyun Tao
Yanyun Tao
GYGuoqi Yue
Guoqi Yue
BJBin Jiang
Bin Jiang
To interprete the importance of clinical features and genotypes for warfarin daily dose prediction, we developed a post-hoc interpretable framework based on an ensemble predictive model. This framework includes permutation importance for global interpretation and local interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) and shapley additive explanations (SHAP) for local explanation. The permutation importance globally ranks the importance of features on the whole data set. This can guide us to build a predictive model with less variables and the complexity of final predictive model can be reduced. LIME and SHAP together explain how the predictive model give the predicted dosage for specific samples. This help clinicians prescribe accurate doses to patients using more effective clinical variables. Results showed that both the permutation importance and SHAP demonstrated that VKORC1, age, serum creatinine (SCr), left atrium (LA) size, CYP2C9 and weight were the most important features on the whole data set. In specific samples, both SHAP and LIME discovered that in Chinese patients, wild-type VKORC1-AA, mutant-type CYP2C9*3, age over 60, abnormal LA size, SCr within the normal range, and using amiodarone definitely required dosage reduction, whereas mutant-type VKORC1-AG/GG, small age, SCr out of normal range, normal LA size, diabetes and heavy weight required dosage enhancementt.

4 June 2024 in International Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LXLing Xue
Ling Xue
SHShan He
Shan He
Rajeev K. SinglaRajeev K. Singla
Rajeev K. Singla
QQQiong Qin
Qiong Qin
YDYinglong Ding
Yinglong Ding
Humbert G. DíazHumbert G. Díaz
Humbert G. Díaz
Background: Warfarin is a common oral anticoagulant, and its effects vary widely among individuals. Numerous dose-prediction algorithms have been reported based on cross-sectional data generated via multiple linear regression or machine learning. This study aimed to construct an information fusion perturbation theory and machine-learning prediction model of warfarin blood levels based on clinical longitudinal data from cardiac surgery patients. Methods and material: The data of 246 patients were obtained from electronic medical records. Continuous variables were processed by calculating the distance of the raw data with the moving average (MA ∆vki(s j)), and categorical variables in different attribute groups were processed using Euclidean distance (ED ǁ∆vk(s j)ǁ). Regression and classification analyses were performed on the raw data, MA ∆vki(s j), and ED ǁ∆vk(s j)ǁ. Different machine-learning algorithms were chosen for the STATISTICA and WEKA software. Results: The random forest (RF) algorithm was the best for predicting continuous outputs using the raw data. The correlation coefficients of the RF algorithm were 0.978 and 0.595 for the training and validation sets, respectively, and the mean absolute errors were 0.135 and 0.362 for the training and validation sets, respectively. The proportion of ideal predictions of the RF algorithm was 59.0%. General discriminant analysis (GDA) was the best algorithm for predicting the categorical outputs using the MA ∆vki(s j) data. The GDA algorithm’s total true positive rate (TPR) was 95.4% and 95.6% for the training and validation sets, respectively, with MA ∆vki(s j) data. Conclusions: An information fusion perturbation theory and machine-learning model for predicting warfarin blood levels was established. A model based on the RF algorithm could be used to predict the target international normalized ratio (INR), and a model based on the GDA algorithm could be used to predict the probability of being within the target INR range under different clinical scenarios.